08.01.2013 Views

Steel Designers Manual - TheBestFriend.org

Steel Designers Manual - TheBestFriend.org

Steel Designers Manual - TheBestFriend.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

This material is copyright - all rights reserved. Reproduced under licence from The <strong>Steel</strong> Construction Institute on 12/2/2007<br />

To buy a hardcopy version of this document call 01344 872775 or go to http://shop.steelbiz.<strong>org</strong>/<br />

<strong>Steel</strong> <strong>Designers</strong>' <strong>Manual</strong> - 6th Edition (2003)<br />

152 Bridges<br />

prestressed. The longitudinal reinforcement, however, acts as part of the composite<br />

section. Most composite bridges are designed as ‘unpropped’, i.e. the erected steelwork<br />

supports its own weight and the concrete slab (including formwork allowance)<br />

until hardened, with composite action being assumed only for superimposed dead<br />

and live loads. Box girders tend to be used for the long spans. Popular forms include<br />

twin box girders, multiple compact boxes and open top trapezoidal boxes.<br />

Plate girder flanges should be made as wide as possible, consistent with outstand<br />

limitations, to give the best achievable stability during erection and to reduce the<br />

number of intermediate bracings. For practical reasons a desirable minimum width<br />

is about 400 mm. A maximum flange thickness of 65 mm is recommended to avoid<br />

heavy welds.<br />

4.9.3.2 Intermediate supports<br />

Intermediate supports often take the form of reinforced concrete walls, columns or<br />

portals. <strong>Steel</strong> supports may alternatively be used, and tubular columns are efficient,<br />

especially if filled with concrete and designed compositely. Where fewer columns<br />

are required for multiple girders then integral steel crossheads at the supports are<br />

sometimes used.<br />

4.9.3.3 Bracings<br />

For rolled beam or plate girder bridges, lateral bracings are necessary for stability<br />

during erection and concreting of the slab. The bracings are necessary at all supports<br />

and when required in hogging regions of continuous spans. If required by the<br />

designer they may be assumed to contribute to the transverse rigidity of the deck<br />

when carrying out an analysis of the transverse distribution of concentrated live<br />

loads. Generally this is advantageous only for decks wider than 20 m. At the abutments<br />

the bracing can be a rolled section trimmer composite with the slab and supporting<br />

its free end. Over intermediate supports a channel section can be used<br />

between each pair of girders up to about 1.2 m depth. For deeper girders triangulated<br />

bracings are necessary.<br />

Intermediate bracings in hogging regions are typically spaced at about 12¥<br />

(bottom flange width).Where bracing is provided across the full width of the bridge,<br />

i.e. between all girders, it increases transverse stiffness significantly. Because of this<br />

stiffness such bracing will attract high stresses under loading that varies across the<br />

width of the bridge. The effect of this behaviour on the fatigue life of the bracing<br />

needs to be considered. Alternatively bracing should be provided only between<br />

neighbouring pairs of girders as shown in Fig. 4.18. This reduces the transverse stiffness<br />

considerably and alleviates the problem of fatigue. Such a structure is also likely<br />

to be easier to erect. If the bridge is curved in plan with girders fabricated in straight

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!