27.10.2014 Views

Routledge History of Philosophy Volume IV

Routledge History of Philosophy Volume IV

Routledge History of Philosophy Volume IV

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

398 GLOSSARY<br />

induction, eliminative:<br />

induction by simple<br />

enumeration:<br />

induction, summative:<br />

instrumentalism:<br />

intelligences, planetary:<br />

Jansenism:<br />

knowledge, theory <strong>of</strong>:<br />

—unobserved as well as observed—have this<br />

property. Contrast ‘induction, summative’.<br />

in this, one is looking for what Bacon (Novum<br />

Organum, I, 105) called ‘the contradictory instance’.<br />

That is, one is looking for a member <strong>of</strong> the class C<br />

which does not have the property f.<br />

here (in contrast with eliminative induction) one tries<br />

to establish the truth <strong>of</strong> the proposition that all<br />

members <strong>of</strong> the class C have the property f by looking<br />

for cases in which members <strong>of</strong> this class have the<br />

property f. Notoriously, this procedure is liable to be<br />

upset by the discovery <strong>of</strong> a contradictory instance.<br />

unlike ampliative induction (q.v.), this form <strong>of</strong><br />

induction merely summarizes the evidence. An<br />

example would be: ‘Mary is tall, and Joan is tall, and<br />

Sally is tall; Mary, Joan and Sally are all the women<br />

in this room; therefore all the women in this room are<br />

tall.’<br />

in the philosophy <strong>of</strong> science, the view that scientific<br />

theories are not descriptions <strong>of</strong> the real world but are<br />

simply devices which enable scientists to make<br />

successful predictions on the basis <strong>of</strong> the data they<br />

have.<br />

in Aristotle’s astronomical theory, the movements <strong>of</strong><br />

the Sun, Moon, planets and stars involve the rotation<br />

<strong>of</strong> spheres to which they are fixed. Medieval<br />

philosophers asserted that each <strong>of</strong> these spheres is<br />

governed by an ‘intelligence’.<br />

a system based on the writings <strong>of</strong> the Dutch<br />

theologian Cornelius Otto Jansen (1585–1638).<br />

Jansenism is a deterministic system (see<br />

‘determinism’), denying human freedom. The<br />

reasons for this denial are distinctive, in that they are<br />

based on a view about the grace <strong>of</strong> God—that is, about<br />

the assistance that God gives to human beings, with a<br />

view to their salvation. The Jansenists argued that,<br />

without the grace <strong>of</strong> God, human beings could not<br />

obey his commandments, and that this grace was not<br />

something that they could freely accept or reject but<br />

was irresistible. Probably the most famous followers<br />

<strong>of</strong> Jansen were the mathematician Blaise Pascal<br />

(1623–62) and the philosopher Antoine Arnauld<br />

(1612–94).<br />

see ‘epistemology’.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!