12.01.2015 Views

Download - Academy Publisher

Download - Academy Publisher

Download - Academy Publisher

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

may lead to long waiting delay for some services.<br />

Furthermore, the division and adjustment of the channel<br />

also depends on the experience of administrators. The<br />

description of static policy rule itself is not enough to<br />

react to the effect on system after different kinds of<br />

services access. In this paper, the autonomic mobile<br />

resource management architecture is established. By<br />

means of the combination of policies and utility<br />

computing, mobile resource utilization rate is raised,<br />

making the system utility and user QoE to be maximized<br />

and guaranteeing QoS with a variety of real-time and non<br />

real-time services. Simulation result shows that the policybased<br />

autonomic mobile network resource management<br />

architecture has obvious advantages and flexibility.<br />

Figure 7. Handoff Dropping Rate of Three Wireless Resource<br />

Allocation Methods<br />

Figure 8 shows the bandwidth occupancy of four kinds<br />

of mobile user services: VoIP, IPTV, Net games, and FTP<br />

download service, with time varying under the PBMRAM<br />

framework.<br />

VI. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT<br />

The authors thank for the discussions and suggestions<br />

from the fellows in their laboratory. This work is<br />

supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of<br />

China (grant no. 60973136) and the International<br />

Cooperation and Exchange Project (China-Canadian<br />

innovation and commercial development strategies)<br />

Special Project (grant no. 2008DFA12140) of the<br />

Ministry of Science and technology of China.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Figure 8. Bandwidth Occupancy of Four Kinds of Mobile User Services<br />

We can see that in the initial case, the system load is<br />

small and all service requirements can be met. When the<br />

system is close to full load, if there are a variety of new<br />

services continuing to request accessing to the system, and<br />

the conversational class (Spref = 0.4) and the interactive<br />

class (Spref = 0.3) which have greater impact than other<br />

on the overall utility can continue to access, while the<br />

bandwidth of stream class service and background class<br />

service will be squeezed to reduce the bandwidth<br />

occupancy under the guidance of policy. The system will<br />

keep fully loaded, and background class service will not<br />

occupy the bandwidth continuously under the guidance of<br />

the policy until a large number of conversational services<br />

end or leave the cell.<br />

V. CONCLUSION<br />

The resources allocation of the wireless access<br />

network are achieved usually by dividing channel and<br />

adjusting threshold, and with the disadvantage that<br />

reserving fixed channel may result in the decline of the<br />

wireless network resource utilization rate, and<br />

distinguishing services by priority then queuing to access<br />

[1] Huang, Y.-R., Lin, Y.-B., & Ho, J. M. Performance<br />

analysis for voice/data integration on a finite mobile<br />

systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology,<br />

49, 367–378. March, 2000.<br />

[2] Lai, F. S., Misic, J., & Chanson, S. T. Complete sharing<br />

versus partitioning: quality of service management for<br />

wireless multimedia networks[C]. In Proceedings of the<br />

7th International Conference on Computer<br />

Communications & Networks, pp. 584–593. October, 1998.<br />

[3] Mariana Dirani, Tijani Chahed: Framework for Resource<br />

Allocation in Heterogeneous Wireless Networks Using<br />

Game Theory[C]. EuroNGI Workshop 2006: 144-154 .<br />

[4] Takayuki Osogami, Mor Harchol-Balter, and Alan<br />

Scheller-Wolf, "Robustness and performance of thresholdbased<br />

resource allocation policies," Technical Report<br />

CMU-CS-04-112, 2004.<br />

[5] Horn P. Autonomic computing: IBM’s perspective on the<br />

state of information technology. IBM Corporation, 2001.<br />

[6] Kephart JO, Chess DM. The vision of autonomic<br />

computing. IEEE Computer, 2003,36(1):41-50.<br />

[7] A Westerinen, et al. “Terminology for Policy baesd<br />

Management”. IETF RFC 3198, November 2001.<br />

[8] David Soldani, Man Li, Renaud Cuny. QoS and QoE<br />

Management in UMTS Cellular Systems[M]. Wiley,<br />

August, 2006.<br />

[9] Shi Lei, Changbin Liu, and Bin Liu. Network utility<br />

maximization for triple-play services[C], Computer<br />

Communications, Volume 3, Issue 10 , 2008: 2257-2269.<br />

[10] Liu Xue-jie, Liu Yan-heng, Wei Da, Wen Zhe. Research<br />

on generation mechanism to dynamic policy of resources<br />

allocation for mobile IP handoff[J], Journal on<br />

Communications,2006,27(10): 108-115.<br />

148

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!