08.01.2013 Views

Steel Designers Manual - TheBestFriend.org

Steel Designers Manual - TheBestFriend.org

Steel Designers Manual - TheBestFriend.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

This material is copyright - all rights reserved. Reproduced under licence from The <strong>Steel</strong> Construction Institute on 12/2/2007<br />

To buy a hardcopy version of this document call 01344 872775 or go to http://shop.steelbiz.<strong>org</strong>/<br />

<strong>Steel</strong> <strong>Designers</strong>' <strong>Manual</strong> - 6th Edition (2003)<br />

LE<br />

P P<br />

/ L1 / L / L1<br />

Effective lengths 415<br />

Of fundamental importance when determining suitable effective lengths is the<br />

classification of a column as either a sway case for which translation of one end<br />

relative to the other is possible or a non-sway case for which end translation is prevented.<br />

For the first case, effective lengths will be at least equal to the geometrical<br />

length, tending in theory to infinity for a pin-base column with no restraint at its<br />

top, while for the non-sway case, effective lengths will not exceed the geometrical<br />

length, decreasing as the degree of rotational fixity increases.<br />

For non-standard cases, it is customary to make reference to published results<br />

obtained from elastic stability theory. Provided these relate to cases for which buckling<br />

involves the interaction of a group of members with the less critical restraining<br />

the more critical, as illustrated in Fig. 15.9, such evidence as is available suggests<br />

that the use of effective lengths derived directly from elastic stability theory in conjunction<br />

with a column design curve of the type shown in Fig. 15.3 will lead to good<br />

approximations of the true load-carrying capacity.<br />

For compression members in rigid-jointed frames the effective length may, in both<br />

cases, be directly related to the restraint provided by the surrounding members<br />

by using charts presented in terms of the stiffness of these members provided in<br />

Appendix E of BS 5950: Part 1. Useful guidance on effective column lengths for a<br />

variety of more complex situations is available from several sources. 2–4<br />

When designing compression members in frames configured on the basis of<br />

simple construction, the use of effective column lengths provides a simple means<br />

of recognizing that real connections between members will normally provide some<br />

degree of rotational end restraint, leading to compressive strengths somewhat in<br />

excess of those that would be obtained if columns were treated as pin-ended. If axial<br />

load levels and unsupported lengths change within the length of a member that is<br />

continuous over several segments, such as a building frame column spliced so as to<br />

act as a continuous member but carrying decreasing compression with height or a<br />

compression chord in a truss, then the less heavily loaded segments will effectively<br />

restrain the more critical segments.<br />

Even though the distribution of internal member forces has been made on the<br />

assumption of pin joints, some allowance for rotational end restraint when designing<br />

the compression members is therefore appropriate. Thus the apparent contradiction<br />

of regarding a structure as pin-jointed but using compression member<br />

effective lengths that are less than their actual lengths does have a basis founded<br />

upon an approximate version of reality. Figure 15.10 resents results obtained from<br />

elastic stability theory for columns continuous over a number of storeys which show<br />

Fig. 15.9 Restraint to critical column segment from adjacent segments

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!