20.01.2014 Views

Four Seasons of Learning and Engaging Smallholder Farmers - icrisat

Four Seasons of Learning and Engaging Smallholder Farmers - icrisat

Four Seasons of Learning and Engaging Smallholder Farmers - icrisat

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Summary, process gains <strong>and</strong> people reached<br />

Product gains<br />

TL II bean seed systems have made important advances in Phase I <strong>of</strong> the project. In terms <strong>of</strong> actual<br />

products, a notable amount <strong>of</strong> foundation seed has been produced, with NARS mainly overseeing<br />

the process. Also, a remarkable amount <strong>of</strong> decentralized seed production has taken place, with the<br />

latter accomplished by facilitating numerous <strong>and</strong> diversified partnerships. Important to highlight is<br />

that the varieties being promoted are doing unusually well on-farm (see Objective 4 & Objective 1<br />

results). The good performance <strong>of</strong> Katumani – common bean varieties, in general, has encouraged<br />

more investment in the bean sub sector. For instance, a new producer <strong>of</strong> certified seed, Lambwe Seed<br />

Growers Association, has been recently licensed by KEPHIS (the Kenya seed health sector). In addition,<br />

the Kenya Ministry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture (fortunately or unfortunately) has started supplying Katumani common<br />

bean varieties as relief seed in 61 districts across Kenya.<br />

Process gains<br />

Equally important are processes or innovation gains, which will extend well beyond the life <strong>of</strong> a special<br />

project, such as TL II. Phase I has shown that:<br />

• Women can be engaged in <strong>and</strong> benefit from seed production;<br />

• Cost-effective models for seed production are being implemented (caution: although vulnerable to<br />

drought)<br />

• <strong>Farmers</strong>, including women, will pay for certified seed; there is real dem<strong>and</strong>!<br />

• Small pack marketing can be taken up by the private sector; (<strong>and</strong> is being taken up- especially in<br />

Kenya). The approach is also exp<strong>and</strong>ing across crops.<br />

• Seed loans are an effective mechanism for moving seed widely, including among those with<br />

limited financial means.<br />

• Seed loans <strong>of</strong>fer an alternative to emergency free seed distribution practice (<strong>and</strong> will be<br />

substituted in Eastern Kenya).<br />

Each <strong>of</strong> these innovation gains can <strong>and</strong> should be built on more widely.<br />

People reached<br />

Finally, in terms <strong>of</strong> documented impact, TL II common bean seed system has made an initial calculation <strong>of</strong><br />

people reached. These calculations have been derived from field data on initial seed produced, <strong>and</strong> then<br />

extrapolated using insights from known field processes. Our calculations may be on the modest side, for<br />

three reasons. 1) We used the seed sharing rate <strong>of</strong> a) one farmer to one additional farmer after the first season<br />

<strong>of</strong> use <strong>and</strong> b) two additional farmers after two seasons. However, an MSc study on actual seed loan suggests<br />

that the average may be to five other farmers. 2) We have assumed that only 80% <strong>of</strong> farmers in Kenya <strong>and</strong><br />

70% in Ethiopia distribute at all. 3) The data on reach has not been able to capture new variety <strong>and</strong> seed<br />

use that derives from local market purchase. (This may be a big gap). So we consider these calculations<br />

to be transparent, but provisional. The figures are likely to be higher. Table 6-8 shows the overall figures on<br />

reach: 1,099,736 people. Annex 6-3 shows the actual calculations <strong>and</strong> the underlying assumptions, again<br />

using Ethiopia as the example. It is important to note that only seed <strong>and</strong> reach directly achieved under the<br />

TL II project is reported. KARI <strong>and</strong> EIAR also have other projects, partners <strong>and</strong> impacts.<br />

Table 6-8: <strong>Farmers</strong> reached in Phase I<br />

Country<br />

<strong>Farmers</strong> reached<br />

Kenya 634,905<br />

Ethiopia 464,831<br />

Total 1,099,736<br />

126<br />

<strong>Engaging</strong> <strong>Smallholder</strong> <strong>Farmers</strong> | Tropical Legumes II Project

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!