- Page 1 and 2:
Tropical Legumes II Project TROPICA
- Page 3:
TROPICAL LEGUMES II Tropical Legume
- Page 6 and 7:
Seed Production and Delivery System
- Page 8 and 9:
Enhancing Pigeonpea Productivity an
- Page 10 and 11:
NARES NASFAM NASSPA NPT NSC NSO NSS
- Page 12 and 13:
TL II was implemented in 10 target
- Page 14 and 15:
country governments in agricultural
- Page 16 and 17:
Table 1-2: continued Variety code (
- Page 18 and 19:
Table 1-3: Seed production and deli
- Page 20 and 21:
As stated earlier in this chapter,
- Page 22 and 23:
Table 1-5: Graduate degree students
- Page 24 and 25:
Ndjeunga J, Ibro A, Cisse Y, Ben Ah
- Page 26 and 27:
Project background Groundnut is one
- Page 28 and 29:
Table 2-2: Performance of ICGV 0035
- Page 30 and 31:
Table 2-6: Performance of ICGV 9111
- Page 32 and 33:
Table 2-11: Results of 255 paired c
- Page 34 and 35:
Table 2-16: Groundnut seed of vario
- Page 36 and 37:
Infrastructure facilities For effic
- Page 38 and 39:
Project sites Tamil Nadu The presen
- Page 40 and 41:
In Karnataka, the PDKV model was pr
- Page 42 and 43:
Training course A total of four tra
- Page 44 and 45:
Background The yield of groundnut i
- Page 46 and 47:
Table 3-2: Groundnut production tre
- Page 48 and 49:
In order of importance, the largest
- Page 50 and 51:
Table 3-5: Results of pair-wise com
- Page 52 and 53:
Finally, the variety choices are co
- Page 54 and 55:
hybridization techniques, design of
- Page 56 and 57: Figure 3-2: The Malawi model of the
- Page 58 and 59: Tanzania TL II has contributed to t
- Page 60 and 61: Annex 3-2: Performance of Virginia
- Page 62 and 63: Annex 3-4: Regional elite groundnut
- Page 64 and 65: 54 Engaging Smallholder Farmers | T
- Page 66 and 67: The European Union still remains th
- Page 68 and 69: Table 4-2: Proportion of households
- Page 70 and 71: Table 4-4: Amount requested, amount
- Page 72 and 73: Table 4-6. Comparison of groundnut
- Page 74 and 75: The use of other inputs (credit, in
- Page 76 and 77: A PVS evaluation was launched in pi
- Page 78 and 79: Table 4-10: Locations and contact f
- Page 80 and 81: Table 4-11: Mean pod yield (kg per
- Page 82 and 83: 99511 (Table 4-12). Most important
- Page 84 and 85: Table 4-15: Evaluation of groundnut
- Page 86 and 87: A 10-day intensive training worksho
- Page 88 and 89: Seed production of all classes A to
- Page 90 and 91: Testing seed marketing strategies A
- Page 92 and 93: as Nigeria that will face the great
- Page 94 and 95: 100 Million hectares 80 60 40 20 0
- Page 96 and 97: 70 73 76 79 82 85 88 91 94 97 00 03
- Page 98 and 99: In Niger, changes in cowpea product
- Page 100 and 101: irregular rainfall early in the cro
- Page 102 and 103: Table 5-4: Cowpea breeding lines se
- Page 104 and 105: Cowpea varieties released The proje
- Page 108 and 109: Evaluation for phosphorus-use effic
- Page 110 and 111: Figure 5-8: Reactions of some culti
- Page 112 and 113: ASS6 ASS64 ASS110 ASS56 Figure 5-9:
- Page 114 and 115: Figure 5-10: Meeting of farmers’
- Page 116 and 117: The best approach to spread the imp
- Page 118 and 119: declining soil fertility, increasin
- Page 120 and 121: In Nigeria, the small seed pack app
- Page 122 and 123: 112 Engaging Smallholder Farmers |
- Page 124 and 125: Phase I Social Sciences research in
- Page 126 and 127: The consequences are that the impro
- Page 128 and 129: about half of area share of land al
- Page 130 and 131: Figure 6-3: Average area (ha) per h
- Page 132 and 133: single lingering bottleneck on whic
