08.01.2013 Views

Steel Designers Manual - TheBestFriend.org

Steel Designers Manual - TheBestFriend.org

Steel Designers Manual - TheBestFriend.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

This material is copyright - all rights reserved. Reproduced under licence from The <strong>Steel</strong> Construction Institute on 12/2/2007<br />

To buy a hardcopy version of this document call 01344 872775 or go to http://shop.steelbiz.<strong>org</strong>/<br />

<strong>Steel</strong> <strong>Designers</strong>' <strong>Manual</strong> - 6th Edition (2003)<br />

376 Local buckling and cross-section classification<br />

Fig. 13.3 Rectangular hollow section used as a beam<br />

(b) b 1 < b/T < b 2, full plastic moment capacity Mp is attained but is only maintained<br />

for small rotations and the member is suitable for elastic design using its full<br />

capacity – compact cross-section (Class 2).<br />

(c) b 2 < b/T £ b 3, full elastic moment capacity My (but not Mp) is attained and the<br />

member is suitable for elastic design using this limited capacity – semi-compact<br />

cross-section (Class 3).<br />

(d) b 3 < b/T, local buckling limits moment capacity to less than My – slender crosssection<br />

(Class 4).<br />

The relationship between moment capacity Mu and compression flange slenderness<br />

b/T indicating the various b limits is illustrated diagrammatically in Fig. 13.5.<br />

In the figure the value of Mu for a semi-compact section is conservatively taken as<br />

the moment corresponding to extreme fibre yield My for all values of b/T between<br />

b 2 and b 3. This is more convenient for practical calculation than the more correct<br />

representation shown in Fig. 13.4 in which a moment between My and Mp is<br />

indicated. Since the classification of the section as plastic, compact, etc., is based on<br />

considerations of the compression flange alone, the assumption concerning the web<br />

slenderness d/t is that its classification is the same as or better than that of the flange.<br />

For example, if the section is semi-compact, governed by the flange proportions,<br />

then the web must be plastic, compact or semi-compact; it cannot be slender.<br />

If the situation is reversed so that the webs are the controlling elements, then the<br />

same four categories, based on the same definitions of moment–rotation behaviour,<br />

are now determined by the value of web slenderness d/t. However, the governing<br />

values of b 1, b 2 and b 3 change since the web stress distribution differs from the pure<br />

compression in the top flange. Since the rectangular fully plastic condition, the triangular<br />

elastic condition and any intermediate condition contain less compression,<br />

the values of b are larger. Thus section classification also depends upon the type of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!