Four Seasons of Learning and Engaging Smallholder Farmers - icrisat

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Annex 3-4: Regional elite groundnut variety trial - Spanish Bunch (Chitedze Research Station, Malawi) - 2009/10 Season Cultivar name Final plant stand Pod yield(kg per ha) Kernel yield(kg per ha) yield as % of JL 24 Haulm yield(kg per ha) Days to reach 75% flowering %wt on sieve 19 % wt on sieve 15 ELS 1 ELS 2 Shelling percentage 100 seed mass(g) ICGV 94139 91 2752 1854 125 1693 46 56.66 89.96 4 8 68.6 45.54 ICGV-SM 00537 72 2401 1631 110 1163 44 51.48 101.16 4 9 68.15 53.02 ICGV-SM 01514 75 1815 1186 80 526 46 26.53 67.39 4 5 65.08 40.52 ICGV-SM 03513 85 1862 1334 90 1756 44 14.79 74.57 4 6 69.95 33.03 ICGV-SM 03516 77 2317 1565 105 755 44 35.14 101.43 6 9 68.28 48.05 ICGV-SM 03517 73 2007 1135 76 1200 43 31.23 101.24 5 9 57.97 43.08 ICGV-SM 03520 83 2486 1701 115 2204 44 29.46 85.51 5 8 67.5 43.7 ICGV-SM 03530 61 1588 1054 71 985 41 51.7 99.23 5 10 67.5 41.97 ICGV-SM 03532 72 2264 1622 109 1451 45 42.02 89.72 5 9 71.57 40.27 ICGV-SM 05711 81 1505 1060 71 552 45 29.78 86.29 4 7 69.43 26.15 ICGV-SM 05723 76 3297 2373 160 1526 44 86.94 98.03 5 8 73.7 51.15 ICGV-SM 05725 76 1896 1424 96 2430 44 73.31 91.1 5 8 74.26 42.9 ICGV-SM 05733 77 1541 1168 79 870 45 31.08 91.16 5 7 73 34.39 ICGV-SM 05738 90 1957 1231 83 652 39 82.07 100.15 4 5 62.53 52.64 ICGV-SM 05756 79 1565 1096 74 701 45 45.02 90.12 4 6 70.03 41.98 ICGV-SM 99537 79 3303 2042 138 1895 43 60.26 125.16 3 8 61.25 38.49 ICGV-SM 99551 88 2376 1495 101 1590 43 53.92 105.56 4 7 62.71 44.77 ICGV-SM 99566 70 2028 1451 98 -36 43 57.32 91.25 5 8 70.63 48.25 ICGV-SM 99568 69 2388 1810 122 1970 42 56.59 89.09 4 8 76.17 57.57 JL 24 99 2050 1484 100 730 47 51.4 93.6 4 6 72.15 43.28 Grand Mean 79 2169.9 1485.8 1230.65 43.7505 48.335 93.586 4.37505 7.4999 68.523 43.5375 FPr 0.31 0.737 0.888 0.619 0.061 0.117 0.685 0.079 0.02 0.341 0.005 CV (%) 12.22 29.66 32.21 65.17 3.17 25.23 18.27 14.4 11.48 8.04 8.12 SED 12.42 832.5 618.9 1037 1.794 15.78 22.11 0.815 1.114 7.13 4.574 52 Engaging Smallholder Farmers | Tropical Legumes II Project
Annex 3-5: Regional elite groundnut variety trial - Spanish Bunch (Chitedze Research Station, Malawi), 2009/10 Season Cultivar name Final plant stand Pod yield (kg per ha) Kernel yield (kg per ha) yield as % of JL 24 Haulm yield (kg per ha) Days to 75% flowering % wt on sieve 19 % wt on sieve 15 Shelling % ELS 1 ELS2 100 seed mass(g) ICGV 94139 94 2462 1640 103 1619 46 47.69 86.71 67.72 3 8 43.37 ICGV-SM 00537 71 2202 1527 96 1197 43 43.03 99.87 69.16 4 9 52.13 ICGV-SM 01514 73 2002 1375 87 711 45 25.01 67.02 69.11 4 5 42.2 ICGV-SM 03513 85 2119 1673 106 1567 43 17.88 71.59 75.89 4 6 34.95 ICGV-SM 03516 70 2072 1383 87 603 44 34.77 94.81 67.64 5 9 45.23 ICGV-SM 03517 67 2288 1363 86 1345 42 39.3 109.37 59.52 5 9 47.91 ICGV-SM 03520 80 2241 1428 90 1968 42 38.19 105.84 63.51 6 8 45.45 ICGV-SM 03530 61 1589 988 62 1159 42 53.15 102.08 65.8 5 9 40.9 ICGV-SM 03532 74 1868 1336 84 1086 45 44.86 92.94 70.79 5 8 37.26 ICGV-SM 05711 80 1994 1487 94 698 45 39.46 85.39 73.46 4 7 29.33 ICGV-SM 05723 79 3007 2159 136 1452 44 77.97 94.78 72.82 5 8 48.98 ICGV-SM 05725 79 1871 1416 89 2502 45 62.67 82.85 76.78 5 8 42.45 ICGV-SM 05733 78 2196 1527 96 911 46 45.09 84.63 71.1 4 6 37.32 ICGV-SM 05738 93 1932 1223 77 724 40 71.42 91.9 62.63 3 5 52.19 ICGV-SM 05756 79 1928 1329 84 846 45 52.4 92.96 69.99 4 6 43.76 ICGV-SM 99537 78 2777 1589 100 1956 43 58.89 129.13 56.5 3 7 34.26 ICGV-SM 99551 88 2739 1728 109 1735 43 61.3 108.4 62.68 4 7 46.55 ICGV-SM 99566 73 2269 1597 101 103 44 56.1 88.16 69.59 5 8 49.19 ICGV-SM 99568 71 1838 1364 86 1851 41 54.22 92.12 72.32 4 8 53.62 JL 24 97 2005 1585 100 579 45 43.3 91.15 77.05 5 7 43.69 Grand Mean 79 2169.95 1485.85 1230.6 43.75 48.335 93.585 68.703 4.37505 7.5 43.537 FPr 0.217 0.92 0.981 0.42 0.095 0.198 0.483 0.488 0.093 0.006 0.001 CV (%) 11.69 31.51 35.08 59.96 3.42 29.79 17.26 9.48 15.12 9.65 7.22 SED 10.82 804.7 613.4 868.2 1.759 16.94 19.01 8.437 0.7785 0.8517 4.113 Progress of Phase 1 53
