Routledge History of Philosophy Volume IV

48 THE PHILOSOPHY OF THE ITALIAN RENAISSANCE
60 Bruni [1.46], vol. 2, 148 (IX.4), described the translation as very inept; see also
Garin in Medioevo [1.13], vol. 1, 341–4; Hankins in Hankins et al. [1.8], 149–88,
esp. 149–60.
61 Hankins [1.95], vol. 1, 105–54, vol. 2, 548–75; Garin in Medioevo [1.13], vol. 1,
347–57. A third version of the Republic was undertaken by the Sicilian humanist
Antonio Cassarino (d. 1447): Hankins [1.95], vol. 1, 154–60.
62 Hankins in Hankins et al. [1.8], 166–76.
63 Kraye [1.98]; Hankins [1.95], vol. 2, 515–23.
64 See, for example, his lectures on the Ethics in Müllner [1.51], 15, 20, 22–3; see also
Garin [1.5], 119–20; Field [1.92], 107–26.
65 George of Trebizond [1.49], 304; Klibansky [1.97], 289–94; Monfasani [1.103], 18–
19, 167; Garin in Medioevo [1.13], 372–3.
66 See p. 22 above.
67 George of Trebizond [1.49], 198–202 (Preface), 746–7 (marginal notes); see also
Monfasani [1.103], 102–3, 171–2 and appendix 10 (for the original Preface to
Nicholas V); Hankins [1.95], vol. 2, appendix 11.
68 Woodhouse [1.105]; Mohler [1.102], vol. 1, 335–40.
69 Plethon [1.84], 321, trans. in Plethon [1.87], 192; see also Woodhouse [1.105], ch.
10.
70 Plethon [1.84], 321–2, 327–8, trans. in Plethon [1.87], 192–3, 198–9; Monfasani [1.
103], 157, 205–6.
71 Plethon [1.83], Woodhouse [1.105], ch. 17; Webb [1.104]; Hankins [1.95], vol. 1,
193–208.
72 Plethon [1.83], 64–79 (II.6); Woodhouse [1.105], 332–4. This portion of the
treatise circulated independently in the West under the title De fato and was
translated into Latin for Nicholas of Cusa: Kristeller [1.100].
73 Woodhouse [1.105], chs 13 and 15.
74 George of Trebizond [1.80], V vi v ; see also Monfasani [1.103], 39.
75 George of Trebizond [1.80], D ii r –Niii r ; see also Hankins [1.95], vol. 2, appendix
14; Monfasani [1.103], 157; Labowsky [1.101], 175–6.
76 George of Trebizond [1.80], T v r –X ii v ; Monfasani [1.103], 159; Garin [1.6], 290–
2.
77 Monfasani [1.103], 179–94; for his earlier spell in jail see note 37 above.
78 Gaza [1.79]; for his Adversus Plethonem de substantia see Mohler [1.102], vol. 3,
153–8.
79 Labowsky [1.101], 180, 194; see also p. 23. Argyropulos also wrote a refutation of
the Comparatio, which is now lost: Monfasani [1.103], 212, 228.
80 Labowsky [1.101], 180–4, 194–7.
81 Labowsky [1.101], 180, 194. Bessarion’s critique of George’s translation occurs in
Book V, which is not printed in the edition of Bessarion’s treatise in Mohler [1.
102], vol. 2; see Hankins [1.95], vol. 1, 191; Garin [1.6], 287.
82 Bessarion in Mohler [1.102], vol. 2, 72–3 (I.7), 90–3 (II.4), 154–5 (II.9), 410–13
(III.28); see also Hankins [1.95], vol. 1, 246–7; Monfasani [1.103], 219–20.
83 Bessarion in Mohler [1.102], vol. 2, 3 (I.1), 102–3, 109 (II.5), 282–95 (III.15).
84 Bessarion in Mohler [1.102], vol. 2, 161–3 (II.8), 443–59 (IV.2), 467 (IV.2); see
also Hankins [1.95], vol. 1, 255–9, vol. 2, appendix 13.
85 Ficino’s letter is published in Mohler [1.102], vol. 3, 544–5, as are the letters of
Argyropulos (545–6) and Filelfo (599–600). On Ficino see Kristeller [1.