A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Etheses - Queen Margaret ...
A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Etheses - Queen Margaret ...
A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Etheses - Queen Margaret ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
35<br />
essentially a non-tragic view <strong>of</strong> disability and impairment which encompasses<br />
positive social identities, both <strong>in</strong>dividual and collective, for disabled people<br />
grounded <strong>in</strong> the benefits <strong>of</strong> lifestyle <strong>of</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g impaired and disabled‟ (Swa<strong>in</strong> and<br />
French, 2000:569).<br />
Rooted with<strong>in</strong> perspectives emerg<strong>in</strong>g from the disability arts movement, and aim<strong>in</strong>g to build<br />
upon „the liberatory imperative <strong>of</strong> the social model‟ (Swa<strong>in</strong> and French, 2000:569), the<br />
affirmative model is identified as a critique <strong>of</strong> the dom<strong>in</strong>ant personal tragedy model<br />
correspond<strong>in</strong>g to the social model as a critique <strong>of</strong> the medical model. In propos<strong>in</strong>g an<br />
affirmative model Swa<strong>in</strong> and French – draw<strong>in</strong>g upon the writ<strong>in</strong>gs and experiences <strong>of</strong><br />
disabled people - set out a position from which it can be asserted that, far from be<strong>in</strong>g<br />
necessarily tragic, liv<strong>in</strong>g with impairment can be experienced as valuable, excit<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
<strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g and satisfy<strong>in</strong>g. This is not to deny that there can be negative experiences result<strong>in</strong>g<br />
from impairment, but to note that this is not all that impairment is about.<br />
The explanation given by Swa<strong>in</strong> and French <strong>of</strong> the need for an affirmative model relates both<br />
to the fem<strong>in</strong>ist and social modellist perspectives described above. By disassociat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
impairment from disability, they argue, the social model leaves open the possibility:<br />
that even <strong>in</strong> an ideal world <strong>of</strong> full civil rights and participative citizenship for<br />
disabled people, an impairment could be seen to be a personal tragedy‟ (Swa<strong>in</strong> and<br />
French, 2000:571).<br />
The rejection <strong>of</strong> a tragic view and establishment <strong>of</strong> an affirmative model is not a concern <strong>of</strong><br />
the social model. The fem<strong>in</strong>ist position „<strong>of</strong> admitt<strong>in</strong>g that there may be a negative side to<br />
impairment‟ (Swa<strong>in</strong> and French, 2000:571) is also regarded as problematic. John Swa<strong>in</strong> has<br />
observed that when challenges are made to the social model on the grounds that it ignores<br />
impairment, this is always from the perspective that impairment is someth<strong>in</strong>g awful,<br />
characterised by pa<strong>in</strong> and chronic illness (Cameron, 2008:19). In argu<strong>in</strong>g for an extension <strong>of</strong><br />
the social model <strong>in</strong> order to <strong>in</strong>clude the personal, fem<strong>in</strong>ists are not mak<strong>in</strong>g a claim for the<br />
recognition <strong>of</strong> the rights <strong>of</strong> disabled people to enjoy be<strong>in</strong>g who they are.<br />
The 2000 article has been developed and elaborated upon <strong>in</strong> Swa<strong>in</strong> and French‟s 2008 book<br />
Disability on Equal Terms. Outl<strong>in</strong>ed here is a clear statement <strong>of</strong> what the affirmative model<br />
is and is not about.<br />
The affirmative model is about:<br />
be<strong>in</strong>g different and th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g differently about be<strong>in</strong>g different, both <strong>in</strong>dividually and<br />
collectively