18.12.2012 Views

Proceedings

Proceedings

Proceedings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

250 Japanese companies are listed on EU exchanges, using Japanese GAAP, whereas<br />

approximately 10 companies from IFRS countries are listed in Japan.<br />

The road towards the adoption of IFRS has started in October 2000 when an advisory<br />

body of the Ministry of Finance (Business Accounting Deliberation Council - BADC)<br />

decided to make Japanese GAAP more compatible with IAS. However, in 2001, a<br />

newly created organization was entrusted with the accounting standard setting<br />

function - ASBJ - and an oversight foundation similar to IASB Foundation was<br />

created as well - Financial Accounting Standards Foundation (FASF).<br />

Four years later, ASBJ and IASB launched a joint convergence project between<br />

Japanese GAAP and IFRS. In addition, the Committee of European Securities<br />

Regulators (CESR) completed its review on the equivalence of Japanese, American<br />

and Canadian GAAPs with IFRS and recommended the European Commission to<br />

declare the three sets of GAAP equivalent to IFRS, subject to limited changes, which<br />

were considered significant by CESR. As a response to the CESR report, in October<br />

2006, the ASBJ released its “Project Plan Concerning the Development of Japanese<br />

Accounting Standards”, which identified 26 accounting issues to address in order for<br />

the EU to permit Japanese companies to trade on European securities markets.<br />

In 2007, with the signing of the "Tokyo Agreement", ASBJ and the IASB laid out<br />

short term convergence projects to be completed by 2011. As part of the agreement<br />

the two boards will seek to eliminate by 2008 major differences between Japanese<br />

GAAP and IFRS (as defined by the July 2005 CESR assessment of equivalence), with<br />

the remaining differences being removed on or before 30 June 2011. As a<br />

consequence, revisions were made to Japanese GAAP and at the end of 2008; the EC<br />

established that Japanese GAAP are “equivalent” to IFRS.<br />

BADC<br />

decides on<br />

compatibility<br />

with IAS<br />

2000<br />

2001<br />

ASBJ is<br />

founded<br />

Figure 3. Timeline of IFRS adoption in Japan<br />

ASBJ +<br />

IASB<br />

launched<br />

joint<br />

convergence<br />

project (CP)<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

ASBJ<br />

released<br />

JGAAP<br />

development<br />

plan with IAS<br />

Tokyo<br />

Agreement<br />

2007<br />

On 11 December 2009, the Financial Services Authority of Japan (FSA) issued an<br />

order allowing certain listed domestic companies voluntarily to start using<br />

“designated IFRSs” in their consolidated financial statements starting from the fiscal<br />

year ending 31 March 2010. The “designated IFRSs” are all approved by the FSA and<br />

the list includes all IFRS and Interpretations issued before 30 June 2009. Those<br />

companies not choosing to adopt “designated IFRSs”, must use Japanese GAAP. The<br />

domestic companies using US GAAP must cease to do so after 31 March 2016.<br />

~ 949 ~<br />

2008<br />

EU announces<br />

JGAAP<br />

equivalence<br />

FSA allows<br />

voluntarily<br />

use of<br />

“designate<br />

d IFRSs”<br />

2009<br />

CPs<br />

2010<br />

2011<br />

CPs<br />

???<br />

2012<br />

FSA decision<br />

on the<br />

mandatory<br />

adoption of<br />

IFRS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!