2TUESDAY 2 SEPTEMBER 20141715-1730 9F6 Common practice situations can become triggers for teaching in the CanMEDS Intrinsic RolesDeepak Dath*, McMaster University, Surgery, Hamilton, Canada; Nicholas Afagh, McMaster University, Surgery, Hamilton,Canada; Stephen Kelly, McMaster University, Surgery, Hamilton, Canada; Michael Marcaccio, McMaster University, Surgery,Hamilton, Canada; Brad Petrisor, McMaster Univerity, Surgery, Hamilton, CanadaNo discussion1600-1730 9G SHORT COMMUNICATIONS: Written AssessmentChairperson:Location: Theatre Room 12, Level 0, MiCo1600-1615 9G1 Changing assessment practice: Making quality visible as an impetus to changeFrancois Cilliers*, University of Cape Town, Education Development Unit, Cape Town, South Africa1615-1630 9G2 Determining required test timeHerman E. Popeijus*, Maastricht University, Educational Development & Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and LifeSciences, Maastricht, Netherlands; Joost Dijkstra, Maastricht University, Educational Development & Research, Faculty ofHealth, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht, Netherlands1630-1645 9G3 Review of items with low difficulty index in the Swiss federal licencing examination (FLE) ofhuman medicine: Why tough items are toughBernard Cerutti*, Faculty of Medicine, UDREM, Geneva, Switzerland; Elisabeth Van Gessel, Faculty of Medicine, InterprofessionalSimulation Centre, Geneva, Switzerland; Nu Vu, Faculty of Medicine, UDREM, Geneva, Switzerland1645-1700 9G4 How to use item analysis to improve teaching, learning and assessment in medical schoolSiew Kim Kwa*, International Medical University Malaysia, Family Medicine, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; Chin Hoong Wong,International Medical University Malaysia, Family Medicine, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; Sharmini Gangadaran, InternationalMedical University Malaysia, Academic Services, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; Siang Tong Kew, International Medical UniversityMalaysia, Dean Medical School, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia1700-1715 9G5 The case for retiring the open-ended format in written summative assessment in clinicalmedicineRichard J Hift*, University of KwaZulu-Natal, School of Clinical Medicine, Durban, South Africa1715-1730 9G6 National Electronic Assessment is possible, affordable and validMichael Begg*, University of Edinburgh, Learning Technology Section, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Matt Hammond,University of Edinburgh, Learning Technology Section, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Simon Maxwell, University ofEdinburgh, Clinical Pharmacology, Edinburgh, United KingdomNo discussion1600-1730 9H SHORT COMMUNICATIONS: Feedback 2Chairperson: Ming-Ka Chan (Canada)Location: Amber 1, Level +2, MiCo1600-1615 9H1 The effect of reflection and assessor feedback on the confidence of medical students to performan endotracheal intubationIna Treadwell*, University of Limpopo (Medunsa Campus), Skills Centre, Pretoria, South Africa1615-1630 9H2 The value of adding students’ self-assessment to online faculty feedback on their perception ofthe usefulness of this feedbackAnn Deketelaere, Catholic University of Leuven, Unit Teaching and Learning Support, Faculty of Medicine, Leuven, Belgium;Annick Dermine, Catholic University of Leuevn, Unit Teaching and Learning Support, Faculty of Medicine, Leuven, Belgium;Katrien Bosselaers, Catholic University of Leuven, Unit Teaching and Learning Support, Faculty of Medicine, Leuven,Belgium; Bernard Himpens, Catholic University of Leuven, Faculty of Medicine, Leuven, Belgium; Isabel Gheysen*, CatholicUniversityof Leuven, Unit Teaching and Learning Support, Faculty of Medicine, Leuven, Belgium1630-1645 9H3 Practice does not always make perfect: Negative thoughts degrade performance in novicemedical trainees learning suturing techniquesKinga L. Eliasz*, McMaster University; University of Toronto; The Hospital for Sick Children, Kinesiology; The Wilson Centre;The Learning Institute, Toronto, Canada; Aaron D.C. Knox, University of British Columbia; University of Toronto; TheHospital for Sick Children, Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery; The Wilson Centre; The Learning Institute, Toronto,Canada; Faizal A. Haji, University of Western Ontario; University of Toronto; The Hospital for Sick Children, Division ofNeurosurgery; The Wilson Centre; The Learning Institute, Toronto, Canada; Adam Dubrowski, Memorial University ofNewfoundland, Disciplines of Emergency Medicine and Pediatrics, St. John’s, Canada, David Rojas, University of Toronto;The Hospital for Sick Children, The Wilson Centre; The Learning Institute, Toronto, Canada; James Lyons, McMasterUniversity, Kinesiology, Hamilton, Canada1645-1700 9H4 Thematic analysis of clinical teachers’ experiences of feedback: What factors make it easier, ormore difficult, to give feedback?Janet Riddle*, University of Illinois Chicago College of Medicine, Medical Education, Chicago, United States; Angela Blood,Rush University Medical College, Medical Education, Chicago, United States– 161 –
