08.01.2013 Views

Steel Designers Manual - TheBestFriend.org

Steel Designers Manual - TheBestFriend.org

Steel Designers Manual - TheBestFriend.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

This material is copyright - all rights reserved. Reproduced under licence from The <strong>Steel</strong> Construction Institute on 12/2/2007<br />

To buy a hardcopy version of this document call 01344 872775 or go to http://shop.steelbiz.<strong>org</strong>/<br />

<strong>Steel</strong> <strong>Designers</strong>' <strong>Manual</strong> - 6th Edition (2003)<br />

116 Industrial steelwork<br />

based examination of the expected frequency and duration of such unusual conditions<br />

is made, leading to the adoption of reduced load factors without reducing the<br />

overall factor of safety. Comparisons with, for example, wind loading can be used<br />

to establish on a reasonably logical basis the appropriate load factors.<br />

By definition, items of fixed plant can be treated as dead load in accordance<br />

with BS 6399: Part 1 2 when specific location and loads are known. At the early<br />

stages of design it is usual to adopt a relatively large imposed loading which will<br />

have to cater for fixed items of plant or equipment, the existence of which may not<br />

even be known at this stage and certainly not the location and loading data. The<br />

choice of what imposed loading to use at this stage can be assisted by the following<br />

guidance:<br />

very light industrial processes 7.5 kN/m 2<br />

medium/average industrial processes 10–15 kN/m 2<br />

very heavy industrial processes 20–30 kN/m 2<br />

One factor which will influence the choice within these values is the timing of the<br />

release of final plant and equipment design data in relation to the steelwork design<br />

and fabrication detailing process. If a second-stage design is possible then a lower<br />

imposed load can be allowed since local variations needed to account for specific<br />

items of fixed plant which exceed the imposed plan loading allowance can be<br />

accommodated.<br />

Under these conditions it can also be worthwhile, particularly for designers with<br />

previous experience of the industrial process, to design columns and foundations<br />

for a lower imposed loading than beams. In certain layouts with long span main<br />

beams or girders at wide spacings this preliminary reduction can also be used<br />

for these members. It should be stressed that these proposals are not intended to<br />

contradict or override the particular reduced loading clauses in BS 6399, 2 but are a<br />

practical suggestion for the preliminary design stage.<br />

When detailed plant layouts with location and loading data become available,<br />

fixed plant and equipment can be considered as dead load and subject therefore to<br />

the appropriate load factor, 1.4 instead of 1.6. Remaining zones of floor space<br />

without major items of plant should be allocated an imposed load which should<br />

reflect only the access and potential use of the floor and may therefore very well be<br />

reduced from the preliminary imposed loading, often in the range of 5–10 kN/m 2 .<br />

Specific laydown areas for removal, replacement or maintenance of heavy plant<br />

are the only likely exceptions to this range of loading.<br />

An alternative scheme for dealing with the second stage of loading information<br />

is to institute a checking procedure where the equivalent loading intensity of plant<br />

and equipment is calculated for each item as follows:<br />

14 .<br />

16 . ¥<br />

weight ( kN)<br />

plan area m 2<br />

( )<br />

the factor 1.4/1.6 being introduced to cater for the reclassification from imposed<br />

load to dead load.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!