08.01.2013 Views

Steel Designers Manual - TheBestFriend.org

Steel Designers Manual - TheBestFriend.org

Steel Designers Manual - TheBestFriend.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

This material is copyright - all rights reserved. Reproduced under licence from The <strong>Steel</strong> Construction Institute on 12/2/2007<br />

To buy a hardcopy version of this document call 01344 872775 or go to http://shop.steelbiz.<strong>org</strong>/<br />

<strong>Steel</strong> <strong>Designers</strong>' <strong>Manual</strong> - 6th Edition (2003)<br />

254 Fracture and fatigue<br />

then knowing two of the three parameters maximum stress, crack size and fracture<br />

toughness will allow the limiting value of the third parameter to be determined.<br />

For example, if the maximum allowable stress is 160 MPa and the maximum<br />

allowable crack size in an edge cracked plate, where Y = 1.12, is 100 mm then<br />

the minimum fracture toughness of the material must be 100 MPa to avoid<br />

fracture. (Remember that it is important to keep track of the units and 1 MPa<br />

= 31.62 N.mm-1.5 m<br />

m<br />

.)<br />

It has been found by experiment that the fracture toughness value measured in<br />

a laboratory is influenced by the dimensions of the specimen. In particular, the<br />

size and thickness of the specimen and the length of the remaining uncracked<br />

section, called the ligament, control the level of constraint at the crack tip. Constraint<br />

is the development of a triaxial stress state which restricts the deformation<br />

of the material. Thick specimens, which generate high constraint or plane strain<br />

conditions, give lower values of the fracture toughness than those found from thin<br />

specimens under low constraint or plane stress conditions. The least dimensions<br />

to give the maximum constraint, and hence the minimum value of toughness, are<br />

when:<br />

Ê K<br />

thickness, width and ligament ≥ 2.5Á<br />

Ë s<br />

Ic<br />

y<br />

(7.3)<br />

This ensures that the localised plasticity at the crack tip is less than 2% of any of<br />

the dimensions of the body and therefore does not disturb the elastic crack tip stress<br />

field.<br />

The size requirement of Equation (7.3) gives rise to practical problems in testing.<br />

For example, steel with a room temperature yield strength of 275 N.mm-2 and a<br />

minimum fracture toughness of 70 MPa needs to be tested using a specimen at<br />

least 160 mm thick to ensure plane strain conditions. In reality, much structural steelwork<br />

is made from sections substantially thinner than this and its fracture toughness<br />

will be significantly higher. It is good practice in many engineering disciplines<br />

to measure fracture toughness values using specimens of similar thickness to the<br />

proposed application.<br />

Tables 3 to 7 in BS 5950: 20007 define, as a function of temperature, the maximum<br />

thickness of steel that should be used to avoid brittle fracture. This is the same as<br />

BS 5400-3: 20008 m<br />

for steel bridge design. Both BS 5400 and BS 5950 are consistent<br />

with, but generally more conservative than, the minimum thickness to ensure plane<br />

strain conditions, as estimated from Equation (7.3). This means that the toughness<br />

of the steel in use should be better than the minimum value achievable in thick<br />

sections.<br />

Linear elastic fracture mechanics is of much greater use on the lower shelf of<br />

the ductile-brittle behaviour of steels than on the upper shelf. At low temperatures,<br />

the yield strength is higher, the fracture toughness much lower and plane strain<br />

conditions can be achieved in relatively thin sections. On the upper shelf, linear<br />

elastic fracture mechanics tends to be inapplicable, and other techniques need to be<br />

used.<br />

ˆ<br />

˜<br />

¯<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!