18.12.2012 Views

Proceedings

Proceedings

Proceedings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The determination rapport (R-squared) has a small value, almost 26.54% of the<br />

variance of EPI and is explained by the variance of the GDP per capita factor.<br />

Statistical relationship between the endogenous variable and exogenous variable is<br />

weak, which shows that besides the GDPC variable, used to test a causal relationship<br />

between the EPI and GDPC, we also include other variables as the composition of this<br />

indicator includes a number of 25 other influential factors.<br />

The validity of this model can be sustained on the account of low values of probability<br />

and standard error values. The probabilities associated with the t-Student test for<br />

independent variable coefficient is below 5% (0%), thus rejecting the null hypothesis<br />

that the slope of the regression line is insignificantly different from zero, thus<br />

obtaining a properly specified model. Similar results for free term (free term is<br />

significantly different from zero). Between the value of t and F statistics, which<br />

corresponds to the regression slope, we can verify the relationship t ² = F. Durbin-<br />

Watson test, with a value of 2.10, indicating that the residual variables are not auto<br />

related.<br />

Forecast<br />

In order to make a forecast of the EPI variable we have resized the data series by<br />

using a sample of observations from 1 to 120, and starting with the observation 121,<br />

we considered the prediction (Figure 6). The forecast is accurate enough because<br />

RMSE is low (11.33) taking into account that the sample taken into consideration is<br />

quite high, and the Theil coefficient is less than 1 (0.078).<br />

130<br />

120<br />

110<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

Figure 6. Forecast for EPI variable based on current values<br />

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120<br />

PREVIZIUNI_EPI ± 2 S.E.<br />

~ 1085 ~<br />

Forecast: PREVIZIUNI_EPI<br />

Actual: EPI<br />

Forecast sample: 1 120<br />

Included observations: 120<br />

Root Mean Squared Error 11.33958<br />

Mean Absolute Error 9.242842<br />

Mean Abs. Percent Error 14.55307<br />

Theil Inequality Coefficient 0.078198<br />

Bias Proportion 0.000001<br />

Variance Proportion 0.333530<br />

Covariance Proportion 0.666469<br />

Economic Interpretation<br />

The regression model results obtained by using the application EViews, showed that<br />

GDP per capita influences to a large extent the EPI indicator. By analyzing the<br />

determination ratio (R-squared = 26.54%) we can observe that its amount is quite high<br />

considering the fact that 25 variables are included into the composition of EPI. Given<br />

that developed countries have a very high GDP per capita, an increase of $ 1,000<br />

means (by refering to our average) an increase of the EPI Score by 0.329.<br />

Extensions of the above- used regression model Environmental Performance Index is<br />

a variable depending not only on the classical indicators such as GDP per capita, as

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!