18.12.2012 Views

Proceedings

Proceedings

Proceedings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

source of rich data, it is labour intensive and time consuming methodology (Boesso<br />

and Kumar, 2007; Striukova et al. 2008). As such, it is fairly common to find a<br />

relatively small sample size in studies using this methodology<br />

2.4 Methodology used for the analysis of the determinants of ICD<br />

In order to analyse the determinants of ICD, we constructed an IC disclosure index<br />

(ICD_Index) for each company which had a common base containing the 33 IC items.<br />

In constructing the disclosure index, dichotomous scoring for each of the 33 IC items<br />

was used (disclosure =1, non-disclosure =0). Hence, the maximum possible score<br />

attainable by a company was 33 with a minimum theoretical score of 0. Furthermore,<br />

ICD_Index is used to test (through descriptive statistics, T test, Pearson correlation and<br />

multiple regression analysis) whether certain factors such company size and industry<br />

type influence ICD.<br />

2.4.1 Measure of ICD_Index (dependent variables)<br />

Based on the total of the 33 IC items, we are constructing a weighted disclosure index<br />

calculated in accordance with the following formula:<br />

n<br />

∑<br />

i=<br />

1<br />

ICD_Index = ( di / M ) x100<br />

percent<br />

Where ICD_Index is the disclosure index dependent variable, di expresses item i<br />

when the item’s value is 1 with disclosure and 0 when there was no disclosure, and M<br />

is 33 (the total number of items being measured).<br />

2.4. 2 Measure of company size and industry type (independent variables)<br />

This section describes how the independent variables are measured.<br />

Size: Researchers have commonly used different measures such as sales, revenue,<br />

asset, and number of employees, as proxies for company size. Alternative proxies of<br />

firm size include total assets (Oliveira et al., 2006; Bruggen et al., 2009); turnover<br />

(Bozzolan et al., 2003; Bozzolan et al., 2006; Oliveira et al., 2006); market<br />

capitalization (Garcıa-Meca et al., 2005; Oliveira et al., 2006; White et al., 2007;<br />

White et al., 2010); and number of employees (Oliveira et al., 2006; Boesso and<br />

Kumar, 2007; Huang et al., 2010). While market capitalization is a market-related<br />

characteristic, the other three proxies are structure-related characteristics. For our<br />

study we shall use as a proxy the company turnover (sales) for the year ending 31<br />

December 2009 as we consider turnover to give us the market share no matter what<br />

market one may refer to. Total assets are not that relevant unless comparison is made<br />

within the same industry; the number of employees is less relevant as there industry<br />

types that can be more labour intensive than other. For the purposes of our study, size<br />

is measured as the natural logarithm of the firm’s sales taken from annual reports as of<br />

31 December 2009.<br />

Industry type: To capture the influence of industry on the voluntary disclosure of<br />

intangibles information, we use a dichotomous variable (applying 1 for firms<br />

belonging to high intangibles intensive industries; and 0 otherwise). Similar to other<br />

studies in this area, we separate between traditional industries such as food,<br />

automobiles, chemicals, construction, electronics, manufacturing, oil, utilities,<br />

~ 404 ~

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!