08.01.2013 Views

Steel Designers Manual - TheBestFriend.org

Steel Designers Manual - TheBestFriend.org

Steel Designers Manual - TheBestFriend.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

This material is copyright - all rights reserved. Reproduced under licence from The <strong>Steel</strong> Construction Institute on 12/2/2007<br />

To buy a hardcopy version of this document call 01344 872775 or go to http://shop.steelbiz.<strong>org</strong>/<br />

<strong>Steel</strong> <strong>Designers</strong>' <strong>Manual</strong> - 6th Edition (2003)<br />

Chapter 13<br />

Local buckling and<br />

cross-section classification<br />

by DAVID NETHERCOT<br />

13.1 Introduction<br />

The efficient use of material within a steel member requires those structural properties<br />

which most influence its load-carrying capacity to be maximized.This, coupled<br />

with the need to make connections between members, has led to the majority of<br />

structural sections being thin-walled as illustrated in Fig. 13.1. Moreover, apart from<br />

circular tubes, structural steel sections (such as universal beams and columns, coldformed<br />

purlins, built-up box columns and plate girders) normally comprise a series<br />

of flat plate elements. Simple considerations of minimum material consumption<br />

frequently suggest that some plate elements be made extremely thin but limits<br />

must be imposed if certain potentially undesirable structural phenomena are to<br />

be avoided. The most important of these in everyday steelwork design is local<br />

buckling.<br />

Figure 13.2 shows a short UC section after it has been tested as a column. Considerable<br />

distortion of the cross-section is evident with the flanges being deformed<br />

out of their original flat shape. The web, on the other hand, appears to be comparatively<br />

undeformed. The buckling has therefore been confined to certain plate elements,<br />

has not resulted in any overall deformation of the member, and its centroidal<br />

axis has not deflected. In the particular example of Fig. 13.2, local buckling did not<br />

develop significantly until well after the column had sustained its ‘squash load’ equal<br />

to the product of its cross-sectional area times its material strength. Local buckling<br />

did not affect the load-carrying capacity because the proportions of the web and<br />

flange plates are sufficiently compact. The fact that the local buckling appeared in<br />

the flanges before the web is due to these elements being the more slender.<br />

Terms such as compact and slender are used to describe the proportions of the<br />

individual plate elements of structural sections based on their susceptibility to local<br />

buckling. The most important governing property is the ratio of plate width to plate<br />

thickness, b, often referred to as the b/t ratio. Other factors that have some influence<br />

are material strength, the type of stress system to which the plate is subjected,<br />

the support conditions provided, and whether the section is produced by hot-rolling<br />

or welding.<br />

Although the rigorous treatment of plate buckling is a mathematically complex<br />

topic, 1 it is possible to design safely and in most cases economically with no direct<br />

consideration of the subject. For example, the properties of the majority of standard<br />

hot-rolled sections have been selected to be such that local buckling effects are<br />

373

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!