18.12.2012 Views

Proceedings

Proceedings

Proceedings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

literally several provisions of the General Framework for the Preparation and<br />

Presentation of Financial Statements drafted by IASC/IASB. We may assume that the<br />

IASC/IASB hierarchy is also used by the Romanian regulation (IASB and FASB are<br />

working on a major project of improving the General framework... In the new version,<br />

the hierarchy of quality characteristics is even more pronounced). Therefore, these<br />

enacting terms are said to rely on basic concepts (accrual accounting and going<br />

concern), as well as on qualitative characteristics and their components (In this<br />

context, it is to emphasize that the use of IAS/IFRS in Romania, during 2000 - 2005,<br />

had some tax consequences in entities bound by the Order of the Minister of Public<br />

Finance 94/2001 on the approval of accounting regulations harmonized with the<br />

Fourth European Economic Community and the International Accounting Standards<br />

(Official Gazette 94/2001). Table 1 shows the regulations that imposed explicit<br />

accounting principles in Romania.<br />

Although it may not be representative, the principle presentation order suggests a<br />

slight approach alteration. Thus, the principle of prudence, which ranks first in the HG<br />

704/1993, seems to lose its importance with the diversification of the inspiration<br />

sources used by the Romanian regulator that also relies on IAS/IFRS (Albu et al.,<br />

2010). After 1999, for some entities (especially public entities), the regulations added<br />

three principles: separate accounting evaluation of assets and liabilities, substance<br />

over form and materiality. Starting with 2010, the nine principles apply to all entities,<br />

regardless of their size or presence on the financial market.<br />

The accounting principle<br />

Table 1. Accounting principles evolution in Romania<br />

HG<br />

704/1993<br />

OMFP<br />

403/1999,<br />

replaced<br />

by OMFP<br />

94/2001<br />

~ 789 ~<br />

OMFP<br />

306/2002<br />

OMFP<br />

1752/2005<br />

OMFP<br />

3055/2009<br />

Effective date 1.01. 1994 1.01. 1999 1.01. 2003 1.01. 2006 ian. 2010<br />

Date up to which has been<br />

applied<br />

31.12. 2002 31.12. 2005 31.12. 2005 31.12. 2009<br />

Going concern 3 1 1 1 1<br />

Comparability 2 2 2 2 2<br />

Conservatism (evaluation on a<br />

prudent basis)<br />

1 3 3 3 3<br />

Accrual basis 4 4 4 4 4<br />

Separate accounting evaluation<br />

of assets and liabilities<br />

- 5 5 5 5<br />

Individual recognition, without<br />

any off-setting<br />

The opening balance sheet for<br />

6 6 6 6 6<br />

each financial year must<br />

correspond to the closing balance<br />

of the preceding financial year<br />

5 7 7 7 7<br />

Substance over form - 8 - 8 8<br />

Materiality - 9 - 9 9<br />

3. GENERAL TAX RULES, IN THEIRE RELATIONSHIPS<br />

WITH ACCOUNTING STANDARDS<br />

The tax code does not bring about completely new rules when it tries to set the<br />

notional amount of profit tax. Conversely, the starting point is the accounting

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!