18.12.2012 Views

Proceedings

Proceedings

Proceedings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 4. Transforming process: UML model. Ontology in RDFS<br />

(Source: According to Faucher et al., 2008))<br />

Tabel 1<br />

UML RDF(S),OWL<br />

Class owl :Class<br />

Generalization rdfs :subclassOf<br />

Association owl :ObjectProperty<br />

Attributes owl :DatatypeProperty<br />

InstanceOf rdf :type<br />

Multiplicity owl :minCardinality, owl :maxCardinality<br />

By annotations, all the interesting elements of the model are selected. The annotation<br />

mechanism uses the intrinsic possibilities of UML extension, such as: profiles,<br />

stereotypes, and labeled values. Then, the annotations are exploited while the<br />

ontology is built up, in order to guide the process of model transformation. The<br />

annotated UML model represents an extension of the UML model, which is orientated<br />

on a precise activity field. The pivot model, actually an UML model of ontology,<br />

contains the information required for building up the ontology, in accordance with the<br />

UML meta-model. The second change is based on the connections between the UML<br />

elements and an ontology structure, like RDFS or OWL.<br />

Elements of training ontology<br />

The training ontology describes the specific concepts of the training process, such as:<br />

type of actors involved in the training process, type of pedagogical activities, type of<br />

documents etc. According to Benayache (2005), the training field performs with<br />

specific training concepts:<br />

• Actors of the training process (teacher, student, secretary, administrator,<br />

technician etc.);<br />

• Documents (reading notes, slides, books, Web pages, Web sites and so on);<br />

• Educational resources (digital resources, teaching aids etc.).<br />

All these concepts and relationships constitute the training ontology. The standard<br />

structure of the training ontology, according to Abel et al. (2004), is presented in<br />

Figure 5.<br />

~ 504 ~

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!