18.12.2012 Views

Proceedings

Proceedings

Proceedings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

are primarily used for performance measurement is understandable that the<br />

interventions of the regulatory authority distort the management accounting system<br />

and performance measurement process.<br />

Given that the regulatory authority exercises strict control over prices on the<br />

telecommunications market, we believe that managing the costs is an imperative; in<br />

this respect Japanese approach of target costing may be useful, supported by an<br />

efficient activity-based management.<br />

However, regulation should not be viewed as a negative aspect. It can also provide<br />

benefits that can be capitalized. For example, for pricing the interconnection services,<br />

LRIC costing model uses data from separate financial statements and relies on<br />

information regarding operators’ recent performance, thereby enabling the elimination<br />

of costs related to structural and operational inefficiencies, and estimating long-term<br />

evolution of these costs.<br />

(b) which management control tools “escape” from regulation and can be<br />

exploited in order to create value and improve company performance?<br />

Addressing the concept of performance, Alazard and Separi (2003) stated that<br />

"performance requires a holistic view of interdependencies between internal and<br />

external, quantitative and qualitative, techniques and human, physical and financial<br />

management parameters." Trying to measure the value created by the organization<br />

solely on the basis of purely financial indicators can lead to a manipulation of<br />

numbers. These negative effects can be counteracted by supplementing the analysis of<br />

financial indicators with non-financial elements. Service quality is one of these<br />

elements, aiming at appropriate quality management.<br />

Quality is increasingly recognized as a key competitive advantage and it is more and<br />

more placed by enterprises in their global strategic choices. In order to improve<br />

quality, the company must invest in prevention, with beneficial effects in saving other<br />

cost categories. Quality in telecommunications can be appreciated by the customer<br />

through the following features: fastness of service installation, promptitude in<br />

replying to failures requests, signal quality, the time required for purchasing new<br />

services, customer information, payment method, changing contractual terms, price,<br />

service customization, compatibility with other services.<br />

A common view in literature is that a satisfied customer is the best indicator of the<br />

quality of any business. While much of the literature suggests that total quality<br />

management facilitate customer satisfaction, Sharma et al. (2010) believe that this is<br />

not necessarily true in the case of privatized monopolies. However, a solution could<br />

be the implementation of a set of concepts and management tools aimed at involving<br />

all staff in order to achieve continuous performance improvement (Hoque, 2003).<br />

But organizational change often encounters resistance from actors who refuse to adapt<br />

to these change. For example, sudden changes of regulations, of technologies or<br />

customer requirements may cause institutional contradictions / inconsistencies<br />

(Sharma et al., 2010). Such a situation was encountered in Romtelecom, when the<br />

reengineering process started, in conjunction with the redesign of organization<br />

structure and activity-based management implementation.<br />

~ 441 ~

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!