12.01.2015 Views

Download - Academy Publisher

Download - Academy Publisher

Download - Academy Publisher

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Fig 4. Content and context awareness protocol ontology<br />

To understand each other correctly, accurate information<br />

semantic transportation is the first part. The core<br />

ontology of KC 2 A 2 P defines three concepts of content,<br />

context, act, which not only support the semantic<br />

interconnection between different protocols, but also<br />

offer framework for the protocol information formation.<br />

(Fig4)<br />

V. ONTOLOGY-BASED AWARENESS COMPUTING<br />

Based on KC 2 A 2 P ontology, senders can decide what<br />

it need to encode and receiver can know what the truth<br />

meaning of transferred message is and what is related the<br />

requirement.<br />

Ontology-based semantic relatedness computing is<br />

important for realizing this mutual awareness. Semantic<br />

relatedness is a general concept that could include<br />

semantic similarity computing. And it is more useful<br />

than just semantic similarity computing. Because similar<br />

entities are always semantically related by virtue of their<br />

similarity (female-woman), but dissimilar entities may<br />

also be semantically related by lexical relationships such<br />

as meronymy (car–wheel) and antonymy (hot–cold), or<br />

just by any kind of functional relationship or frequent<br />

association (pencil–paper, penguin–Antarctica, rain–<br />

flood). Computational applications typically require<br />

relatedness rather than just similarity; for example, when<br />

asking for traveling information, some resource about<br />

hotel and weather is also required. SRC (Algorithm of<br />

Semantic Relatedness of Concepts) [13] is a semantic<br />

relativity algorithm ,which just bases on ontology and<br />

does not need any former knowledge. It has three main<br />

steps : reading OWL files and building proper graph;<br />

according to its subsume axioms producing sub<br />

graph( that is a tree structure) consisting only<br />

subsumption relationship and counting the semantic<br />

relatedness by myObjectMatching method; according to<br />

the relation path functions ,calculating the whole classes<br />

semantic similarity based on the graph filling with six<br />

kinds of relations. Some formulas are:<br />

Sem _ Re lated [ C ][ C ] is the semantic<br />

1 2<br />

relativity value of C and C<br />

1 2<br />

Sem _ Weight [ C ][ C ] is the direct<br />

2 3<br />

semantic weight of C and C<br />

2 3<br />

Sem _ Road [ C ][ C ] =<br />

1 3<br />

Sem _ Re lated [ C ][ C ] × Sem _ Weight [ C ] [ C ] (1)<br />

1 2<br />

2 3<br />

Sem _ Re lated [ C ][ C ] = max<br />

⎛<br />

_ [ ][ ][ ]<br />

⎞<br />

⎜ Sem Road S C C ⎟ (2)<br />

1 3 ⎝<br />

1 3<br />

s<br />

⎠<br />

VI. EXPERIMENT<br />

We take Education Information Platform as<br />

experiment background, Eclipse+JADE (Java Agent<br />

Development framework) as exploitation tool, research<br />

on the awareness-based knowledge communication<br />

process. One client inquires a book named Semantic<br />

Web. There are four different providers. Provider1 holds<br />

one book on Ontology, provider2 holds Semantic Web<br />

Journal and provider3 hasn’t any resource about<br />

Semantic Web. When the buyer sends a request for<br />

looking for a book on Semantic Web, provider3 refuses<br />

the request because it doesnot have this resource.<br />

Provider1 and provider2 analyze the request by content<br />

awareness algorithm and send decision to the client.<br />

Client analyses these replies and chooses propose which<br />

is close to its own request. The interaction process of this<br />

example is illustrated by Figure 5.<br />

180

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!