08.01.2013 Views

Steel Designers Manual - TheBestFriend.org

Steel Designers Manual - TheBestFriend.org

Steel Designers Manual - TheBestFriend.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

This material is copyright - all rights reserved. Reproduced under licence from The <strong>Steel</strong> Construction Institute on 12/2/2007<br />

To buy a hardcopy version of this document call 01344 872775 or go to http://shop.steelbiz.<strong>org</strong>/<br />

<strong>Steel</strong> <strong>Designers</strong>' <strong>Manual</strong> - 6th Edition (2003)<br />

494 Plate girders<br />

force component in the flange if the beam soffit is haunched), a force to account<br />

for the destabilizing effect of the web, forces from any local cross bracing (including<br />

forces from restraint systems), and a force due to the tension field. The derivation<br />

of these is far more precise and lengthy than BS 5950: Part 1: 2000 requires,<br />

largely because plate girders in bridges are usually part of a much more complex<br />

structural system than in buildings.<br />

Bearing stiffeners are almost always placed symmetrically about the web centreline.<br />

Stiffeners that are symmetrical about the axis perpendicular to the web, i.e. flats<br />

or tees rather than angles, are preferred.<br />

17.6.2.8 Intermediate stiffeners (clause 9.13 of the Code)<br />

Intermediate stiffeners are usually placed on one side of the web only. Standard flat<br />

sizes should be used. BS 5400: Part 3 does not prescribe stiffness criteria for intermediate<br />

stiffeners (which have an associated length of web), but it does prescribe<br />

design forces for which these stiffeners are designed, similar to those outlined for<br />

bearing stiffeners.<br />

17.6.3 Design of beams at the serviceability limit state<br />

In practice, due to the proportions of partial safety factors at the ultimate and<br />

serviceability limits, the serviceability check on the steel section is automatically<br />

satisfied if designs are satisfactory at the ultimate stage.<br />

The design of beams is carried out using an elastic strain distribution throughout<br />

the cross-section, in a manner generally similar to that used at the ultimate limit but<br />

with different partial safety factors, i.e. different values of gfL, gm and gf3. The determination<br />

of effective section must take account of shear lag, where appropriate.<br />

Stresses should be checked at critical points in the steel member to ensure<br />

that no permanent deformation due to yielding takes place. 8–10 Plastic moment<br />

resistance is not considered at the serviceability limit state.<br />

In composite construction, crack widths in the concrete deck may often govern<br />

the design at the serviceability limit state. For non-compact sections the analysis at<br />

the ultimate limit state is carried out using a triangular (elastic) stress distribution.<br />

Consequently the serviceability limit check for bending is always satisfied, since the<br />

factors are less than those at the ultimate limit state.The Code lists the clauses which<br />

require checking at both limit states.<br />

17.6.4 Fatigue<br />

Fatigue should be checked with reference to BS 5400: Part 10. Generally it is only<br />

bracing connections, stiffeners and shear connectors, and their welding to the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!