Four Seasons of Learning and Engaging Smallholder Farmers - icrisat

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 2-16: Groundnut seed of various classes produced by Dharwad Center, Karnataka during 2008-10. Year Season Variety Quantity in tons Nucleus Breeder Foundation Certified TL Seed Seed Seed Seed Seed 2007-08 Post-rainy GPBD4 0.95 20.00 - 280.00 2008 Rainy GPBD4 4.80 50.00 2008-09 Post-rainy GPBD4 4.5 3.00 160.00 50.00 DH86 50.00 2009 Rainy GPBD4 DH86 2.00 4.00 172.5 34.5 - 200.00 480.00 80.00* 120.00** 2009-10 Post-Rainy GPBD4 10.00 80.00 120.00 1000.00** 10.00* 2010 Rainy GPBD4 0.80 10.00 50.00 1000.00 - Total 34.25 420.0 330.0 3010.0 210.0 *=UAS; **=KOF Table 2-17: Groundnut seed of various classes produced (MT) by Raichur Center, Karnataka in 2009 and 2010. Year / Season Class of seed Variety Location Area sown (ha) Seed quantity produced 2009 rainy Basic Seed R-2001-2 Raichur 0.20 100 kg season Rainy 2010 Nucleus R-2001-2 Raichur 1.00 200 kg Rainy 2010 Breeder R-2001-2 Raichur 4.00 1200 kg Rainy 2010 Nucleus ICGV-00350 Raichur 0.50 150 kg Post Rainy Nucleus R-2001-2 Raichur 2.00 1200 kg 2010-11 Post Rainy 2010-11 Nucleus ICGV-00350 Raichur 0.70 500 kg Post Rainy 2010-11 Breeder R-2001-2 Raichur and Kavadimattti Varietal screening to drought and foliar diseases 8.00 6000 kg During the project period, ICRISAT has made available a total of 270 new breeding lines to NARS for local evaluation; 22 and 14 sets of eight international trials were sent to UAS, Bangalore, and TNAU, Coimbatore, respectively. Twelve sets of six international trials were sent to UAS, Dharwad. Each trail consisted of 15 new breeding lines. In addition, a high oil content trial with 150 new breeding lines with high/low oil content was sent to TNAU, Coimbatore, and UAS Dharwad. From these trials conducted in Tamil Nadu, the groundnut lines ICGV 02266, ICGV 01124, ICGV 99231, ICGV 01263, ICGV 96155, ICGV 99017, and ICGV 00451 are under evaluation in state and national multi-location testing. Based on their performance in these trials they will be released at state/national level. Another 19 genotypes with high oil content were also identified for further evaluation and multi-location testing. From the trials conducted by UAS, Bangalore, the genotypes ICGV 00206, ICGV 00211 and ICGV 00189 were identified for foliar disease resistance, and ICGV 05155, ICGV 07240 and ICGV 07225 for drought tolerance, in addition to some other genotypes for confectionery traits and short / medium maturity duration. UAS-Dharwad identified the genotypes, ICGV 05056, ICGV 06142, ICGV 03032, and ICGV 06050 for high oil content and many others for various other traits. UAS-Raichur has identified ICGV 00446, ICGV 00440, ICGV 97079, ICGV 96211, ICGV 96155, ICGV 96172, ICGV 01124, ICGV 95469, ICGV 02266, ICGV 22340, ICGV 00290, ICGV 99210, and ICGV 98372 from international trials supplies by ICRISAT. The identified genotypes will be sent to multi-location testing or if required re-evaluated for another season as well as multiplied for multi-location testing in the next season. 24 Engaging Smallholder Farmers | Tropical Legumes II Project
Generation of new breeding lines At one partner center the facilities for crossing programs to generate new breeding populations were strengthened; this was made possible by erecting hybridization facilities. In the state of Karnataka, such facilities were made at Agricultural Research Station (ARS), Chintamani to expand the breeding activities. In Tamil Nadu, the breeding activities were conducted at research stations located at Tindivanam and Coimbatore. During the project period, 88 fresh crosses were made and segregating populations (F2- F5) derived from 80 crosses were studied and selections were made. In Karnataka, at ARS-Chintamani, UAS-Bangalore during the project period, 32 fresh crosses were completed and segregating generations (F2-F7) derived from 150 crosses were studied and selections made. At ARS-Bagalkot, UAS, Dharwad 71 fresh crosses were made and six segregating populations (F2-F5) were studied during the project period. At Main Agricultural Research Station (MARS), UAS- Raichur crosses were made involving 17 parents with an objective to develop varieties with foliar disease resistance and segregating populations from 23 cross combinations were studied. The fresh crosses made and breeding material handled