18.12.2012 Views

Proceedings

Proceedings

Proceedings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

No. Firms<br />

Overall<br />

Disclosures<br />

XBRL<br />

Index-Score<br />

(54 items)<br />

~ 747 ~<br />

Financial<br />

Information<br />

Index-Score<br />

(40 items)<br />

Nonfinancial<br />

Information<br />

Index-Score<br />

(10 items)<br />

14 Comcast Corp 0.1296 0.1250 0.10 0.25<br />

15 Consol Energy Inc 0.1111 0.1000 0.10 0.25<br />

16 CSX Corp 0.1111 0.1000 0.10 0.25<br />

17 Du Pont E I De Nemours & Co 0.1111 0.1000 0.10 0.25<br />

18 Edgar Online Inc 0.1111 0.1000 0.10 0.25<br />

19 Englobal Corp 0.0370 0.0500 0.00 0.00<br />

20 Erie Indemnity 0.1852 0.1750 0.10 0.50<br />

21 Fastenal Co 0.1111 0.1000 0.10 0.25<br />

22 Fluor Corp 0.1111 0.1000 0.10 0.25<br />

23 General Electric Co 0.0926 0.1000 0.00 0.25<br />

24 General Mills Inc 0.0741 0.1000 0.00 0.00<br />

25 HCP Inc 0.1296 0.1250 0.10 0.25<br />

26 Icu Medical Inc 0.0926 0.1000 0.00 0.25<br />

27 International Paper 0.1111 0.1000 0.10 0.25<br />

28 IBM 0.1481 0.1500 0.10 0.25<br />

29 Itron Inc 0.0926 0.1000 0.00 0.25<br />

30 Liberty Global Inc 0.1296 0.1250 0.10 0.25<br />

31 Microsoft Corp 0.4074 0.4000 0.40 0.50<br />

32 Newmont Mining Corp 0.1296 0.1250 0.10 0.25<br />

33 Noble Energy Inc 0.1111 0.1000 0.10 0.25<br />

34 Northrop Grumman Corp 0.1296 0.1250 0.10 0.25<br />

35 Omnicom Group Inc 0.0926 0.1000 0.00 0.25<br />

36 On Semiconductor Corp 0.1111 0.1000 0.10 0.25<br />

37 Papa Johns Int Co 0.1296 0.1250 0.10 0.25<br />

38 Pepsico Inc 0.0926 0.1000 0.00 0.25<br />

39 PG & E Corp 0.0926 0.1000 0.00 0.25<br />

40 Pitney Bowes Inc 0.1111 0.1000 0.10 0.25<br />

41 Praxair 0.0926 0.1000 0.00 0.25<br />

42 Progress Energy Inc 0.1296 0.1250 0.10 0.25<br />

43 Prologis 0.4815 0.5000 0.50 0.25<br />

44 R.R. Donnelley & Sons Co 0.1111 0.1000 0.10 0.25<br />

45 Sandridge Energy Inc 0.1111 0.1000 0.10 0.25<br />

46 Southwest Airlines Co 0.0926 0.1000 0.00 0.25<br />

47 Ultra Petroleum Corp 0.1296 0.1250 0.10 0.25<br />

48 United Technologies Corp 0.3889 0.4000 0.40 0.25<br />

49 Unitedhealth Group Inc 0.1111 0.1000 0.10 0.25<br />

50 Western Union Co 0.1296 0.1250 0.10 0.25<br />

51 Xerox Corp 0.4259 0.4500 0.40 0.25<br />

4.2. Model Development<br />

General<br />

Information<br />

Index-Score<br />

(4 items)<br />

Earlier discussion has suggested that there is no theoretically correct way to describe<br />

the link between dependent and independent variables (Lang and Lundholm 1993;<br />

Cooke 1998). Therefore, Lang and Lundholm (1993), as well as Wallace et al. (1994),<br />

suggested the use of ranked (OLS) regression as a technique for coping with data sets<br />

with non-linear and monotonic relations between dependent and independent<br />

variables (Lang and Lundholm 1993). Following Camfferman and Cooke (2002) and<br />

Alsaeed (2006), this study uses the unranked OLS approach. It is worth noting that the<br />

essence of the quality of disclosure as the dependent variable is not firmly defined.<br />

Wallace et al. (1994), as well as Camfferman and Cooke (2002), used the term of<br />

comprehensiveness. Following Patton and Zelenka (1997), I use the term of extent as<br />

the dependent variable.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!