30.01.2013 Views

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Etheses - Queen Margaret ...

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Etheses - Queen Margaret ...

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Etheses - Queen Margaret ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

This is, however, not always an easy process for, as Henri Lefebvre observes:<br />

25<br />

<strong>in</strong> good faith, the <strong>in</strong>dividual – be he bourgeois or proletarian – can deny his<br />

experience <strong>of</strong> social classes s<strong>in</strong>ce objective social reality functions beyond his own<br />

„subjectivity‟, beyond his own private consciousness (Lefebvre, 2008:165).<br />

It is the easiest th<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the world for the impaired <strong>in</strong>dividual to deny his experience <strong>of</strong><br />

disability as a social relationship for the same reason. Paulo Friere comments that<br />

As long as the oppressed rema<strong>in</strong> unaware <strong>of</strong> the causes <strong>of</strong> their condition, they<br />

fatalistically „accept‟ their exploitation. Further, they are apt to react <strong>in</strong> a passive and<br />

alienated manner when confronted with the necessity to struggle for their freedom<br />

and self-affirmation (Friere, 1974:40).<br />

Simon Stevens dist<strong>in</strong>guishes between „real‟ disabled people and politically active disabled<br />

people <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> „the movement‟:<br />

I would argue from experience that many disabled people do not understand the<br />

social model or become <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the politics <strong>of</strong> disability because they are too<br />

busy gett<strong>in</strong>g on with their lives (Stevens, 2008:10).<br />

It is, however, at the everyday level – at which people busily get on with their lives – that<br />

oppression is experienced. The misrecognition <strong>of</strong> oppression does not mean that oppression<br />

does not exist. Iris Young argues that:<br />

The conscious actions <strong>of</strong> many <strong>in</strong>dividuals daily contribute to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and<br />

reproduc<strong>in</strong>g oppression, but these people are usually simply do<strong>in</strong>g their jobs or<br />

liv<strong>in</strong>g their lives and do not understand themselves as agents <strong>of</strong> oppression (Young,<br />

1990:42).<br />

In its nature as structural oppression disability operates subtly through everyday practices<br />

and is therefore difficult to recognise. The cultural imperialism <strong>of</strong> the non-disabled<br />

permeates disabled people‟s lived experience so thoroughly that the possibility <strong>of</strong> its<br />

contestation either goes unnoticed or is explicitly denied. While the disabled people‟s<br />

movement has been an important force <strong>in</strong> the lives <strong>of</strong> many – transform<strong>in</strong>g lives <strong>of</strong> self-<br />

loath<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to lives <strong>of</strong> assertive defiance – there are many more whose lives rema<strong>in</strong><br />

characterised by the experience <strong>of</strong> oppression and dependence.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!