1700-1715 9H5 Development of a verbal feedback quality assessment instrument for health professionals in theworkplaceChristina E. Johnson*, Monash University, HealthPEER, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Science, Melbourne,Australia; Jennifer L. Keating, Monash University, Allied Health, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Science,Melbourne, Australia; Elizabeth K. Molloy, Monash University, HealthPEER, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and HealthScience, Melbourne, Australia1715-1730 9H6 Researching feedback dialogue using interactional analysisRola Ajjawi*, University of Dundee, Centre for Medical Education, Dundee, United Kingdom; Karen Barton, University ofDundee, Centre for Medical Education, Dundee, United Kingdom; David Boud, University of Technology Sydney, Centre forMedical Education, Sydney, AustraliaNo discussion1600-1730 9I SHORT COMMUNICATIONS: Staff / Faculty Development 2Chairperson: Volkhard Fischer (Germany)Opening Discussant: Lisa MacInnes (United Kingdom)Location:Amber 2, Level +2, MiCo1600-1615 9I1 A masters’ programme in medical education as a strategy for implementing scholarship ofteaching and learningCharlotte Silén*, Karolinska Institutet, Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Stockholm, Sweden; Klara BolanderLaksov, Karolinska Institutet, Learning, Informatics, Management and Etihics, Stockholm, Sweden; Lena Engqvist Boman,Karolinska Institutet, Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Stockholm, Sweden; Janet Mattsson, KarolinskaInstitutet, Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Stockholm, Sweden1615-1630 9I2 The Centre of Medical Education at the University of Genoa, Italy: Activities and impactAntonella Lotti*, University of Genova, Genova, Italy1630-1645 9I3 A Teaching Logbook for the Development of Doctors as Medical EducatorsXinyi Du*, North East Thames Foundation School, London, United Kingdom; Muhammad Kebreya, North East ThamesFoundation School, London, United Kingdom; Sreekanth Sakthibalan, North East Thames Foundation School, London,United Kingdom; Frances Hiscock, North East Thames Foundation School, London, United Kingdom1645-1700 9I4 Factors which augment or hamper medical teachers’ ‘Transfer of Learning’ of teaching skill atworkplaceRahila Yasmeen*, Riphah International University, Riphah Academy of Research and Education, Islamabad, Pakistan; AlbertScherpbier, Maastricht University, School of Health Professions Education, Maastricht, Netherlands; Willem De Grave,Maastricht University, School of Health Professions Education, Maastricht, Netherlands; Reids A Bates, Louisiana StateUniversity, School of Human Resource Education & Workforce Development, Louisiana, United States1700-1715 9I5 The motivational factors for participation in the course “Art of medical education”: A qualitativestudyMladenka Vrcic Keglevic*, Croatian Association for Medical Education, Zagreb, Croatia; Martina Lovric-Bencic, CroatianAssociation for Medical Education, Zagreb, Croatia; Tomo Luetic, Croatian Association for Medical Education, Zagreb,Croatia; Darko Anticevic, Croatian Association for Medical Education, Zagreb, Croatia1715-1730 Discussion1600-1730 9J SHORT COMMUNICATIONS: Communication SkillsChairperson: Benjamin Blatt (United States)Opening Discussant: Subha Ramani (United States)Location:Amber 3, Level +2, MiCo1600-1615 9J1 Learning authentic Clinical Communication: An educational initiative based in the clinicalworkplaceJo Brown*, St George’s, University of London, Centre for Medical and Healthcare Education, London, United Kingdom;Jo Dearnaley, St George’s, University of London, Centre for Medical and Healthcare Education, London, United Kingdom;Karen Lobb-Rosinni, St George’s, University of London, Centre for Medical and Healthcare Education, London, UnitedKingdom1615-1630 9J2 Empathy, Self-Disclosure, and Boundary Turbulence with Advanced Cancer PatientsSusan H McDaniel*, University of Rochester, Psychiatry & Family Medicine, Rochester, New York, United States; ShmuelReis, Bar Ilan University Faculty of Medicine in the Galillee, Faculty Development, Safed, Israel; Diane S Morse, Universityof Rochester, Psychiatry and Medicine, Rochester, New York, United States; Elizabeth A. Edwardsen, University ofRochester, Emergency Medicine, Rochester, New York, United States; Cleveland G. Shields, Purdue University, Marriage& Family Therapy, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States; Jennifer J. Griggs, University of Michigan, Internal Medicine,Hematology & Oncology, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States– 162 –