08.01.2013 Views

Steel Designers Manual - TheBestFriend.org

Steel Designers Manual - TheBestFriend.org

Steel Designers Manual - TheBestFriend.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

This material is copyright - all rights reserved. Reproduced under licence from The <strong>Steel</strong> Construction Institute on 12/2/2007<br />

To buy a hardcopy version of this document call 01344 872775 or go to http://shop.steelbiz.<strong>org</strong>/<br />

<strong>Steel</strong> <strong>Designers</strong>' <strong>Manual</strong> - 6th Edition (2003)<br />

and ground beams of a piled foundation, and on the frictional sliding resistance<br />

beneath the ground floor slab and the foundations. Therefore, the lateral loading on<br />

the bearing piles would be insignificant.<br />

Lateral load resistance from vertical bearing piles is particularly dependent on<br />

soil type; in the extreme case of very soft soil, raking piles to an underlying more<br />

competent soil or rock would be required to provide any significant resistance.<br />

Lateral load resistance from vertical bearing piles also requires significant pile<br />

displacement, of the order of many centimetres, so if this is unacceptable then the<br />

designer should think of alternative foundation elements to provide it, such as<br />

raking piles or embedded sheet pile perimeter walls.<br />

Where the contribution to lateral loading resistance of vertical bearing piles is<br />

vital and is an acceptable solution, the designer is recommended to use CIRIA<br />

Report 103 Design of laterally loaded piles 14 and the textbooks by Poulos and<br />

Davis, 15 or Tomlinson. 16<br />

Methods of analysis<br />

The two most extensively validated methods are the P–Y curve method and elastic<br />

continuum analysis FE programs. Both are explained in CIRIA Report 103. 14<br />

P–Y curves originate from instrumented lateral load tests carried out on 762 mm<br />

OD tubular piles in the USA in the 1960s for offshore design. The models of load<br />

resistance were derived from soil resistance distributions required to match the<br />

bending stresses measured by the pile shaft strain gauge instrumentation, i.e. curvefitting<br />

to match bending moment diagrams. The P–Y curve method is the only one<br />

in which it is possible to allow for significant cyclic loading of piles. This is useful<br />

for the structural design of the pile section, but does not give accurate displacements<br />

because the single piles had no head restraint. It is explained in detail in the<br />

American Petroleum Institute Code RP2A 4 and in computer programs like ‘ALP’<br />

in the OASYS suite. 13<br />

Assessment of soil properties<br />

Bearing piles 879<br />

There are no clear guidelines for the assessment of soil property values to be<br />

adopted for the design of laterally-loaded piles. Many factors influence the actual<br />

mobilized values. In particular, the disturbing effect of pile installation is difficult to<br />

quantify. Most soils exhibit considerable loss of stiffness under the action of cyclic<br />

loading, which is virtually impossible to relate to laboratory test data. Generally, it<br />

is desirable to select upper and lower limits to the critical soil properties, and to<br />

check the sensitivity of the design to variation within the chosen range.<br />

Structural designers would be wise to specify their design requirements for soils<br />

data carefully within a site investigation contract, so that the work includes soil tests<br />

appropriate to the type of loading to be applied to the pile. For example, if granular<br />

soils are found on site then in situ soil testing, such as static cone penetration

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!