27.10.2014 Views

Routledge History of Philosophy Volume IV

Routledge History of Philosophy Volume IV

Routledge History of Philosophy Volume IV

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GLOSSARY 391<br />

cause, efficient:<br />

cause, final:<br />

cause, primary and<br />

secondary:<br />

cause, procatarctic:<br />

cause, proximate and<br />

remote:<br />

common notions:<br />

logical consequence <strong>of</strong> E. The most famous exponent<br />

<strong>of</strong> this theory was Spinoza.<br />

a translation <strong>of</strong> ‘causa efficiens’, a term which was<br />

used by medieval philosophers and which was still in<br />

use in the seventeenth century. The term goes back to<br />

Aristotle, who stated that an ‘efficient’ cause is a<br />

source <strong>of</strong> change or <strong>of</strong> coming to rest (Physics, II, 3).<br />

So, for example, a man who gives advice is an<br />

efficient cause, and a father is the efficient cause <strong>of</strong><br />

his child.<br />

a term that renders the Latin ‘causa finalis’. ‘Final’<br />

does not mean here last or ultimate, as when one<br />

speaks <strong>of</strong> a ‘final curtain’. Rather, a final cause is that<br />

for the sake <strong>of</strong> which something is done. The term<br />

goes back to Aristotle, who said that a final cause is<br />

an end: e.g. health is the final cause <strong>of</strong> taking a walk<br />

(Physics, II, 3). See also ‘teleology’.<br />

as explained in a seventeenth-century textbook <strong>of</strong><br />

logic, a ‘primary cause’ is one which produces an<br />

effect by its own power; a ‘secondary cause’ is one<br />

which, in various ways, assists in the production <strong>of</strong><br />

the effect (Heereboord, Hermeneia Logica (1650),<br />

pp. 106–9).<br />

a term derived from the Greek ‘prokatarktikos’,<br />

‘antecedent’. A procatarctic cause was regarded as<br />

one kind <strong>of</strong> secondary cause (q.v.); it is external to a<br />

primary cause, and excites it to action.<br />

a proximate cause is one which is immediately prior<br />

to the effect. Thus, if a billiard ball B moves because<br />

it is struck by billiard ball A, the impact <strong>of</strong> A on B is<br />

the proximate cause <strong>of</strong> the movement <strong>of</strong> B. The<br />

movement <strong>of</strong> A is itself the effect <strong>of</strong> some other cause<br />

or causes, say the movement <strong>of</strong> the cue which strikes<br />

A. In such a case, the movement <strong>of</strong> the cue will be the<br />

proximate cause <strong>of</strong> the movement <strong>of</strong> A, and the<br />

remote cause <strong>of</strong> the movement <strong>of</strong> B.<br />

a translation <strong>of</strong> the Latin term ‘notiones communes’,<br />

which is in turn a translation <strong>of</strong> the Greek ‘koinai<br />

ennoai’, by which Euclid referred to the axioms <strong>of</strong> his<br />

geometry. The term is used by both Descartes and<br />

Spinoza, who also employ the term ‘axioma’, a Latin<br />

version <strong>of</strong> a Greek word whose use in mathematics is<br />

mentioned by Aristotle (Metaphysics, Book Gamma,<br />

ch. 3).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!