Four Seasons of Learning and Engaging Smallholder Farmers - icrisat

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 2-2: Performance of ICGV 00351 in on-farm trials in Erode district, Tamil Nadu Season Name of the trials No. of trials Pod yield (kg per ha) % Increase over ICGV 00351 TMV Gn13 TMV Gn 13 2009 rainy PVS trials 107 1185 868 36.5 2010 rainy Paired comparisons 103 2227 1717 29.7 Total / Mean 210 1706 1293 31.9 Table 2-3: Performance of ICGV 00351 and TVG 004 in on-farm trials in Thiruvannamalai district, Tamil Nadu, India Season Name of the trials No. of trials ICGV 00351 Pod yield (kg per ha) TVG 004 TMV Gn13 ICGV 00351 % Increase over TMV Gn 13 TVG 004 2008 rainy PVS trials 99 1429 1270 996 43.5 27.5 2009 rainy PVS trials 81 1580 1417 1293 22.2 9.6 2010 rainy comparisons 90 1890 2235 1888 - 18.4 Total / Mean 270 1633 1641 1392 17.3 17.9 Karnataka PVS trials were conducted in Chitradurga, Tumkur, Chikballpur, Bagalkot and Raipur districts of Karnataka. In the districts of Chitradurga, Tumkur, Chikballpur, 10 varieties were chosen and 117 mother and baby trials were conducted in 2008 in eight villages (Table 2-4). Of these, five varieties were advanced for the following season PVS to conduct 144 trials in 12 villages (Table 2-5). ICGV 91114 was identified as the farmer-preferred variety and paired comparisons were conducted in 33 villages in 2010 (Table 2-6). Table 2-4: Performance of varieties in PVS trials conducted in Chitradurga, Tumkur, Chikballpur districts of Karnataka in 2008 rainy season. Varieties Average pod yield (kg per ha) Gulya GulyaGollarahatti Yalagondanahalli Kaparahalli HuliKunte Jadekunte Nerlahalli Hirehalli Konasagar Average Chintamani-1 1186 1088 1078 902 706 882 1186 1098 220 946 Chintamani-2 2097 1774 1823 1431 1333 1431 1735 1548 310 1527 R-2001-2 1950 1638 1989 1441 1313 1480 2174 1470 294 1532 R-2001-3 1715 1646 1715 1333 1382 1313 1754 1274 255 1409 GPBD-4 1088 1294 1186 931 921 892 1156 1009 205 987 K-6 1029 1107 951 941 960 1196 1186 1019 202 984 ICGV-00350 1480 1303 1264 951 843 1156 1264 1226 250 1109 ICGV-04096 1989 2078 1901 1362 1088 1392 1744 1519 304 1522 ICGV-91114 1196 1392 1323 1107 872 1098 1362 960 192 1073 TMV(Gn)-13 1137 1166 1196 882 804 911 1019 1039 208 945 TMV-2 1284 1039 1382 1039 941 1196 1401 1000 200 1076 SEM + 0.68 CD at 5% 1.142 CV % 12.6 18 Engaging Smallholder Farmers | Tropical Legumes II Project
Table 2-5: Performance of varieties in PVS trials conducted during 2009 rainy season in Chitradurga, Tumkur, and Chikballpur districts of Karnataka (two mother trials and 10 Baby trials were conducted conducted at each village, total 144 trials). Varieties Average pod yield (kg per ha) Oil content average (%) Marur Jangamarahalli Hosahalli Hareyabbi G.Gollarahatti Gulya Chintamani-2 1593 1650 1421 1568 1593 1535 1600 1658 1650 1633 1544 1674 1593 53.7 R-2001-2 1699 1691 1503 1666 1698 1405 1633 1764 1682 1600 1650 1789 1648 49.7 ICGV – 00350 1356 1184 1282 1282 1209 1300 1323 1453 1307 1430 1200 1560 1324 53.9 ICGV – 04096 1747 1664 1764 1690 1756 1886 1796 1895 1764 1870 1634 2017 1790 54.4 ICGV- 91114 1397 1502 1363 1372 1552 1487 1511 1642 1470 1502 1445 1641 1490 48.2 TMV-2 1103 1119 988 1118 1242 1102 1274 1323 1200 1201 1176 1315 1180 51.3 Hire halli Chikkahalli Rudrammanahalli KondlaHalli Nerlahalli Marammanahalli Average SEM +1.13 CD 2.62 CV 17.90 In eight villages of Bagalkot district, 34 mother and baby trials were conducted in 2008 with a set of eight chosen varieties (Table 2-7). In 2009, a set of 20 mother and baby trials were conducted in six villages from the identified five varieties (Table 2-8). In 2010, a total of 192 paired comparisons with the identified variety ICGV 00350 and locally preferred variety TMV 2 were conducted (Table 2-9). In Raichur district, 54 mother and baby trials were conducted with nine chosen varieties in 2008, from which six were selected for the next season testing and in 2009 (Table 2-10). Based on these two entries, ICGV 00350 and R-2001-2 were identified for paired comparisons in 2010. A total of 255 paired comparisons were conducted in 17 villages (Table 2-11). Multi-location testing: Nine varieties