Page 1 and 2:
Tropical Legumes II Project TROPICA
Page 3:
TROPICAL LEGUMES II Tropical Legume
Page 6 and 7:
Seed Production and Delivery System
Page 8 and 9:
Enhancing Pigeonpea Productivity an
Page 10 and 11:
NARES NASFAM NASSPA NPT NSC NSO NSS
Page 12 and 13: TL II was implemented in 10 target
Page 14 and 15: country governments in agricultural
Page 16 and 17: Table 1-2: continued Variety code (
Page 18 and 19: Table 1-3: Seed production and deli
Page 20 and 21: As stated earlier in this chapter,
Page 22 and 23: Table 1-5: Graduate degree students
Page 24 and 25: Ndjeunga J, Ibro A, Cisse Y, Ben Ah
Page 26 and 27: Project background Groundnut is one
Page 28 and 29: Table 2-2: Performance of ICGV 0035
Page 30 and 31: Table 2-6: Performance of ICGV 9111
Page 32 and 33: Table 2-11: Results of 255 paired c
Page 34 and 35: Table 2-16: Groundnut seed of vario
Page 36 and 37: Infrastructure facilities For effic
Page 38 and 39: Project sites Tamil Nadu The presen
Page 40 and 41: In Karnataka, the PDKV model was pr
Page 42 and 43: Training course A total of four tra
Page 44 and 45: Background The yield of groundnut i
Page 46 and 47: Table 3-2: Groundnut production tre
Page 48 and 49: In order of importance, the largest
Page 50 and 51: Table 3-5: Results of pair-wise com
Page 52 and 53: Finally, the variety choices are co
Page 54 and 55: hybridization techniques, design of
Page 56 and 57: Figure 3-2: The Malawi model of the
Page 58 and 59: Tanzania TL II has contributed to t
Page 60 and 61: Annex 3-2: Performance of Virginia
Page 64 and 65: 54 Engaging Smallholder Farmers | T
Page 66 and 67: The European Union still remains th
Page 68 and 69: Table 4-2: Proportion of households
Page 70 and 71: Table 4-4: Amount requested, amount
Page 72 and 73: Table 4-6. Comparison of groundnut
Page 74 and 75: The use of other inputs (credit, in
Page 76 and 77: A PVS evaluation was launched in pi
Page 78 and 79: Table 4-10: Locations and contact f
Page 80 and 81: Table 4-11: Mean pod yield (kg per
Page 82 and 83: 99511 (Table 4-12). Most important
Page 84 and 85: Table 4-15: Evaluation of groundnut
Page 86 and 87: A 10-day intensive training worksho
Page 88 and 89: Seed production of all classes A to
Page 90 and 91: Testing seed marketing strategies A
Page 92 and 93: as Nigeria that will face the great
Page 94 and 95: 100 Million hectares 80 60 40 20 0
Page 96 and 97: 70 73 76 79 82 85 88 91 94 97 00 03
Page 98 and 99: In Niger, changes in cowpea product
Page 100 and 101: irregular rainfall early in the cro
Page 102 and 103: Table 5-4: Cowpea breeding lines se
Page 104 and 105: Cowpea varieties released The proje
Page 106 and 107: Table 5-8: Number of days to flower
Page 108 and 109: Evaluation for phosphorus-use effic
Page 110 and 111: Figure 5-8: Reactions of some culti
Page 112 and 113:
ASS6 ASS64 ASS110 ASS56 Figure 5-9:
Page 114 and 115:
Figure 5-10: Meeting of farmers’
Page 116 and 117:
The best approach to spread the imp
Page 118 and 119:
declining soil fertility, increasin
Page 120 and 121:
In Nigeria, the small seed pack app
Page 122 and 123:
112 Engaging Smallholder Farmers |
Page 124 and 125:
Phase I Social Sciences research in
Page 126 and 127:
The consequences are that the impro
