30.01.2013 Views

World Oil Outlook - Opec

World Oil Outlook - Opec

World Oil Outlook - Opec

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

came onstream during 2011, combined with a lack of new projects. The net effect<br />

of these changes is a further shift of new refining capacity to developing countries<br />

in the medium-term.<br />

Distillation capacity requirements<br />

Prospects for future utilization rates are often seen as a good indicator of margins –<br />

and, thus, profitability – for the refining business. Utilization rates depend on the<br />

set of factors that comprise developments in demand for refined products, including<br />

their mix, the structure of available feedstock, existing refining capacity and changes<br />

therein. Prospects for supply and demand shifts in the medium-term were described<br />

in Section One. In the first section of Chapter 6, incremental distillation capacity resulting<br />

from existing projects globally was assessed at 7.2 mb/d during the 2012–2016<br />

period, with regional details provided in Table 6.1. In addition to the announced<br />

projects, however, there are two other elements related to future distillation capacity<br />

that need to be taken into consideration: additions achieved through minor ‘debottlenecking’<br />

within existing facilities (often during maintenance turnarounds and<br />

usually referred to as ‘capacity creep’) and refinery closures.<br />

Capacity creep most often focuses on small expansions in crude distillation<br />

and major upgrading units. The extent of these additions typically varies between<br />

regions. For the purpose of this WOO, it is assumed that additions achieved annually<br />

through capacity creep are around 0.2% of established capacity – or about<br />

0.8 mb/d globally in respect to crude distillation capacity from 2011–2016. Some<br />

sources refer to much higher levels of capacity creep (at times reaching more than<br />

double this level), but these stem from a rather variable definition of ‘creep’, which<br />

sometimes includes not only larger projects, but every expansion that is not a new<br />

refinery. The conservative estimate of capacity creep applied here is tightly linked to<br />

the very detailed list of projects that was used for the capacity assessment. In other<br />

words, what other sources typically include within the category of ‘creep’ (expansions<br />

in the range of 5,000 to 10,000 b/d, or larger) are often explicitly identified as<br />

individual projects on the list used for the projects assessment. Consequently, only<br />

a small level of creep was allowed in order to cover minor expansions that are ‘under<br />

the radar’ and not on the detailed projects lists. By adding in the effect of capacity<br />

creep, crude distillation capacity is seen as increasing by 8 mb/d by 2016, from the<br />

2011 base level.<br />

The issue of capacity closures is more complex. The past three years have seen<br />

a very turbulent period for the downstream sector. Almost on a weekly basis, media<br />

have reported on low utilization rates, negative margins, refineries up for sale (or idled<br />

and restarted again) shut downs for maintenance, then extended maintenance, band<br />

183<br />

Chapter<br />

6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!