20.01.2014 Views

Four Seasons of Learning and Engaging Smallholder Farmers - icrisat

Four Seasons of Learning and Engaging Smallholder Farmers - icrisat

Four Seasons of Learning and Engaging Smallholder Farmers - icrisat

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Cost-benefit analysis for chickpea cultivation<br />

Andhra Pradesh<br />

The benefit cost ratios ranged from 1.22 to 1.33 in Kurnool <strong>and</strong> Prakasam districts. Net returns from<br />

the production <strong>of</strong> chickpea are Rs 4201 per ha in Kurnool district while the net returns are much lower<br />

in case <strong>of</strong> Prakasam district. The crop provided about 40 days <strong>of</strong> employment for men <strong>and</strong> 25 days <strong>of</strong><br />

women labor employment. The overall labor required is distributed in the ratio <strong>of</strong> 2:3 <strong>and</strong> 1:3 among<br />

the men <strong>and</strong> women labor employed. If proper knowledge about the significance <strong>and</strong> costs efficiency<br />

in each operation is not known to women it may result in low yield <strong>of</strong> crop.<br />

Karnataka<br />

The overall results for all chickpea varieties together on one h<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> separately for each variety on the<br />

other cultivated in the study area was found to be economically viable. This was indicated by benefitcost<br />

ratio (BCR) <strong>of</strong> more than one (> 1) <strong>and</strong> positive net returns on chickpea crop. The overall net returns<br />

over fixed cost were positive <strong>and</strong> was Rs. 7260/ha in adopted villages <strong>and</strong> B:C ratio was 1.50. Similar<br />

observation was made for different chickpea varieties. Net returns over fixed cost in case <strong>of</strong> Annigeri for<br />

adopted villages was Rs.7191/ha. <strong>and</strong> the corresponding B:C ratio is1.49. In case <strong>of</strong> Kabuli varieties,<br />

corresponding net returns <strong>and</strong> B:C ratios were Rs.8261/ha (BCR-1.55). Bhima <strong>and</strong> local varieties also<br />

followed a similar trend in respect <strong>of</strong> net returns <strong>and</strong> BCR. Among various costs incurred human <strong>and</strong><br />

bullock labor accounted a substantial proportion in the total cost.<br />

Drought research issues<br />

Andhra Pradesh<br />

The two areas under study have twin problem <strong>of</strong> drought <strong>and</strong> flood, Prakasam being coastal district<br />

was effected by floods during 2007-08 <strong>and</strong> Kurnool was affected by floods during 2009-10 (First week<br />

<strong>of</strong> October due to back waters <strong>of</strong> reservoirs nearby <strong>and</strong> heavy rains received in <strong>and</strong> around Kurnool<br />

within a span <strong>of</strong> 48 hours indicating the warning signals <strong>of</strong> climate change in dry <strong>and</strong> low rainfall areas<br />

during post-rainy season). Drought is a regular feature in these two districts hence diversification in the<br />

income earning are important. There was diversification in income earning activities <strong>of</strong> different family<br />

members even though Agriculture is treated as main activity. Detailed studies are needed to assess<br />

potential impacts <strong>of</strong> climate change on agriculture production in drought affected areas.<br />

Karnataka<br />

Delayed monsoons in recent years <strong>of</strong>ten cause drought conditions in Dharwad district. While,<br />

Gulbarga is one <strong>of</strong> the chronically drought hit districts <strong>of</strong> the state <strong>and</strong> frequent droughts are very<br />

common making farmers’ livelihood more difficult. Thus, the research priorities in the wake <strong>of</strong> recurring<br />

drought conditions <strong>and</strong> also due to market driven preferences should mainly be focused. Need to<br />

develop suitable varieties by strengthening crop improvement program to overcome uncertainties in<br />

yield <strong>and</strong> income <strong>of</strong> the farmers in the area. Need to strengthen the seed supply chains (institutional<br />

linkages among R&D organizations, private seed companies, NGOs, KVKs, local village institutions)<br />

for production <strong>and</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> quality seed to farmers. Popularize new varieties on mission mode<br />

through approaches like, training, demonstrations, trials, field days, farmers’ fairs, etc.<br />

166<br />

<strong>Engaging</strong> <strong>Smallholder</strong> <strong>Farmers</strong> | Tropical Legumes II Project

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!