the Female Body GOVERNING

58
paula saukko
Jordan, W. M. (1961, November 18). Letter to editor. Lancet, 1146–1147.
Layne, L. (2003). Motherhood lost: A feminist account of pregnancy loss in America. New
York: Routledge.
Marks, L. (2001). Sexual chemistry: History of the contraceptive pill. New Heaven, CT:
Yale University Press.
Melzer, D., & Zimmern, R. (2002). Genetics and medicalisation, BMJ, 324, 863–
864.
Middeldorp, S., Meinardi, J., Koopman, M., Van Pampus, E., Hamulyak, K, van der
Meer, J., Prins, M., & Büller, H. (2001). A prospective study of asymptomatic
carriers of the Factor V Leiden mutation to determine the incidence of
venuous thromboembolism, Annals of Internal Medicine, 135, 322–327.
Novas, C., & Rose, N. (2000). Genetic risks and the birth of the somatic individual.
Economy and Society, 29, 485–513.
Petersen, A. (2003). The new genetics and “citizenship.” Retrieved September 16,
2004, from http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/BIOS/docs/AlanPetersen.pdf
Petersen, A., & Bunton, R. (2002). The new genetics and the public’s health. London:
Routledge.
Rabinow, P. (1996). Artifi ciality and enlightenment: From socio-biology to
biosociality. In P. Rabinow, Essays on the anthropology of reason (pp. 91–111).
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rapp. R., Heath, D., & Taussig, K.-S. (2001). Genealogical dis-ease: Where
hereditary abnormality, biomedical explanation and family responsibility
meet. In S. Franklin & S. McKinnon (Eds.), Relative values: Reconfi guring
kinship studies (pp. 384–412). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Richardson, K. (2003). Health risks on the Internet: Establishing credibility on
line, Health, Risk and Society, 5, 171–184.
Saukko, P. (2004). Genomic susceptibility-testing and pregnancy: Something old,
something new. New Genetics and Society, 23, 313–325.
Saukko, P. (2009). Genetic risk online and offl ine: Two ways of being susceptible
to blood clots. Health, Risk and Society, 11, 1–16.
Saukko, P., Richards, S., Shepherd, M., & Campbell, J. (2006). Are genetic tests
exceptional? Lessons from a qualitative study on thrombophilia. Social Science
and Medicine, 63, 1947–1959.
Seale, C., Ziebland, S., & Charteris-Black, J. (2006). Gender, cancer experience
and Internet use: A comparative keyword analysis of interviews and online
cancer support groups. Social Science and Medicine, 62, 2577–2590.
Sharf, B. (1997). Communicating breast-cancer on-line: Support and empowerment
on the Internet. Women and Health, 26, 65–84.
Smith, J., Michie, S., Stephenson, M., & Quarrel, O. (2002). Risk perception and
decision-making in candidates for genetic testing for Huntington’s disease:
An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Journal of Health Psychology, 7,
131–144.
Stabile, C. (1993). Shooting the mother: Fetal photography and the politics of
disappearance. Camera Obscura, 28, 179–206.
Sullivan, C. (2003). Gendered cybersupport: A thematic analysis of two online
cancer support groups, Journal of Health Psychology, 8, 1, 83-103.
Timmermans, S., & Berg, M. (2003). The gold standard. The challenge of evidencebased
medicine and standardization in health care. Philadelphia: Temple University
Press.
Weinshilboum, R. (2003). Inheritance and drug response. New England Journal of
Medicine, 348, 529–537.