18.12.2012 Views

Proceedings

Proceedings

Proceedings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

statements. The study examines the contents of the entire annual report, which was<br />

filed in the last year of the VFP, not just the financial statement part, as has typically<br />

been empirically investigated in previous work on voluntary disclosure. Thus, the<br />

sample of 51 firms includes all voluntarily filed annual reports of 2008. Following<br />

Gray et al. (1995), the entire annual report is seen as a disclosure package. The focus<br />

on the annual report is not the only way by which companies voluntarily provide<br />

information to investors or other interested parties. For example, conference calls and<br />

analyst meetings can provide relevant information to stock market participants<br />

(Debreceny et al. 2002; Healy and Palepu 2001; Frankel et al. 1999). Nevertheless,<br />

the annual report is the most widely disseminated source of information on publicly<br />

and privately held firms (Arnold et al. 1984; Chang et al. 1983; Gray et al. 1995). The<br />

extent of voluntary disclosure is measured by a disclosure index with 54 items.<br />

Moreover, I examine voluntary disclosures by type of information, namely financial,<br />

non-financial, and general information. This procedure is supported by the<br />

expectation that there may be differences in the disclosure behavior of firms<br />

depending on the type of information (Gray et al. 1995). As in recent studies, this<br />

paper considers the hypothesis that certain firm-specific variables may explain the<br />

observed variation in voluntary disclosure. Following Lang and Lundholm (1993),<br />

independent variables were categorized in structure-related variables, performancerelated<br />

variables, and market-related variables.<br />

The study provides several interesting findings. The findings show that voluntary<br />

filers predominantly provide financial tagged information to financial statements<br />

users. However, contrary to earlier research (e.g., Boritz and No 2008), the results<br />

indicate that due to more experience in XBRL filings, firms included notes and<br />

Management Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) in their filings. Thus, the development<br />

of XBRL taxonomies for narrative parts of the annual report is becoming increasingly<br />

important. The results show that firm size and the level of innovativeness of the firm,<br />

measured by the ratio R&D expenditures to sales, to be significantly and positively<br />

related to the extent of voluntary disclosure. Both variables also seem important in<br />

explaining the sub-category financial information disclosures.<br />

The potential contributions of this current study are several. First, examining the<br />

voluntary disclosures of U.S. listed companies should be useful worldwide for<br />

companies that are thinking about adopting XBRL. These companies have a likely<br />

interest in knowing how other firms have followed the complex cost-benefit trade-offs<br />

associated with voluntary disclosures in XBRL format. In addition, voluntary<br />

disclosures often foreshadow trends in worldwide financial reporting and research on<br />

voluntary disclosure will represent an addition to knowledge. Second, the acceptance<br />

and implementation of XBRL around the world has considerably grown during the<br />

last few years. For example, in Europe, a wide range of European countries have<br />

admitted the voluntary submission of financial statements in XBRL format. Still,<br />

several other countries in Europe, such as Lithuania, Czech Republic, and Slovenia, as<br />

well as large parts of Africa and Asia, have not yet dealt with the implementation of<br />

XBRL business reporting at all. Consequently, the results of this study might be<br />

relevant for governments that consider regulating XBRL business reporting for listed<br />

and not listed firms and developing XBRL taxonomies at the national level. However,<br />

only national taxonomies are not able to correspond to the increasing demand for<br />

standardization and comparability on capital markets (Wagenhofer 2003). Therefore,<br />

~ 734 ~

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!