Page 128 and 129:
about half of area share of land al
Page 130 and 131:
Figure 6-3: Average area (ha) per h
Page 132 and 133:
single lingering bottleneck on whic
Page 134 and 135:
In Kenya, the small seed pack appro
Page 136 and 137:
Summary, process gains and people r
Page 138 and 139:
Fast-Tracking and Technology Genera
Page 140 and 141:
Figure 6-6: Distribution of PVS sit
Page 142 and 143:
Table 6-12: Yields of fast track bu
Page 144 and 145:
Table 6-15: Farmer evaluation of in
Page 146 and 147:
While the fast track entries were r
Page 148 and 149:
Technology generation Mechanistic s
Page 150 and 151:
60 50 Rainfall Pan evaporation Maxi
Page 152 and 153:
Table 6-22: Yield under drought ind
Page 154 and 155:
Number of degree training students
Page 156 and 157:
Number of NARS technicians trained
Page 158 and 159:
Rain-out shelter in CIAT-Colombia T
Page 160 and 161:
Impact assessment and enhancement P
Page 162 and 163:
Annex 6-2: TL IIEthiopia: decentral
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
farmers for enhancing their awarene
Page 168 and 169:
• Designing, testing and implemen
Page 170 and 171:
Andhra Pradesh The overall sample s
Page 172 and 173:
Prakasam district: Crops grown in P
Page 174 and 175:
Constraints in adoption of chickpea
Page 176 and 177:
Cost-benefit analysis for chickpea
Page 178 and 179:
Identification of farmer-and-market
Page 180 and 181:
Table 7-6: Breeder Seed of differen
Page 182 and 183:
Capacity building Knowledge empower
Page 184 and 185:
Table 7-15: Training of local seed
Page 186 and 187:
• In addition to yield, maturity
Page 188 and 189:
Introduction Chickpea is grown in E
Page 190 and 191:
Chickpea seed access The first majo
Page 192 and 193:
Grades and standards About 75% of t
Page 194 and 195:
Table 8-6: Varieties used in PVS tr
Page 196 and 197:
private sector lacks the incentive
Page 198 and 199:
• LZARDI-Ukiriguru: Land along wi
Page 200 and 201:
• Establishing functional legume
Page 202 and 203:
Table 9-1: Farmers’ preferred var
Page 204 and 205:
Table 9-3: Baby trials conducted in
Page 206 and 207:
Table 9-5: Reaction of pigeonpea li
Page 208 and 209:
TL II focuses on farmer-participato
Page 210 and 211:
Production of Breeder, Foundation,
Page 212 and 213:
Mahaboobnagar and Ranga Reddy distr
Page 214 and 215:
(Table 9-9 Continued) Particular To
Page 216 and 217:
Chichewa) and Tanzania (Swahili). O
Page 218 and 219:
Available technologies Although imp
Page 220 and 221:
and Chitedze in Malawi showed that
Page 222 and 223:
Table 10-6: Various classes of qual
Page 224 and 225:
Awareness activities Farmers’ fie
Page 226 and 227:
Annex 10-1: Target locations for pi
Page 228 and 229:
Adoption studies Adoption studies f
Page 230 and 231:
3.5 Yields (Tonnes/hectare) 3.0 2.5
Page 232 and 233:
Table 11-1: Preferred soybean trait
Page 234 and 235:
The up-scaling program signals the
Page 236 and 237:
Across districts, TGx 1740-2F out-y
Page 238 and 239:
Table 11-9: Communities and famers
Page 240 and 241:
Table 11-14 Average performance of
Page 242 and 243:
Table 11-15: Release notes of the t
Page 244 and 245:
In Nigeria, across locations mean p
Page 246 and 247:
Table 11-21: Grain yield (kg per ha
Page 248 and 249:
Progress in selection of Bradyrhizo
Page 250 and 251:
the major soybean producing localit
Page 252 and 253:
Seed Production and Delivery System
Page 254 and 255:
Table 11-29: Quantity (MT) of Found
Page 256 and 257:
utilization and marketing. In Niger
Page 258 and 259:
Annex 11-2: Tobit Model estimate of
Page 260:
show all

Four Seasons of Learning and Engaging Smallholder Farmers - icrisat

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?