27.10.2014 Views

Routledge History of Philosophy Volume IV

Routledge History of Philosophy Volume IV

Routledge History of Philosophy Volume IV

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

404 GLOSSARY<br />

Remonstrants:<br />

resolutio:<br />

scepticism:<br />

scholasticism:<br />

semantics:<br />

sublunary:<br />

schemes. For example, a philosopher might argue that<br />

propositions about societies can be ‘reduced’ to<br />

propositions about the individuals who constitute<br />

them; that, in other words, a society is nothing but a<br />

collection <strong>of</strong> individuals.<br />

see ‘Arminianism’.<br />

a Latin term for the Greek word ‘analysis’. See<br />

‘analysis and synthesis’.<br />

if one says <strong>of</strong> a man that he is sceptical about (say)<br />

the existence <strong>of</strong> Robin Hood, one means that he does<br />

not go so far as to assert that there was no such person,<br />

but rather that he holds that the evidence brought to<br />

support the assertion that Robin Hood existed does<br />

not satisfy the required standards. Philosophical<br />

scepticism is distinguished by the fact that the<br />

philosophical sceptic casts doubt on a whole range <strong>of</strong><br />

assertions. For example, a philosophical sceptic<br />

might say that the evidence brought to support any<br />

assertion about the past can never be adequate.<br />

a term sometimes used to mean Western medieval<br />

Christian philosophy as a whole. In a more precise<br />

sense, however, ‘scholasticism’ refers to only a part<br />

<strong>of</strong> such philosophy, namely the philosophical<br />

movement that began in cathedral schools in the<br />

eleventh century AD and reached its peak in the<br />

universities <strong>of</strong> Paris and Oxford in the thirteenth and<br />

fourteenth centuries. Such philosophy relied heavily<br />

on ancient thought, and especially (though by no<br />

means exclusively) on the philosophy <strong>of</strong> Aristotle.<br />

the study <strong>of</strong> meaning, <strong>of</strong>ten regarded as one part <strong>of</strong><br />

‘semiotics’, the general theory <strong>of</strong> signs. Other parts<br />

<strong>of</strong> semiotics are syntactics, namely the study <strong>of</strong> the<br />

grammar and syntax <strong>of</strong> language, and pragmatics, the<br />

study <strong>of</strong> the purposes and effects <strong>of</strong> language.<br />

the Aristotelian universe was a system <strong>of</strong> concentric<br />

spheres, with a spherical earth at rest in the centre.<br />

Around the earth there rotated invisible spheres,<br />

carrying the Sun, Moon, planets and stars. The region<br />

within the sphere <strong>of</strong> the Moon was known as the<br />

‘sublunary’ world. It consisted <strong>of</strong> the four elements<br />

(earth, air, water and fire), which constantly pass into<br />

each other. It was distinguished from the<br />

‘superlunary’ world <strong>of</strong> the heavens, the matter <strong>of</strong><br />

which is <strong>of</strong> a distinct type, the so-called

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!