18.12.2012 Views

Proceedings

Proceedings

Proceedings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ontology, with the purpose of ensuring the semantic-based access on e-learning<br />

training programs. The MOF’s pedagogical resources are provided for all e-learning<br />

trainers by the local warehouse, also-called Learning Object Repositories (LORs). In<br />

essence, an e-learning system which has the MOF support should allow the trainers to<br />

formulate several informational requests in order to find out the particular OP.<br />

2.2. Pegagogical objects<br />

For e-learning training programs, a so-called Learning Object Repository (LOR) is<br />

set up, where all pedagogical objects are stored and indexed (OP). Our scientific paper<br />

is mainly focused on the representation of pedagogical objects related to the content<br />

of the training field, which is often identified with the pedagogical resources of the<br />

training process. The working group IEEE-LTSC (Learning Technology Standards<br />

Committee) defines the OP as “any numerical or non-numerical entity which can be<br />

used, reused or referenced during the computer-support learning activity”.<br />

To clear away any possible confusion, Strijker (2004) removes the non-numerical<br />

data, like books and libraries, from the conceptual definition. Wisconsin University<br />

(Wisc-Online, 2007) defines the pedagogical objects as “small autonomous learning<br />

units in line; they are small enough to be well-integrated into an educational activity, a<br />

lesson, a module or a course”. According to Hernadez et al. (2008), an OP represents<br />

“a semantic unit of learning resource”. In its assessment evaluation methodologies of<br />

distance learning educational standards, the Romanian Agency for Quality Assurance<br />

in Higher Education (ARACIS) defines the learning unit as “the structural element of<br />

the course, which is unitary from thematic standpoint, integrates a set of specific skills<br />

and, finally, is completed by an evaluation. This is equivalent to one or more chapters<br />

of a semester course”.<br />

Pernin (2003) classifies the pedagogical objects into three fundamental categories,<br />

which are:<br />

� pedagogical units, which allow the structuring of the training and its<br />

organization in space and time;<br />

� pedagogical activities, which define the certain modalities of acquisition,<br />

validation and communication of one or more knowledge (the IMS-LD standard<br />

was specifically developed to define learning scenarios);<br />

� pedagogical, physical and numerical resources required by the carrying out of<br />

the activities.<br />

Our research work is aimed at the pedagogical objects representing learning units,<br />

also-called learning objects.<br />

An OP is often segmented into a finer granulation to allocate the production activity<br />

between different actors (Charlet et al., 2008). A granule represents a pedagogical<br />

object meaning the smallest possible learning pedagogical unit of a pedagogical<br />

pathway. According to IEEE-LTSC (2002) an OP can develop from the smallest<br />

possible learning pedagogical unit to a complete course. Depending on the granularity<br />

level, an OP can be classified in two categories: an elemental OP (text, image, video<br />

and animation) and a composite OP. Each pedagogical object (OP) can be composed<br />

of one or more Web pages, each of these representing different parts of the reference<br />

corpus.<br />

~ 498 ~

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!