27.10.2014 Views

Routledge History of Philosophy Volume IV

Routledge History of Philosophy Volume IV

Routledge History of Philosophy Volume IV

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

106 SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS UP TO DESCARTES<br />

But Tycho’s theorizing was <strong>of</strong> less scientific importance than his practice. He<br />

was unusual among men <strong>of</strong> science in being <strong>of</strong> aristocratic birth, and this made<br />

substantial patronage easier to obtain. The King <strong>of</strong> Denmark granted him the<br />

island <strong>of</strong> Hveen (situated between Copenhagen and Elsinore), on which he built<br />

a magnificent observatory called Uraniborg. Up to that time it could only have<br />

been rivalled by Islamic or Mongol observatories, such as those at Maragha and<br />

Samarkand. Not only was the hardware, so to speak, superb, but Tycho had it<br />

manned by a group <strong>of</strong> able assistants whom he at least tried to rule with a rod <strong>of</strong><br />

iron. The result was an incomparably accurate collection <strong>of</strong> observations <strong>of</strong><br />

stellar positions, which historically was to play a far more significant role than<br />

his famous demonstrations that the New Star (to us a supernova) <strong>of</strong> 1572 and the<br />

comet <strong>of</strong> 1577 were supralunary, and hence symptoms <strong>of</strong> change in supposedly<br />

immutable regions, and that the latter would have to be passing through the solid<br />

spheres <strong>of</strong> Aristotelian cosmology. Nevertheless these made important dents in<br />

the old world picture, although ironically Galileo denied the validity <strong>of</strong> his<br />

arguments with regard to the comet.<br />

There is a waggish yet revealing quip that Tycho’s most important discovery<br />

<strong>of</strong> all was that <strong>of</strong> a person, namely Johann Kepler. Kepler was born into a<br />

Lutheran family, and was himself heading for the Lutheran ministry when he<br />

entered the University <strong>of</strong> Tubingen in 1587. 21 However, his course was deflected<br />

by a growing interest in astronomy, fostered by one <strong>of</strong> his teachers, Michael<br />

Maestlin, who happened to be one <strong>of</strong> the few convinced Copernicans <strong>of</strong> the era,<br />

and in 1594 with Maestlin’s encouragement Kepler accepted the post <strong>of</strong> District<br />

Mathematician at Graz. His duties involved some elementary mathematical<br />

teaching and the drawing up <strong>of</strong> astrological prognostications, but he also pursued<br />

his own theoretical interests in astronomy, and in 1596 published a small book<br />

entitled Mysterium Cosmographicum. It could be tempting to pass this book over<br />

as merely ‘quaint’ were it not for Kepler’s much later claim that,<br />

Just as if it had been literally dictated to me, an oracle fallen from heaven,<br />

all the principal chapters <strong>of</strong> the published booklet were immediately<br />

recognised as most true by the discerning (which is the wont <strong>of</strong> God’s<br />

manifest works), and have these twenty-five years carried before me more<br />

than a single torch in accomplishing the design (initiated by the most<br />

celebrated astronomer Tycho Brahe <strong>of</strong> the Danish nobility) <strong>of</strong> the<br />

restoration <strong>of</strong> astronomy, and, moreover, almost anything <strong>of</strong> the books <strong>of</strong><br />

astronomy that I have produced since that time could be referred to one or<br />

other <strong>of</strong> the chapters set forth in this booklet, <strong>of</strong> which it would contain<br />

either an illustration or a completion. 22<br />

And an attentive reading shows that much <strong>of</strong> this was indeed the case.<br />

In the book Kepler reveals himself as one who would out-Copernicize<br />

Copernicus in his belief in the physical reality <strong>of</strong> a heliocentric system, and this<br />

attitude is reinforced by a commitment to asking why, and answering it in terms

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!