27.10.2014 Views

Routledge History of Philosophy Volume IV

Routledge History of Philosophy Volume IV

Routledge History of Philosophy Volume IV

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

108 SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS UP TO DESCARTES<br />

was traditional in at first seeking for a circular orbit and reintroducing an equant<br />

point, although not necessarily at the same distance as the Sun from the centre <strong>of</strong><br />

the orbit. In this manner he formed a developed theory, which he later called his<br />

‘vicarious hypothesis’; it became especially famous for a crucial deviation <strong>of</strong><br />

eight minutes <strong>of</strong> arc from observational evidence, which would previously have<br />

been undetectable.<br />

Since the divine goodness has given to us in Tycho Brahe a most careful<br />

observer, from whose observations the error <strong>of</strong> 8 minutes in the Ptolemaic<br />

account (calculus) is argued in Mars, it is fitting that with grateful mind we<br />

should recognise and cultivate this gift <strong>of</strong> God…. For if I had treated these<br />

8 minutes <strong>of</strong> longitude as negligible, I should already have sufficiently<br />

corrected the hypothesis…. But because they could not be neglected, these<br />

eight minutes alone have led the way to reforming the whole <strong>of</strong> astronomy,<br />

and have been made the matter for a great part <strong>of</strong> this work. 23<br />

With the vicarious hypothesis rejected, Kepler embarked on a bewildering<br />

variety <strong>of</strong> sophisticated procedures. One strategy was to place the Earth more on<br />

a par with the other planets; for it provided the moving platform from which we<br />

observed, but hitherto its orbit had lacked an equant point. To this end Kepler<br />

found it useful to imagine that he was on Mars and observing the Earth from<br />

there. Another strategy was that <strong>of</strong> quantifying the causes <strong>of</strong> the<br />

planetary motions. A force emanating from the Sun, and inversely proportional<br />

to the distance from the Sun, was conceived as pushing the planets around. This<br />

eventually led to what we know as Kepler’s second law <strong>of</strong> planetary motion, that<br />

the radius vector from the Sun to a planet sweeps out equal areas in equal times.<br />

But this force did not explain a planet’s varying distance from the Sun. For this<br />

purpose a quasi-magnetic push-pull force was introduced with allusion to<br />

William Gilbert’s De magnete which had been published in 1600. This caused a<br />

libration <strong>of</strong> the planet on an epicycle’s diameter directed towards the Sun. With<br />

this theoretical apparatus Kepler proceeded to seek the actual path <strong>of</strong> Mars. For<br />

this he experimented with a variety <strong>of</strong> egg-shaped orbits. Readers <strong>of</strong> Gulliver’s<br />

Travels will remember that eggs have big ends and little ends, but Kepler did use<br />

ellipses as calculating devices, and eventually came with a start to a realization<br />

that the orbit itself was an ellipse, with the Sun at one focus (the ‘first law’).<br />

O, how ridiculous <strong>of</strong> me! As if the libration in the diameter could not be a<br />

way to the ellipse. I have become thoroughly convinced that the ellipse<br />

stands together with the libration, as will be evident in the next chapter,<br />

where at the same time it will be demonstrated that no figure remains for<br />

the orbit <strong>of</strong> the planet other than a perfectly elliptical one. 24<br />

Kepler’s first two laws (which were soon generalized to the other planets) were<br />

published, with a detailed account <strong>of</strong> his procedures, in 1609 in his Astronomia

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!