06.12.2012 Aufrufe

An unprocessed draft manuscript being reconstructed ... - WNLibrary

An unprocessed draft manuscript being reconstructed ... - WNLibrary

An unprocessed draft manuscript being reconstructed ... - WNLibrary

MEHR ANZEIGEN
WENIGER ANZEIGEN

Sie wollen auch ein ePaper? Erhöhen Sie die Reichweite Ihrer Titel.

YUMPU macht aus Druck-PDFs automatisch weboptimierte ePaper, die Google liebt.

00<br />

david irving Secretly Overheard:<br />

forget me,” said Diebner. “I have got good connections there. As<br />

for Dr. Korsching, Major Rittner noted, “[He] has often expressed<br />

annoyance at the <strong>An</strong>glophile behaviour of some of his colleagues.”<br />

Much of their conversation centred on the little technical information<br />

released by the Allies on August 8, 1945 about the making<br />

of the uranium (Hiroshima) and plutonium (Nagasaki) bombs.<br />

Bagge, talking about “plutonium” – a name coined by the Allies<br />

– said: “This would mean that they had a running and stabilised<br />

Maschine. On the other hand they say that they have not got one.<br />

Therefore it is still difficult to believe.” (They were still unaware of<br />

the use of graphite as a moderator in atomic piles.)<br />

Heisenberg was also frankly puzzled by the small size of the<br />

bomb: “I do not see how the [chain] reaction can take place in eight<br />

pounds of something, since the mean free paths are fairly long.<br />

They have always got free paths of 4 cms. In eight pounds they will<br />

surely get no chain reaction whatsoever. But still it may not necessarily<br />

be true, what is written in the newspapers.”<br />

“Yes,” said Wirtz. “But I do believe that they have got it and I feel<br />

sure that the bomb is not big.”<br />

On the next day, August 9, Heisenberg did some calculations on<br />

the size, and still drew a blank. “Well how have they actually done<br />

it?” he snorted in frustration to Harteck. “I find it is a disgrace if<br />

we, the Professors who had worked on it, cannot at least work out<br />

how they did it.”<br />

Harteck suggested the Allies might have separated several kilos<br />

of protactinium, a tiny radioactive by-product of the manufacture<br />

of radium. (Heisenberg calculated that 140,000 tons of uranium ore<br />

would produce 20 kilos of protactinium). Heisenberg said, “They<br />

have quite obviously worked on a scale of quite fantastic proportions.”<br />

Harteck believed they had produced the explosive from an<br />

atomic pile.<br />

“If they have made it with a Maschine,” Heisenberg pointed out,<br />

“then there is the fantastically difficult problem that they have had<br />

to carry out chemical processes [to separate the plutonium] with<br />

Colonel Friedrich Geist, Speer’s chief of technical research.<br />

this is a copyright <strong>manuscript</strong> © david irving 2007

Hurra! Ihre Datei wurde hochgeladen und ist bereit für die Veröffentlichung.

Erfolgreich gespeichert!

Leider ist etwas schief gelaufen!