are summarized in Table 2-18. Table 2-18: Summary of breeding material advanced breeding lines in pipeline and varieties released Partner center in India TNAU, Coimbatore UAS-Bangalore UAS-Dharwad UAS-Raichur Total number Fresh crosses made 88 32 71 189 380 Number of segregating populations (F 2 –F 7 ) studied Number of advanced breeding lines in pipeline for release Number of varieties released 80 150 6 23 259 2 (ICGV 00351; & TVG 004) 1 (ICGV 87846) 2 (ICGV 04096; & ICGV 00350 [released but notification due]) 2 (ICGV 91114; & Chintamani-2 #) 1* (ICGV 00350 [released but notification due]) 2 (GPBD 4#; & Dh 4-3#) 1 * (ICGV 00350 [released but notification due]) 2 (R 2001-2# & R 2001-2 #) 4 7 2* (R 2001-2; R 2001- 3) 3* (GPBD 4; ICGV 91114; Dh 4-3)) * Included by another partner center in the same state; # Lines developed prior to TL II Capacity building Ms D Shoba has completed her doctoral studies at TNAU, Coimbatore, and submitted her dissertation titled “Identification of molecular markers for resistance to rust (Puccinia arachidis) and late leaf spot (Phaeoisariopsis personata) in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”. The foliar disease screening facilities developed at Coimbatore under this project were used by the student for phenotyping the parents and mapping populations. Mr Sreenivasa Raghavan from UAS, Raichur completed his MSc research work under the project. Mr. K Girishkumar from TNAU, Coimbatore, Messrs. H V Krishne Gowda, M Manjunatha and Manjunatha Bhanuvally from UAS-Bangalore and Messrs, F C Nadaf and Mirza Sajiulla Baig from UAS-Raichur received hands-on training on groundnut breeding technologies and production aspects and on aspects of virus screening at ICRISAT. Two scientists Drs. M Vaidyalingan and N Manivannan from TNAU, Coimbatore were trained on the use of molecular markers in groundnut breeding at ICRISAT. Progress of Phase 1 25
Page 1 and 2: Tropical Legumes II Project TROPICA
Page 3: TROPICAL LEGUMES II Tropical Legume
Page 6 and 7: Seed Production and Delivery System
Page 8 and 9: Enhancing Pigeonpea Productivity an
Page 10 and 11: NARES NASFAM NASSPA NPT NSC NSO NSS
Page 12 and 13: TL II was implemented in 10 target
Page 14 and 15: country governments in agricultural
Page 16 and 17: Table 1-2: continued Variety code (
Page 18 and 19: Table 1-3: Seed production and deli
Page 20 and 21: As stated earlier in this chapter,
Page 22 and 23: Table 1-5: Graduate degree students
Page 24 and 25: Ndjeunga J, Ibro A, Cisse Y, Ben Ah
Page 26 and 27: Project background Groundnut is one
Page 28 and 29: Table 2-2: Performance of ICGV 0035
Page 30 and 31: Table 2-6: Performance of ICGV 9111
Page 32 and 33: Table 2-11: Results of 255 paired c
Page 36 and 37: Infrastructure facilities For effic
Page 38 and 39: Project sites Tamil Nadu The presen
Page 40 and 41: In Karnataka, the PDKV model was pr
Page 42 and 43: Training course A total of four tra
Page 44 and 45: Background The yield of groundnut i
Page 46 and 47: Table 3-2: Groundnut production tre
Page 48 and 49: In order of importance, the largest
Page 50 and 51: Table 3-5: Results of pair-wise com
Page 52 and 53: Finally, the variety choices are co
Page 54 and 55: hybridization techniques, design of
Page 56 and 57: Figure 3-2: The Malawi model of the
Page 58 and 59: Tanzania TL II has contributed to t
Page 60 and 61: Annex 3-2: Performance of Virginia
Page 62 and 63: Annex 3-4: Regional elite groundnut
Page 64 and 65: 54 Engaging Smallholder Farmers | T
Page 66 and 67: The European Union still remains th
Page 68 and 69: Table 4-2: Proportion of households
Page 70 and 71: Table 4-4: Amount requested, amount
Page 72 and 73: Table 4-6. Comparison of groundnut
Page 74 and 75: The use of other inputs (credit, in
Page 76 and 77: A PVS evaluation was launched in pi
Page 78 and 79: Table 4-10: Locations and contact f
Page 80 and 81: Table 4-11: Mean pod yield (kg per
Page 82 and 83: 99511 (Table 4-12). Most important
Page 84 and 85:
Table 4-15: Evaluation of groundnut
Page 86 and 87:
A 10-day intensive training worksho
Page 88 and 89:
Seed production of all classes A to
Page 90 and 91:
Testing seed marketing strategies A
Page 92 and 93:
as Nigeria that will face the great
Page 94 and 95:
100 Million hectares 80 60 40 20 0
Page 96 and 97:
70 73 76 79 82 85 88 91 94 97 00 03
Page 98 and 99:
In Niger, changes in cowpea product
Page 100 and 101:
