Download - Academy Publisher
Download - Academy Publisher
Download - Academy Publisher
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
⎡ −<br />
⎢<br />
⎢<br />
( s4,0.02)<br />
GP =<br />
⎢(<br />
s1,0.42)<br />
⎢<br />
⎣(<br />
s3,0.35)<br />
( s , −0.02)<br />
4<br />
−<br />
( s ,0.19)<br />
3<br />
( s ,0.03)<br />
4<br />
( s , −0.42)<br />
7<br />
( s , −0.19)<br />
5<br />
−<br />
( s ,0.17)<br />
5<br />
( s5,<br />
−0.35)<br />
⎤<br />
( s −<br />
⎥<br />
4,<br />
0.03)<br />
⎥<br />
( s , −0.17)<br />
⎥<br />
3<br />
⎥<br />
− ⎦<br />
Using RMM(Row Mean Method), the integrated<br />
assessment on each indicator was calculated and the<br />
comprehensive value of the organization capability,<br />
customer relation management, quality of employee, the<br />
sustainability<br />
was<br />
s ,0.07),( s ,0.25),( s ,0.48),( ,0.18) .<br />
(<br />
5 4<br />
2<br />
s4<br />
Ⅵ.. CONCLUSION<br />
A new method was used to designate the weight of<br />
each element for each expert under group decisionmaking<br />
based on linguistic 2-tuple representation. The<br />
basic idea for calculating the weight is that the<br />
consistency of each element is not the same, thus the<br />
decision power of the decision-maker should not be given<br />
the same priority. The method was used in building the<br />
non-financial performance system for listed company in<br />
Chinese SME board.<br />
ACKNOWLEDGMENT<br />
This work is supported in part by Jiaxing College<br />
Education Research Foundation Grant by 85150932 and<br />
Economic Commence Market Application Technology<br />
Foundation Grant by 2007gdecof004.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
[1] .D Ben-Arieh, .Z Chen, “Linguisitc group decisionmaking:opinion<br />
aggregation and measures of consenus”,<br />
Fuzzy Optim Decis Making,2006,5:371-386<br />
[2] Chen Z F, “Consensus in group decision making under<br />
linguistic assessment”, Manhattan Kansas, Kansas State<br />
University, 2005<br />
[3] Lei Yang, “Group decision making theory and<br />
itsapplication—research on aggregating personal<br />
preferences into group decision”, Beijing:Economic<br />
Science <strong>Publisher</strong>,2004,pp.67-80<br />
[4] F. Ye, Z.J Hong, “ Congregating of the experts' weights for<br />
group decision-making problem with incomplete<br />
information”, Communication On Applied Mathematics<br />
and Computation, Vol2020,pp.63-67, Jan2006<br />
[5] C.H Yu , Z.P Fan, “Maximal tree clustering method based<br />
on dyadic semantic information processing”, Systems<br />
Engineering and Electronics, Vol28, pp.1519-1522,<br />
October 2006<br />
[6] Fedrizzi, “Consensus reaching via a GDSS with fuzzy<br />
majority and clustering of preference profiles”, Annals of<br />
Operations Research, Vol.51,pp. 127-139, Septermber<br />
1994<br />
[7] Y.F Zhou, F.J Wei, “The Method for Determining the<br />
Posterior Weight of Expert Based on Fuzzy Judgment<br />
Matrices”, Chinese Journal of Management Science,<br />
Vol.14, pp.71-75, March 2006<br />
[8] E Herrera-Viedma,F Chiclana, F Herrera , S Alonso,<br />
“Group decision-making model with incomplete fuzzy<br />
preference relations based on additive consistency”, IEEE<br />
Transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics-part B:<br />
cybernetics, Vol.37, pp. 176-189, Jan<br />
[9] F.Herrera , L.Martinez, “The 2-tuple linguistic<br />
computational model—advantages of its linguistic<br />
description, accuracy and consistency”, International<br />
Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based<br />
Systems, Vol.9, pp. 33-48, September 2003<br />
[10] Z.W Gong, S.F Liu, “Linguisitc 2-tuple group decision<br />
making method based on different preferences judgment<br />
matrices”, System enginerring, Vol.22, pp. 185-189,<br />
March 2007<br />
[11] X.W Liao, H Li, G.M.Dong., “A Multi-attribute Group<br />
Decision-making Approach Dealing with Linguistic<br />
Assessment Information,” Theory and Practice of System<br />
Engineering, Vol.9, pp.90-98, September 2006<br />
72