Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
i82 DESIGN IN NATURE<br />
pierce—but we have not got rid of life." ..." Life can be produced from life only, and this law would seem to<br />
give an indication that the solution of the mystery is not to be found by considering life as merely a species of<br />
energy."<br />
Darwin, Wallace, and others have endeavoured to account for life in all its forms as the outcome of<br />
evolution, and as apart from separate creations. They assume the existence of a primordial germ, but in so doing<br />
they take for granted what requires to be proved, as the primordial germ itself has to be accounted for. " Darwin<br />
especially imagines that all the present organisms, including man, may have been derived by the process of natural<br />
selection from a single primordial germ. When, however, the backward process has reached this germ, an insuperable<br />
difficulty presents itself. How was this germ produced ? All really scientific experience tells us that Ufe can be<br />
produced from a living antecedent only ; what, then, was the antecedent of this germ ? Hypotheses have no doubt<br />
been started, but we cannot regard them in any other light than as an acknowledgment of a difficulty which cannot<br />
be overcome. .<br />
If, then, the matter of this present visible universe be not capable of itself, that is to say, in<br />
virtue of the forces and qualities with which it has been endowed, of generating life, but if we must look to the<br />
Unseen Universe for the origin of life, this would appear to show that the peculiar collocation of matter which<br />
accompanies the operations of life is not a mere grouping of particles of the visible universe, but implies likewise<br />
some peculiarity in the connection of these with the Unseen Universe. May it not denote, in fact, some peculiarity<br />
of structure extending to the Unseen ?<br />
" In fine, to go a step further, may not Ufe denote a pecuUarity of structure which is handed over not merely<br />
from one stage to another—from the Invisible to the visible—but which rises upwards from the very lowest<br />
structural depths of the material of the universe, this material being regarded as possessed of an iniinitely complex<br />
structure ? "<br />
The infinitely complex structure here referred to would, if accepted, go far to explain the extraordinary<br />
changes which occur in spores, seeds, and eggs when impregnated, whereby each produces only its own land.<br />
These changes are most numerous and most marked in the development of the higher animals, and while the<br />
microscope, chemistry, and physics are whoUy inadequate to deal with them, there is no room for doubt that living<br />
matter, as represented by the union of the male and female elements of plants and animals in reproduction and<br />
development, varies infinitely. I directed attention to this point as far back as 1873, when I attempted to refute<br />
the then prevailing idea that protoplasm and spores, seeds and eggs, were simple, homogeneous substances and<br />
fundamentally identical.^<br />
Great strides have been made in physiology and in physics since 187.3, and some have gone the length of<br />
asserting that the universe as a whole participates in every motion which occurs in even the smallest of atoms.<br />
" The law of gravitation assures us that any displacement which takes place in the very heart of the earth<br />
will be felt throughout the universe, and we may even imagine that the same thing will hold true of those molecular<br />
motions which accompany thought. For every thought we think is accompanied by a displacement and motion of<br />
the particles of the brain, and we may imagine that somehow these motions are propagated throughout the<br />
universe. . . .<br />
' Mr. Babbage has pointed out ^ that if we had power to follow and detect the minutest effects of any<br />
disturbance, each particle of existing matter must be a register of all that has happened.' .<br />
" We must resort to the Unseen not only for the origin of the molecules of the visible universe, but also for<br />
an explanation of the forces which animate these molecules, and not only so, but we are always carried back from<br />
one order of the Unseen to another. Now if this be the case—if The Universe be constructed with successive<br />
orders of this description connected with one another—it is manifest that no event whatever, whether we regard<br />
its antecedent or its consequent, can possibly be confined to one order only, but must spread throughout The<br />
Entire Universe."<br />
This intimate blending of matter and force, which includes the molecular operations of the brain and thought,<br />
implies a much more intimate union between the organic and inorganic kingdoms, and between mind and matter,<br />
than was considered possible a few years ago. The view, however extravagant it may at first sight appear, is<br />
corroborated in several particulars. The recent developments in wireless telegraphy conclusively prove that the<br />
atoms with their corpuscles or electrons play a leading role in everything that pertains to the physical universe,<br />
and that they can be made the servants of intelligent, modern man.<br />
The advances recently made in the production and employment of electricity unequivocally point to similar<br />
conclusions. While electricity has played and is destined to play a leading part in physics and physiology, its<br />
nature and properties are no more understood than are those of the atoms. It is not yet laiown whether electricity<br />
' "Oii tlii^ Relatioii uf I'laiits and Aninials to Inorganic jMatter and on the Interaction of the Vital and I'hysical Forces '<br />
^ Nintli Bridj^ewatei' Treatise.<br />
.<br />
{Lancet 15th