12.01.2015 Views

Download - Academy Publisher

Download - Academy Publisher

Download - Academy Publisher

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

elated weighted vector with ∑<br />

n<br />

i=<br />

1<br />

ω = 1<br />

weighted average operator of linguistic 2-tuples<br />

ξ ω<br />

= ∇(<br />

(( s , α ),( s<br />

1<br />

n<br />

∑<br />

i=<br />

1<br />

1<br />

∇<br />

−1<br />

2<br />

, α ), L,(<br />

s<br />

2<br />

( s , α ) ω )<br />

i<br />

C. WEIGHT OF EVALUATION INDICATORS<br />

i<br />

i<br />

n<br />

i<br />

, α )) = (ˆ, s ˆ) α<br />

n<br />

, then the<br />

ω<br />

ξ is[15]<br />

(6)<br />

The questionnaires were analyzed using linguistic 2-<br />

tuple representation model. And the weight of each<br />

indicator was obtained. The weight of each sub-indicator<br />

was also analyzed. Thus, evaluation system for blended<br />

learning and its weights of each indicator and its subindicator<br />

could be demonstrated as table 1.<br />

indicators<br />

(weight)<br />

Quality of<br />

BB<br />

resource<br />

(0.35)<br />

Mutual<br />

exchange<br />

quality of<br />

BB<br />

(0.37)<br />

Quality of<br />

blended<br />

discussion<br />

(0.28)<br />

Table 1 evaluation system and its weight<br />

Sub-indicators (weight)<br />

Abundance of resources in BB (0.37)<br />

Relativity of resource provided in BB (0.34)<br />

Distribution reasonability of resources in<br />

BB (0.29)<br />

Punctuality of teacher’s answer(0.33)<br />

Accuracy of teacher’s answer(0.38)<br />

Energetic discussion inspired by<br />

teachers(0.29)<br />

The abundance of the materials and its<br />

relationship to the topic(0.22)<br />

The logic of the team representation report<br />

(0.20)<br />

Frequency of the team discussion(0.14)<br />

The accuracy and depth of the problem<br />

solving.(0.19)<br />

Question posted and frequency of answers<br />

(0.09)<br />

Attitude of the group team(0.16)<br />

Ⅴ. CONCLUSION<br />

The paper introduced the architecture of blended<br />

learning system. It got the indicators to evaluation the<br />

blended learning. Then it used linguistic 2-tuple<br />

representation model to handle fuzzy term in<br />

questionnaire and obtained the weight of each indicators<br />

and its sub-indictors. The education management<br />

department can use the evaluation system proposed in the<br />

paper to assess the network resource in BB.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGMENT<br />

This work is supported by Education Planning<br />

Research foundation of Zhejiang Province Grant by<br />

scg85. It is also supported by Jiaxing University<br />

Education Research Foundation Grant by 85150932 and<br />

Economic Commence Market Application Technology<br />

Foundation Grant by 2007gdecof004.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[1] Prahalad. Case study: University of Michigan Business<br />

School Using PRAJA. Technology to Enhance<br />

Learning,2002.<br />

[2] K.K.He, “E-Learning and the revolution of<br />

university/college“ ,http://www.edu.Cn /<br />

20011225/3015160. shtml”, 05-10-2009<br />

[3] K.D. Li, J.H.Zhao, “Theory and its application of blended<br />

learning”, Electrical education research, Vol.4, pp.78-81,<br />

July 2004<br />

[4] M.Driscoll·, “Blended learning : Let’s get beyond the<br />

hype”, Learning and Training Innovations[R],2002.<br />

[5] H.Singh, C.Reed, “Achieving Success with Blended<br />

Learning”, http://www.centra.com/downloa whitepapers/<br />

blended learning. Pdf, 30-01-2002.<br />

[6] D.Clark(2003), “Whitepaper: Blended Learning”,<br />

http://www.epic.co.uk/content/resources/white_papers/blen<br />

ded. Htm, 21-05-2005<br />

[7] W.L.Chen andC.K.Looi, “Incorporating online discussion<br />

in face to face classroom learning: A new blended learning<br />

approach”, Australasian Journal of Educational<br />

Technology, Vol.23, pp. 307-326, March 2007:.<br />

[8] N.H.Yuan, “Blended instructional schema based on virtual<br />

technology”, Journal of Guangdong technology normal<br />

college,Vol.5, pp. 135-137, May 2006<br />

[9] W.S. Pan, “Research on blended instructionalschema based<br />

on network resource”, Electrical education research, Vol. 8,<br />

pp. 49-51, August 2006.8<br />

[10] X.Li, “Exploring effective learning schema based on<br />

blended learning and self-studying”, Modern education<br />

techniques, Vol.4, pp.32-35, April 2007<br />

[11] Y.P.Jiang, Y.N.Xing,“Consistency Analysis of Two-Tuple<br />

Linguistic Judgement Matrix,” Journal of Northeastern<br />

University(Natural Science), Vol.28, pp.129-132, January<br />

2007<br />

[12] Z.S.Xu, ” A Multi-attribute group decision making method<br />

based on fuzzy linguistic evaluationa and GIOWA<br />

operator”, J.Sys.Sci.& Math. Sci., Vol.24, pp.:218-224,<br />

April 2004 (in Chinese).<br />

[13] F. Herrera, L.Martinez. A model based on linguistic 2-<br />

tuples for dealing with multigranular hierarchical linguistic<br />

contexts in multi-expert decision making. IEEE<br />

Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-part b:<br />

Cybernetics, Vol.31, pp. 227-234, April 2001<br />

[14] F.Herrera , L.Martinez, “The 2-tuple linguistic<br />

computational model—advantages of its linguistic<br />

description, accuracy and consistency”, International<br />

Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based<br />

Systems, Vol.9, pp. 33-48, September 2003<br />

[15] X.W.Liao, H.Li,G.M.Dong., “A Multi-attribute Group<br />

Decision-making Approach Dealing with Linguistic<br />

Assessment Information,” Theory and Practice of System<br />

Engineering, Vol.9, pp.90-98, September 2006 (in Chinese)<br />

84

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!