- Page 134 and 135: In Kenya, the small seed pack appro
- Page 136 and 137: Summary, process gains and people r
- Page 138 and 139: Fast-Tracking and Technology Genera
- Page 140 and 141: Figure 6-6: Distribution of PVS sit
- Page 142 and 143: Table 6-12: Yields of fast track bu
- Page 144 and 145: Table 6-15: Farmer evaluation of in
- Page 146 and 147: While the fast track entries were r
- Page 148 and 149: Technology generation Mechanistic s
- Page 150 and 151: 60 50 Rainfall Pan evaporation Maxi
- Page 152 and 153: Table 6-22: Yield under drought ind
- Page 154 and 155: Number of degree training students
- Page 156 and 157:
Number of NARS technicians trained
- Page 158 and 159:
Rain-out shelter in CIAT-Colombia T
- Page 160 and 161:
Impact assessment and enhancement P
- Page 162 and 163:
Annex 6-2: TL IIEthiopia: decentral
- Page 164 and 165:
154 Engaging Smallholder Farmers |
- Page 166 and 167:
farmers for enhancing their awarene
- Page 168 and 169:
• Designing, testing and implemen
- Page 170 and 171:
Andhra Pradesh The overall sample s
- Page 172 and 173:
Prakasam district: Crops grown in P
- Page 174 and 175:
Constraints in adoption of chickpea
- Page 176 and 177:
Cost-benefit analysis for chickpea
- Page 178 and 179:
Identification of farmer-and-market
- Page 180 and 181:
Table 7-6: Breeder Seed of differen
- Page 182 and 183:
Capacity building Knowledge empower
- Page 184 and 185:
Table 7-15: Training of local seed
- Page 186 and 187:
• In addition to yield, maturity
- Page 188 and 189:
Introduction Chickpea is grown in E
- Page 190 and 191:
Chickpea seed access The first majo
- Page 192 and 193:
Grades and standards About 75% of t
- Page 194 and 195:
Table 8-6: Varieties used in PVS tr
- Page 196 and 197:
private sector lacks the incentive
- Page 198 and 199:
• LZARDI-Ukiriguru: Land along wi
- Page 200 and 201:
• Establishing functional legume
- Page 202 and 203:
Table 9-1: Farmers’ preferred var
- Page 204 and 205:
Table 9-3: Baby trials conducted in
- Page 206 and 207:
Table 9-5: Reaction of pigeonpea li
- Page 208 and 209:
TL II focuses on farmer-participato
- Page 210 and 211:
Production of Breeder, Foundation,
- Page 212 and 213:
Mahaboobnagar and Ranga Reddy distr
- Page 214 and 215:
(Table 9-9 Continued) Particular To
- Page 216 and 217:
Chichewa) and Tanzania (Swahili). O
- Page 218 and 219:
Available technologies Although imp
- Page 220 and 221:
and Chitedze in Malawi showed that
- Page 222 and 223:
Table 10-6: Various classes of qual
- Page 224 and 225:
Awareness activities Farmers’ fie
- Page 226 and 227:
Annex 10-1: Target locations for pi
- Page 228 and 229:
Adoption studies Adoption studies f
- Page 230 and 231:
3.5 Yields (Tonnes/hectare) 3.0 2.5
- Page 232 and 233:
Table 11-1: Preferred soybean trait
- Page 234 and 235:
The up-scaling program signals the
- Page 236 and 237:
Across districts, TGx 1740-2F out-y
- Page 238 and 239:
Table 11-9: Communities and famers
- Page 240 and 241:
Table 11-14 Average performance of
- Page 242 and 243:
Table 11-15: Release notes of the t
- Page 244 and 245:
In Nigeria, across locations mean p
- Page 246 and 247:
Table 11-21: Grain yield (kg per ha
- Page 248 and 249:
Progress in selection of Bradyrhizo
- Page 250 and 251:
the major soybean producing localit
- Page 252 and 253:
Seed Production and Delivery System
- Page 254 and 255:
Table 11-29: Quantity (MT) of Found
- Page 256 and 257:
utilization and marketing. In Niger
- Page 258 and 259:
Annex 11-2: Tobit Model estimate of
- Page 260:
250 Engaging Smallholder Farmers |