A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Etheses - Queen Margaret ...
A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Etheses - Queen Margaret ...
A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Etheses - Queen Margaret ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
199<br />
It would be <strong>in</strong>flated to talk <strong>of</strong> a „conspiracy‟ between broadcasters and their larger<br />
public here; ill-considered unaware complicity will do (Hoggart, 2005:67).<br />
Hoggart contends that the reason why media producers don‟t go <strong>in</strong> for serious critical<br />
analysis <strong>of</strong> the structural causes <strong>of</strong> human unhapp<strong>in</strong>ess is that they consider this would bore<br />
their consumers. On behalf <strong>of</strong> its audiences, the media occupies a role as a gatekeeper:<br />
keep<strong>in</strong>g out not so much obviously undesirable elements such as rank obscenity or<br />
malicious slander but worry<strong>in</strong>g elements, elements which the anonymous audience<br />
simply „might not like‟ – <strong>in</strong>tellectual criticisms <strong>of</strong> some popular attitudes, anyth<strong>in</strong>g<br />
remotely judgemental <strong>of</strong> those attitudes (Hoggart, 2005:71).<br />
Broadcasters, celebrities, disabled people, all participate <strong>in</strong> the daily reproduction <strong>of</strong><br />
disabl<strong>in</strong>g social relations because this seems right and because they cannot see how it could<br />
be different. If neither oppressors nor oppressed recognise their roles, but <strong>in</strong>stead perceive<br />
the world as it is as the result <strong>of</strong> a natural order<strong>in</strong>g, it becomes difficult to name oppression.<br />
While everybody is absorbed with their own unique importance as <strong>in</strong>dividuals, as with<strong>in</strong> a<br />
discipl<strong>in</strong>ary society each is required to be, this nam<strong>in</strong>g becomes <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly difficult.<br />
Pierre Bourdieu muses:<br />
Sometimes I want to go back over every word the television newspeople use, <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
without th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g and with no idea <strong>of</strong> the difficulty and the seriousness <strong>of</strong> the subjects<br />
they are talk<strong>in</strong>g about or the responsibilities they assume by talk<strong>in</strong>g about them <strong>in</strong><br />
front <strong>of</strong> the thousands <strong>of</strong> people who watch the news without understand<strong>in</strong>g what<br />
they see and without understand<strong>in</strong>g that they don‟t understand. Because these words<br />
do th<strong>in</strong>gs, they make th<strong>in</strong>gs – they create phantasms, fears, and phobias, or simply<br />
false representations (Bourdieu, 1998:20).<br />
While Bourdieu refers here to newsreaders‟ uses <strong>of</strong> words <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Islam, Islamic,<br />
Islamicist, there are plenty <strong>of</strong> other words to which Bourdieu‟s reflection could similarly be<br />
applied: the disabled, people with disabilities, tragic, brave, triumph, struggl<strong>in</strong>g, suffer<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
overcom<strong>in</strong>g, special, vulnerable, care...