irregular rainfall early in the cro
Page 102 and 103:
Table 5-4: Cowpea breeding lines se
Page 104 and 105:
Cowpea varieties released The proje
Page 106 and 107:
Table 5-8: Number of days to flower
Page 108 and 109:
Evaluation for phosphorus-use effic
Page 110 and 111:
Figure 5-8: Reactions of some culti
Page 112 and 113:
ASS6 ASS64 ASS110 ASS56 Figure 5-9:
Page 114 and 115:
Figure 5-10: Meeting of farmers’
Page 116 and 117:
The best approach to spread the imp
Page 118 and 119:
declining soil fertility, increasin
Page 120 and 121:
In Nigeria, the small seed pack app
Page 122 and 123:
112 Engaging Smallholder Farmers |
Page 124 and 125:
Phase I Social Sciences research in
Page 126 and 127:
The consequences are that the impro
Page 128 and 129:
about half of area share of land al
Page 130 and 131:
Figure 6-3: Average area (ha) per h
Page 132 and 133:
single lingering bottleneck on whic
Page 134 and 135:
In Kenya, the small seed pack appro
Page 136 and 137:
Summary, process gains and people r
Page 138 and 139:
Fast-Tracking and Technology Genera
Page 140 and 141:
Figure 6-6: Distribution of PVS sit
Page 142 and 143:
Table 6-12: Yields of fast track bu
Page 144 and 145:
Table 6-15: Farmer evaluation of in
Page 146 and 147:
While the fast track entries were r
Page 148 and 149:
Technology generation Mechanistic s
Page 150 and 151:
60 50 Rainfall Pan evaporation Maxi
Page 152 and 153:
Table 6-22: Yield under drought ind
Page 154 and 155:
Number of degree training students
Page 156 and 157:
Number of NARS technicians trained
Page 158 and 159:
Rain-out shelter in CIAT-Colombia T
Page 160 and 161:
Impact assessment and enhancement P
Page 162 and 163:
Annex 6-2: TL IIEthiopia: decentral
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
farmers for enhancing their awarene
Page 168 and 169:
• Designing, testing and implemen
Page 170 and 171:
Andhra Pradesh The overall sample s
Page 172 and 173:
Prakasam district: Crops grown in P
Page 174 and 175:
Constraints in adoption of chickpea
Page 176 and 177:
Cost-benefit analysis for chickpea
Page 178 and 179:
Identification of farmer-and-market
Page 180 and 181:
Table 7-6: Breeder Seed of differen
Page 182 and 183:
Capacity building Knowledge empower
Page 184 and 185:
Table 7-15: Training of local seed
Page 186 and 187:
• In addition to yield, maturity
Page 188 and 189:
Introduction Chickpea is grown in E
Page 190 and 191:
Chickpea seed access The first majo
Page 192 and 193:
Grades and standards About 75% of t
Page 194 and 195:
Table 8-6: Varieties used in PVS tr
Page 196 and 197:
private sector lacks the incentive
Page 198 and 199:
• LZARDI-Ukiriguru: Land along wi
Page 200 and 201:
• Establishing functional legume
Page 202 and 203:
Table 9-1: Farmers’ preferred var
Page 204 and 205:
Table 9-3: Baby trials conducted in
Page 206 and 207:
Table 9-5: Reaction of pigeonpea li
Page 208 and 209:
TL II focuses on farmer-participato
Page 210 and 211:
Production of Breeder, Foundation,
Page 212 and 213:
Mahaboobnagar and Ranga Reddy distr
Page 214 and 215:
(Table 9-9 Continued) Particular To
Page 216 and 217:
Chichewa) and Tanzania (Swahili). O
Page 218 and 219:
Available technologies Although imp
Page 220 and 221:
and Chitedze in Malawi showed that
Page 222 and 223:
Table 10-6: Various classes of qual
Page 224 and 225:
Awareness activities Farmers’ fie
Page 226 and 227:
Annex 10-1: Target locations for pi
Page 228 and 229:
Adoption studies Adoption studies f
Page 230 and 231:
3.5 Yields (Tonnes/hectare) 3.0 2.5
Page 232 and 233:
Table 11-1: Preferred soybean trait
Page 234 and 235:
The up-scaling program signals the
Page 236 and 237:
Across districts, TGx 1740-2F out-y
Page 238 and 239:
Table 11-9: Communities and famers
Page 240 and 241:
Table 11-14 Average performance of
Page 242 and 243:
Table 11-15: Release notes of the t
Page 244 and 245:
In Nigeria, across locations mean p
Page 246 and 247:
Table 11-21: Grain yield (kg per ha
Page 248 and 249:
Progress in selection of Bradyrhizo
Page 250 and 251:
the major soybean producing localit
Page 252 and 253:
Seed Production and Delivery System
Page 254 and 255:
Table 11-29: Quantity (MT) of Found
Page 256 and 257:
utilization and marketing. In Niger
Page 258 and 259:
Annex 11-2: Tobit Model estimate of
Page 260:
show all

Four Seasons of Learning and Engaging Smallholder Farmers - icrisat

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?