18.12.2012 Views

Proceedings

Proceedings

Proceedings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CONCLUSIONS<br />

There is no universal theory of capital structure, and no reason to expect one. There<br />

are useful conditional theories, however. The theories differ in their relative emphasis<br />

on the factors that could affect the choice between debt and equity These factors<br />

include agency costs, taxes, differences in information, and the effects of market<br />

imperfections or institutional or regulatory constraints. Each factor could be dominant<br />

for some companies or in some circumstances, yet unimportant elsewhere.<br />

Financing policy for Romanian companies is based on debt financing, with a level of<br />

indebtedness which varies between 60-70%, except companies listed on the first<br />

category at BSE for which the indebtedness varies between 30-40%. The explication<br />

for these differences in results is explained by main criteria for listing at the first<br />

category at BSE: the value of equity must be more than 30 million Euros, Romanian<br />

capital market having a small number of companies with such volume of financial<br />

resources.<br />

However, the results achieved in the case study, did not show that higher borrowing<br />

by companies in Romania was a hazardous activity very risky or undisciplined. The<br />

existence of a high degree of financial leverage is explained by the importance of<br />

using financial resources for the acquisition of current assets, the lack of equity and<br />

fiscal policy.<br />

The purpose of this study was to provide some empirical evidences on the linkage<br />

between company’s capital, as it is this reflected by the financial leverage, companylevel<br />

factors that affect capital structure. In a linear simple regression model, we<br />

found a negative correlation between financial leverage, return on operational income<br />

to total assets or growth opportunities and a positive correlation between financial<br />

leverage, the rate of tangible assets or turnover.<br />

Of course this study have several limits both on conceptual as well as on empirical<br />

level. Among this:<br />

1. The use of return of operating income to total assets ratio instead of EBIT on<br />

total sales ratio. The main reason for such substitution is connected to the real<br />

sectors ‘prices rigidities and slow adjustments mechanism in an inflationary<br />

environment. Thus, we had considered that the total assets reflect better the<br />

output of the company’s operational activities.<br />

2. The short-time span considered, the limited numbers of traded companies<br />

included the absence of split by sectors, the absence of any references to the<br />

inter-correlation between stocks as well as between stocks and global market<br />

dynamic, some robustness of the estimated coefficient problems revealed by<br />

the existence of certain autocorrelations in estimation residuals etc.<br />

Despite the resulted caveats, we are identifying the similar trends between Romanian<br />

companies and companies from other emerging countries, regarding the financial<br />

leverage and company-level factors and further investigation are relevant for a better<br />

understanding of capital structure formation mechanisms.<br />

~ 819 ~

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!