27.10.2014 Views

Routledge History of Philosophy Volume IV

Routledge History of Philosophy Volume IV

Routledge History of Philosophy Volume IV

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

50 THE PHILOSOPHY OF THE ITALIAN RENAISSANCE<br />

107 Ficino [1.70], vol. 1, 956, vol. 2, 1533 (Argumentum in sextam epistolam Platonis);<br />

see also Allen [1.90]; but see Pico’s criticism <strong>of</strong> Ficino in note 144 below.<br />

108 Kristeller in Olivieri [1.15], vol. 2, 1077–99, esp. 1080–4; Kristeller [1.11], ch. 5.<br />

109 Pomponazzi [1.114]; Pomponazzi [1.115]; see also Nardi [1.127], ch. 4; Di Napoli<br />

[1.3], 229–34.<br />

110 Nardi [1.127], 197–9; Di Napoli [1.3], 235–8; Olivieri [1.128], 69–76.<br />

111 Pomponazzi [1.112], 36–7, 82–137; see also Aristotle, De anima I.1, III.7; Di<br />

Napoli [1.3], 245–64; Olivieri [1.128], 76–84.<br />

112 Pomponazzi [1.119], 302, 377; Pomponazzi [1.112], 82, 232; see also Pine [1.129],<br />

109–12.<br />

113 Pomponazzi [1.110], 52–75 (Apologia), 81–108 (Defensorium); see also Di Napoli<br />

[1.3], 265–75; Schmitt and Skinner [1.17], 504–7.<br />

114 Schmitt and Skinner [1.17], 602–5; Lohr [1.125].<br />

115 Pomponazzi [1.111], 198; see also Pine [1.129], 235–53; Schmitt and Skinner [1.<br />

17], 273. The treatise, written c. 1520, was published posthumously in 1556; it was<br />

the only work by Pomponazzi to be put on the Index.<br />

116 The astrological determinism postulated by Pomponazzi in De incantationibus was<br />

reiterated in Books I and II <strong>of</strong> his De fato (Pomponazzi [1.113], in which he attempts<br />

to refute Alexander <strong>of</strong> Aphrodisias’s defence <strong>of</strong> contingency.<br />

117 Pomponazzi [1.111], 315; see also Pine [1.129], 256–8; Kristeller in Olivieri [1.<br />

15], vol. 2, 1093–6.<br />

118 De Bellis [1.122]; Branca [1.60], 225.<br />

119 Schmitt [1.134]; Kraye [1.124]; Cranz [1.120]; Nardi [1.14], 365–442; Mahoney [1.<br />

126]; Schmitt [1.135].<br />

120 Cranz [1.121].<br />

121 Aristotle [1.106], vol. 1, A A II 2 v –3 r ; see also Schmitt [1.132]; Minio-Paluello [1.<br />

67], 498–500.<br />

122 Zabarella [1.117], 178–9 (De methodis III.18); see also Gilbert [1.7], ch. 7; Poppi<br />

[1.130], ch. 6.<br />

123 Zabarella [1.117], 180–1 (De methodis III. 19); see also Schmitt and Skinner [1.<br />

17], 689–93.<br />

124 Zabarella [1.118], 69, 541–56, 1056, 1067, 1069; see also Schmitt [1.131]; Poppi<br />

[1.130], ch. 7.<br />

125 Cesalpino [1.108]; his treatise on minerals and metals, De metallicis (1596), also<br />

makes use <strong>of</strong> observational material.<br />

126 Zabarella [1.118], 1004 (De speciebus intelligibilibus 8); see also Schmitt and<br />

Skinner [1.17], 530–4.<br />

127 Cremonini [1.109], † 3 r ; see also Schmitt [1.133], 15; Schmitt [1.16], 101–12, 33,<br />

138; Dizionario [1.4], vol. 30, 618–22.<br />

128 Another late Aristotelian, Francesco Buonamici (1533–1603), one <strong>of</strong> Galileo’s<br />

teachers at the University <strong>of</strong> Pisa, was equally insistent on the separation <strong>of</strong><br />

philosophy and religion: Buonamici [1.107], 810; see also Helbing [1.123], 65.<br />

129 Viviani [1.116], 610; see also Schmitt [1.133], 14; Kessler in Henry and Hutton [1.<br />

9], 137–4, esp. 141; Lohr [1.125], 99.<br />

130 Valla [1.159], vol. 1, 1–8 (I, proemium), 128–9 (I.16), 148 (I.17), 175–6 (II,<br />

proemium), 277–8 (III, proemium); see also Camporeale [1.171]; Seigel [1.18], ch.<br />

5; Vasoli [1.19], 28–77; Monfasani [1.185], 181–5; Copenhaver and Schmitt [1.2],

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!