18.12.2012 Views

Proceedings

Proceedings

Proceedings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Cross-country performance comparative analysis has several faults that must be<br />

highlighted:<br />

� asset allocation between equity and bonds show a wide variation among<br />

different countries;<br />

� different levels of liquidity on capital markets make way for different asset<br />

valuation methods;<br />

� different calculation methods for rate-of-returns (reported returns gross of<br />

management fees or net of management fees);<br />

� Sharpe ratio can be used under the assumption that a riskless rate exist or if<br />

proxies for it are used instead;<br />

� regulatory environment;<br />

� idiosyncratic characteristics of each country pension system.<br />

The conclusion of Antolin’s study [2008] is that Sharpe ratios and Markowitz meanvariance<br />

approach with historical data can be used to compare the pension plan<br />

performance to artificially constructed benchmarks. However, in countries were<br />

private plans have recently been implemented the historical data on which the study<br />

might be based is scarce. Antolin [2008] suggests that progress should be done in data<br />

collection as to enhance the development of international standards for the reporting<br />

of pension fund performance that could support more in depth performance<br />

evaluation.<br />

5. RESULTS<br />

At the present moment Romania uses short-term returns to measure performance for<br />

pension funds (24 months periods). As mentioned by Antolin [2010], the high rates of<br />

return exhibited by pension funds in developing countries might be related to high<br />

interest rates in the economy or a country-specific risk premium arising from lack of<br />

development of domestic capital market, making short-term returns not viable as a<br />

pension performance measure.<br />

Another major issue in the Romanian case is that there is no investment option that<br />

can be regarded as a risk-free asset for long-term investors. Treasury bills might be<br />

risk-free from a short-term point of view but on the long run they fail to provide<br />

protection against reinvestment risk. Government bonds provide protection against<br />

reinvestment risk (long-term bonds protect investors from reinvestment risk because<br />

falls in interest rates are compensated with capital gains in the value of the bond) but<br />

cannot manage the inflation risk. Viceira [2010] considers that true riskless assets for<br />

developing countries are long-term inflation-indexed bonds but Walker [2010]<br />

recommends the short-term bonds as an alternative for protection against unexpected<br />

changes in inflation rates.<br />

Private pension participants in Romania suffer from the capital market infancy.<br />

Defined contribution plans imply that participants choose where to invest their<br />

contributions, which exposes them to capital market risk arising from directly holding<br />

the asset.<br />

The strict regulation of the Romanian pension market can affect the overall<br />

performance of a pension fund. Imposing the limits of asset allocation and relying<br />

heavily on local investment assets induce myopia towards currency hedging. Holding<br />

~ 616 ~

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!