were identified through PVS from the two states. These varieties were multiplied and entered into multi-location testing at state and national levels. This testing is a prerequisite for official release of the varieties. They are now in different states of release and prerelease at state and national levels as indicated in Table 2-12. Awareness about varieties: In both the states where the project is implemented, over 5,000 farmers were made aware of improved varieties by directly reaching them either through PVS and comparison trials (1,857 farmers) or through farmers’ visits to these trial plots on field days. A total of 87 field days on farmers’ fields were conducted in which 5,456 farmers have participated. In Tamil Nadu, over 6,000 farmers were made aware of improved groundnut varieties. One thousand thirty eight farmers were made aware as participant of PVS and paired comparisons and another 871 farmers were made aware of improved varieties through 18 field days conducted in farmers’ fields. In addition, 5,531 farmers were reached through state and regional farmers’ fairs (Table 2-13). In five districts of Karnataka over 5,000 farmers were directly reached and made aware of improved varieties; 819 farmers were reached through participation in the PVS and paired comparisons and another 4,585 farmers from the nearby villages visited the farmers plots where improved varieties were cultivated during 69 field days conducted over three years. Progress of Phase 1 19
Page 1 and 2: Tropical Legumes II Project TROPICA
Page 3: TROPICAL LEGUMES II Tropical Legume
Page 6 and 7: Seed Production and Delivery System
Page 8 and 9: Enhancing Pigeonpea Productivity an
Page 10 and 11: NARES NASFAM NASSPA NPT NSC NSO NSS
Page 12 and 13: TL II was implemented in 10 target
Page 14 and 15: country governments in agricultural
Page 16 and 17: Table 1-2: continued Variety code (
Page 18 and 19: Table 1-3: Seed production and deli
Page 20 and 21: As stated earlier in this chapter,
Page 22 and 23: Table 1-5: Graduate degree students
Page 24 and 25: Ndjeunga J, Ibro A, Cisse Y, Ben Ah
Page 26 and 27: Project background Groundnut is one
Page 30 and 31: Table 2-6: Performance of ICGV 9111
Page 32 and 33: Table 2-11: Results of 255 paired c
Page 34 and 35: Table 2-16: Groundnut seed of vario
Page 36 and 37: Infrastructure facilities For effic
Page 38 and 39: Project sites Tamil Nadu The presen
Page 40 and 41: In Karnataka, the PDKV model was pr
Page 42 and 43: Training course A total of four tra
Page 44 and 45: Background The yield of groundnut i
Page 46 and 47: Table 3-2: Groundnut production tre
Page 48 and 49: In order of importance, the largest
Page 50 and 51: Table 3-5: Results of pair-wise com
Page 52 and 53: Finally, the variety choices are co
Page 54 and 55: hybridization techniques, design of
Page 56 and 57: Figure 3-2: The Malawi model of the
Page 58 and 59: Tanzania TL II has contributed to t
Page 60 and 61: Annex 3-2: Performance of Virginia
Page 62 and 63: Annex 3-4: Regional elite groundnut
Page 64 and 65: 54 Engaging Smallholder Farmers | T
Page 66 and 67: The European Union still remains th
Page 68 and 69: Table 4-2: Proportion of households
Page 70 and 71: Table 4-4: Amount requested, amount
Page 72 and 73: Table 4-6. Comparison of groundnut
Page 74 and 75: The use of other inputs (credit, in
Page 76 and 77: A PVS evaluation was launched in pi
Page 78 and 79:
Table 4-10: Locations and contact f
Page 80 and 81:
Table 4-11: Mean pod yield (kg per
Page 82 and 83:
99511 (Table 4-12). Most important
Page 84 and 85:
Table 4-15: Evaluation of groundnut
Page 86 and 87:
A 10-day intensive training worksho
Page 88 and 89:
Seed production of all classes A to
Page 90 and 91:
Testing seed marketing strategies A
Page 92 and 93:
as Nigeria that will face the great
Page 94 and 95:
100 Million hectares 80 60 40 20 0
Page 96 and 97:
70 73 76 79 82 85 88 91 94 97 00 03
Page 98 and 99:
In Niger, changes in cowpea product
Page 100 and 101:
irregular rainfall early in the cro
Page 102 and 103:
Table 5-4: Cowpea breeding lines se
Page 104 and 105:
Cowpea varieties released The proje
Page 106 and 107:
Table 5-8: Number of days to flower
Page 108 and 109:
