27.10.2014 Views

Routledge History of Philosophy Volume IV

Routledge History of Philosophy Volume IV

Routledge History of Philosophy Volume IV

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 5<br />

Descartes: methodology<br />

Stephen Gaukroger<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The seventeenth century is <strong>of</strong>ten referred to as the century <strong>of</strong> the Scientific<br />

Revolution, a time <strong>of</strong> fundamental scientific change in which traditional theories<br />

were either replaced by new ones or radically transformed. Descartes made<br />

contributions to virtually every scientific area <strong>of</strong> his day. He was one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

founders <strong>of</strong> algebra, he discovered fundamental laws in geometrical optics, his<br />

natural philosophy was the natural philosophy in the seventeenth century before<br />

the appearance <strong>of</strong> Newton’s Principia (Newton himself was a Cartesian before<br />

he developed his own natural philosophy) and his work in biology and<br />

physiology resulted, amongst other things, in the discovery <strong>of</strong> reflex action. 1<br />

Descartes’s earliest interests were scientific, and he seems to have thought his<br />

scientific work <strong>of</strong> greater importance than his metaphysical writings throughout<br />

his career. In a conversation with Burman, recorded in 1648, he remarked:<br />

A point to note is that you should not devote so much effort to the<br />

Meditations and to metaphysical questions, or give them elaborate<br />

treatment in commentaries and the like. Still less should one do what some<br />

try to do, and dig more deeply into these questions than the author did: he<br />

has dealt with them all quite deeply enough. It is sufficient to have grasped<br />

them once in a general way, and then to remember the conclusion.<br />

Otherwise they draw the mind too far away from physical and observable<br />

things, and make it unfit to study them. Yet it is just these physical studies<br />

that it is most desirable for men to pursue, since they would yield abundant<br />

benefits for life. 2<br />

Despite this, Descartes has <strong>of</strong>ten been considered a metaphysician in natural<br />

philosophy, deriving physical truths from metaphysical first principles. Indeed,<br />

there is still a widespread view that the ‘method’ Descartes espoused is the a<br />

priori one <strong>of</strong> deduction from first principles, where these first principles are<br />

truths <strong>of</strong> reason. This view has two principal sources: an image <strong>of</strong> Descartes as<br />

the de facto founder <strong>of</strong> a philosophical school—‘rationalism’—in which

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!