08.01.2013 Views

Steel Designers Manual - TheBestFriend.org

Steel Designers Manual - TheBestFriend.org

Steel Designers Manual - TheBestFriend.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

This material is copyright - all rights reserved. Reproduced under licence from The <strong>Steel</strong> Construction Institute on 12/2/2007<br />

To buy a hardcopy version of this document call 01344 872775 or go to http://shop.steelbiz.<strong>org</strong>/<br />

<strong>Steel</strong> <strong>Designers</strong>' <strong>Manual</strong> - 6th Edition (2003)<br />

Analysis 827<br />

holding-down bolts should not exceed pygZg, where Zg is the elastic modulus of the<br />

gusset and pyg is the design strength of the gusset (pgy � 270 N/mm 2 ).When the effective<br />

area of the baseplate is less than its gross area, the connections of the gusset<br />

should be checked for the effects of a nominal distribution of bearing pressure on<br />

the gross area as well as for the distribution used in the design.<br />

27.2.2.3 Beam bearing plates<br />

Bearing plates at beam seatings are required to distribute the beam reaction to the<br />

masonry support at stress levels within the capacity of the masonry and to ensure<br />

that the web-crushing capacity of the beam is not exceeded. The distribution of<br />

bearing stresses under the plate is extremely complex although simplifying assumptions<br />

are usually made in appropriate cases.<br />

The bending of the plate, shown in Fig. 27.9 in the direction transverse to the<br />

beam, will depend on the stiffness of the beam flange and the fixing of the flange<br />

to the plate. It is usual to assume that the position of maximum bending is the<br />

outside edge of the root of the web and that the plate carries the whole of the<br />

bending.<br />

In the longitudinal direction, shown in Fig. 27.10, the deflection and rotation of<br />

the beam due to its loading will cause a concentration of bearing at the front edge<br />

and, depending upon the load from above the bearing, a possible lifting of the back<br />

edge of the plate. It is often assumed, therefore, that the distribution will be either<br />

trapezoidal or triangular; possibly the triangle may not reach the back of the<br />

bearing. If it is expected that the front edge concentration will be high the plate is<br />

set back from the front of the pier as shown in Fig. 27.11. This is to reduce the possibility<br />

of spalling at the front of the pier but also has the advantage of applying the<br />

beam reaction more centrally to the masonry.<br />

A method of assessing the rotation of the bearing has been proposed by Lothers.<br />

From this a more accurate estimate of the stress distribution can be made. The<br />

method, however, can only be applied in cases of isolated masonry piers and is<br />

dependent on the homogeneity of the masonry. It may be justified in cases of very<br />

heavy beam reactions provided the workmanship in constructing the pier can be<br />

reasonably guaranteed.<br />

27.3 Analysis<br />

27.3.1 Bolt forces<br />

The area required to transmit the compressive forces under the baseplate is<br />

calculated at the appropriate bearing strength of the concrete. The stress block may<br />

be assumed to be rectangular with a maximum stress of 0.6 fcu where fcu is the char-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!