Evaluation for phosphorus-use effic
Page 110 and 111:
Figure 5-8: Reactions of some culti
Page 112 and 113:
ASS6 ASS64 ASS110 ASS56 Figure 5-9:
Page 114 and 115:
Figure 5-10: Meeting of farmers’
Page 116 and 117:
The best approach to spread the imp
Page 118 and 119:
declining soil fertility, increasin
Page 120 and 121:
In Nigeria, the small seed pack app
Page 122 and 123:
112 Engaging Smallholder Farmers |
Page 124 and 125:
Phase I Social Sciences research in
Page 126 and 127:
The consequences are that the impro
Page 128 and 129:
about half of area share of land al
Page 130 and 131:
Figure 6-3: Average area (ha) per h
Page 132 and 133:
single lingering bottleneck on whic
Page 134 and 135:
In Kenya, the small seed pack appro
Page 136 and 137:
Summary, process gains and people r
Page 138 and 139:
Fast-Tracking and Technology Genera
Page 140 and 141:
Figure 6-6: Distribution of PVS sit
Page 142 and 143:
Table 6-12: Yields of fast track bu
Page 144 and 145:
Table 6-15: Farmer evaluation of in
Page 146 and 147:
While the fast track entries were r
Page 148 and 149:
Technology generation Mechanistic s
Page 150 and 151:
60 50 Rainfall Pan evaporation Maxi
Page 152 and 153:
Table 6-22: Yield under drought ind
Page 154 and 155:
Number of degree training students
Page 156 and 157:
Number of NARS technicians trained
Page 158 and 159:
Rain-out shelter in CIAT-Colombia T
Page 160 and 161:
Impact assessment and enhancement P
Page 162 and 163:
Annex 6-2: TL IIEthiopia: decentral
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
farmers for enhancing their awarene
Page 168 and 169:
• Designing, testing and implemen
Page 170 and 171:
Andhra Pradesh The overall sample s
Page 172 and 173:
Prakasam district: Crops grown in P
Page 174 and 175:
Constraints in adoption of chickpea
Page 176 and 177:
Cost-benefit analysis for chickpea
Page 178 and 179:
Identification of farmer-and-market
Page 180 and 181:
Table 7-6: Breeder Seed of differen
Page 182 and 183:
Capacity building Knowledge empower
Page 184 and 185:
Table 7-15: Training of local seed
Page 186 and 187:
• In addition to yield, maturity
Page 188 and 189:
Introduction Chickpea is grown in E
Page 190 and 191:
Chickpea seed access The first majo
Page 192 and 193:
Grades and standards About 75% of t
Page 194 and 195:
Table 8-6: Varieties used in PVS tr
Page 196 and 197:
private sector lacks the incentive
Page 198 and 199:
• LZARDI-Ukiriguru: Land along wi
Page 200 and 201:
• Establishing functional legume
Page 202 and 203:
Table 9-1: Farmers’ preferred var
Page 204 and 205:
Table 9-3: Baby trials conducted in
Page 206 and 207:
Table 9-5: Reaction of pigeonpea li
Page 208 and 209:
TL II focuses on farmer-participato
Page 210 and 211:
Production of Breeder, Foundation,
Page 212 and 213:
Mahaboobnagar and Ranga Reddy distr
Page 214 and 215:
(Table 9-9 Continued) Particular To
Page 216 and 217:
Chichewa) and Tanzania (Swahili). O
Page 218 and 219:
Available technologies Although imp
Page 220 and 221:
and Chitedze in Malawi showed that
Page 222 and 223:
Table 10-6: Various classes of qual
Page 224 and 225:
Awareness activities Farmers’ fie
Page 226 and 227:
Annex 10-1: Target locations for pi
Page 228 and 229:
Adoption studies Adoption studies f
Page 230 and 231:
3.5 Yields (Tonnes/hectare) 3.0 2.5
Page 232 and 233:
Table 11-1: Preferred soybean trait
Page 234 and 235:
The up-scaling program signals the
Page 236 and 237:
Across districts, TGx 1740-2F out-y
Page 238 and 239:
Table 11-9: Communities and famers
Page 240 and 241:
Table 11-14 Average performance of
Page 242 and 243:
Table 11-15: Release notes of the t
Page 244 and 245:
In Nigeria, across locations mean p
Page 246 and 247:
Table 11-21: Grain yield (kg per ha
Page 248 and 249:
Progress in selection of Bradyrhizo
Page 250 and 251:
the major soybean producing localit
Page 252 and 253:
Seed Production and Delivery System
Page 254 and 255:
Table 11-29: Quantity (MT) of Found
Page 256 and 257:
utilization and marketing. In Niger
Page 258 and 259:
Annex 11-2: Tobit Model estimate of
Page 260:
show all

Four Seasons of Learning and Engaging Smallholder Farmers - icrisat

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?