06.12.2012 Aufrufe

An unprocessed draft manuscript being reconstructed ... - WNLibrary

An unprocessed draft manuscript being reconstructed ... - WNLibrary

An unprocessed draft manuscript being reconstructed ... - WNLibrary

MEHR ANZEIGEN
WENIGER ANZEIGEN

Sie wollen auch ein ePaper? Erhöhen Sie die Reichweite Ihrer Titel.

YUMPU macht aus Druck-PDFs automatisch weboptimierte ePaper, die Google liebt.

Eavesdropping on Hitler’s Reich<br />

this terrifically radioactive material.” “Nevertheless, “ he continued<br />

a few moments later, “ one could say that if they have done it with a<br />

Maschine of one ton, they will be able to take out a not-inconsiderable<br />

amount of material: for instance, if 1% conversion has taken<br />

place, then they can take out 1% – that is to say 10 kilos of ’94’<br />

[plutonium] out of the machine.”<br />

Harteck was dubious. Heisenberg finally dismissed the idea: “I<br />

do not believe that the Americans could have done it. They would<br />

have had to have had, shall we say, a machine running at least not<br />

later than 1942 and they would have had to have had this machine<br />

running for at least a year and then they would have had to have<br />

done all this chemistry.”<br />

Harteck, unaware of how accurate were these estimates, agreed<br />

this was highly improbable.<br />

BAGGE: . . . On the other hand, it does not fit in that [the Allies state<br />

that] it was only in 1941 that the element ’Pluto’ was discovered. . .<br />

WIRTZ: Well, I am prepared to take on a bet that they have separated<br />

isotopes.<br />

HEISENBERG: Yes, I will of course not deny it. But there are now<br />

three quite clear ways in which they can have done it, and only three:<br />

isotope separation, proto actinium, and a Maschine with D 2 0 [Heavy<br />

Water] and element ’94’ [plutonium].<br />

WIRTZ: My method is, a Maschine with [enriched uranium and]<br />

light water, and the separation of element ’94’. I do not believe that they<br />

have so much heavy water at their disposal that they could really have<br />

many working uranium machines.<br />

On August 13, Otto Hahn, the chemist, was heard stating his<br />

view to Wirtz: “Element ’93’ decays in two or three days into ’94’.<br />

They have of course ’94’. This is obviously plutonium. . . ’93’ can be<br />

quantitatively separated from ’92’. Strassmann and I have worked<br />

out the “uantitative separation.”<br />

At the end of August1945 Major Rittner let Otto Hahn see the issue<br />

of the American magazine Life devoted to the bomb; there were<br />

several photographs of the world’s leading atomic scientists, inclu-<br />

0

Hurra! Ihre Datei wurde hochgeladen und ist bereit für die Veröffentlichung.

Erfolgreich gespeichert!

Leider ist etwas schief gelaufen!