20.01.2014 Views

Four Seasons of Learning and Engaging Smallholder Farmers - icrisat

Four Seasons of Learning and Engaging Smallholder Farmers - icrisat

Four Seasons of Learning and Engaging Smallholder Farmers - icrisat

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Mapping (GIS) seed outlets<br />

Related to marketing - <strong>and</strong> to reach 100,000s farmers in general, a complementary project (Nodes<br />

<strong>of</strong> Growth, leveraged on TL II ) mapped the distribution <strong>of</strong> seed outlets in key drought-prone zones <strong>of</strong><br />

Kenya. Such maps help to identify areas where there is a lack <strong>of</strong> coverage.<br />

Starting with Nzaui district in Kenya, the map showed that just over 23% <strong>of</strong> the population is reached<br />

within 1- hour walk <strong>of</strong> the current seven outlets. If one new outlet were added, the population within<br />

1-hour reach rises to 38%. A further seven new outlets would have to be added to ensure that 80%<br />

<strong>of</strong> our target population has access to seed outlets. So, in brief, the current placement <strong>of</strong> agro-dealers<br />

suggests that they can serve only a small portion <strong>of</strong> the population in this particular drought-prone<br />

zone. To reach a broader segment, either more outlets have to be added, or alternative mechanisms <strong>of</strong><br />

supply have to be encouraged (such as at open markets).<br />

Select monitoring <strong>and</strong> evaluation issues<br />

An Integrated Performance Monitoring <strong>and</strong> Evaluation (IPME ) framework has been built into project<br />

operations at varied levels—with the decentralized partners, the NARS, <strong>and</strong> overall with PABRA/<br />

CIAT. Routine data on seed produced, distributed, <strong>and</strong> sold is collected, along with insights on who<br />

is being reached <strong>and</strong> where. In addition, specialized M+E is being conducted on the costs <strong>of</strong> seed<br />

production, <strong>and</strong> on the quality <strong>of</strong> seed being produced by different organizations.<br />

Cost-benefit analysis <strong>of</strong> decentralized production models<br />

Seven models were costed <strong>and</strong> their advantages <strong>and</strong> disadvantages analyzed during Phase I. The<br />

focus has been on Kenya—<strong>and</strong> included one public sector organization, two private companies, <strong>and</strong><br />

four decentralized means <strong>of</strong> production (facilitated by individuals, communities, <strong>and</strong> NGO <strong>and</strong> the<br />

government sector, respectively). Producing common bean seed proves pr<strong>of</strong>itable whether the product<br />

is certified or <strong>of</strong> ‘other quality’, but the magnitude <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>it is highly linked to yield. Currently, all modes<br />

are vulnerable to the adverse effects <strong>of</strong> drought.<br />

Seed quality monitoring<br />

Seed quality assessment research was conducted in both countries comparing samples obtained from<br />

varied formal <strong>and</strong> informal seed sector sources.<br />

In Kenya, seed was collected from trained seed bulking farmers, farmers who were secondary<br />

beneficiaries, <strong>and</strong> seed companies <strong>and</strong> parastatals involved with seed. The data from 91 farmer<br />

beneficiaries (74% women), r<strong>and</strong>omly sampled across TL II sites, proved <strong>of</strong> particular interest. Data<br />

analysis showed that 81% <strong>of</strong> farmers’ sorted seeds were <strong>of</strong> good physical quality (according to ISTA<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ards), with a germination <strong>of</strong> 86.7%, <strong>and</strong> with very good vigor.<br />

In Ethiopia, 169 bean seed samples were collected from the Oromia <strong>and</strong> SNNPRS regions, including<br />

seed samples obtained from the formal seed sector (seed companies, famers’ cooperatives unions <strong>and</strong><br />

research centers) <strong>and</strong> local markets in the areas <strong>of</strong> project intervention. Physical purity proved relatively<br />

good across samples, ranging from 89.2% to 100 % with a mean <strong>of</strong> 97.5%. Germination percentage<br />

showed a greater range, between 68 <strong>and</strong> 97.3 with a mean <strong>of</strong> 78.9%. Seed health testing was also<br />

conducted for the two most important common bean bacterial pathogens; Xanthomonas campestris pv.<br />

phaseoli <strong>and</strong> Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola. In terms <strong>of</strong> the informal sector, some common<br />

bean growers had produced seed <strong>of</strong> considerably better quality than others. There were cases where<br />

seeds obtained from the formal sector fell below the minimum st<strong>and</strong>ards. Hence, the results showed<br />

that there was no evidence to assume that seeds from the decentralized seed system are inferior to that<br />

<strong>of</strong> the seed from the formal sector.<br />

Progress <strong>of</strong> Phase 1<br />

125

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!