27.10.2014 Views

Routledge History of Philosophy Volume IV

Routledge History of Philosophy Volume IV

Routledge History of Philosophy Volume IV

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

RENAISSANCE AND SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY RATIONALISM 381<br />

RB<br />

P.Remnant and J.Bennett (trans. and eds) G.W.Leibniz: New<br />

Essays on Human Understanding (Cambridge, 1981)<br />

I have generally followed the cited translations; any significant modifications are<br />

indicated in the notes.<br />

NOTES<br />

1 See, for example, NE <strong>IV</strong>.viii, A VI.vi, RB 431.<br />

2 Leibniz to Remond, 10 January 1714, G III 607.<br />

3 See J.Bennett, A Study <strong>of</strong> Spinoza’s Ethics (Cambridge, Cambridge University<br />

Press, 1984), pp. 55–6.<br />

4 Aristotle, Categories, ch. 5, 43.<br />

5 Discourse on Metaphysics 8, G <strong>IV</strong> 432, L 307.<br />

6 ibid., G <strong>IV</strong> 433, L 307.<br />

7 Leibniz to Arnauld, 30 April 1687, G II 96–7, MP 121.<br />

8 Sleigh [11.27], 123.<br />

9 cf. Bennett, op. cit., p. 58.<br />

10 Leibniz to Arnauld, 30 April 1687, G II 100–1, MP 126.<br />

11 Strictly speaking, for Descartes, there is only one body or extended substance: the<br />

entire physical universe.<br />

12 See Sleigh [11.27], 98–101.<br />

13 See Broad [11.29], 49–51.<br />

14 Leibniz to Arnauld, 30 April 1687, G II 101, MP 126.<br />

15 Arnauld to Leibniz, 4 March 1687, G II 86, MP 107.<br />

16 Leibniz to Arnauld, 30 April 1687, G II 97, MP 121.<br />

17 Arnauld to Leibniz, 4 March 1687, G II 87–8, MP 109.<br />

18 Leibniz to Arnauld, 30 April 1687, G II 100, MP 125–6.<br />

19 Discourse on Metaphysics 8, G <strong>IV</strong> 433, L 307.<br />

20 Russell [11.38]; Couturat [11.43]; Couturat [11.44],<br />

21 ‘First Truths’, C 521, L 269. (Translation modified.)<br />

22 See, for example, M.Ayers, ‘Analytical <strong>Philosophy</strong> and the <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Philosophy</strong>’,<br />

in J.Rée, M.Ayers and A.Westoby, <strong>Philosophy</strong> and its Past (Brighton, Harvester,<br />

1978), p. 45. See also B.Brody, ‘Leibniz’s Metaphysical Logic’, in Kulstad [11.<br />

34], 43–55.<br />

23 Aristotle, Metaphysics 1011 b 27.<br />

24 Leibniz to Arnauld, 14 July 1686, G II 56, MP 63.<br />

25 As Arnauld noted (Arnauld to Leibniz, 13 March 1686, G II 15, MP 9), these<br />

remarkable doctrines <strong>of</strong> Leibniz’s logic raise a number <strong>of</strong> puzzles concerning<br />

freedom and contingency. On these see, for example, Sleigh [11.27].<br />

26 Discourse on Metaphysics 9, G <strong>IV</strong> 433, L 308.<br />

27 Leibniz’s Fourth Paper to Clarke, G VII 372, L 687.<br />

28 See Parkinson [11.58], 6–8.<br />

29 Leibniz to Arnauld, 9 October 1687, G II 112, MP 144.<br />

30 Discourse on Metaphysics 8, G <strong>IV</strong> 433, L 308. (Translation modified.)<br />

31 See Broad [11.29], 24–5.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!