25.04.2013 Views

Picture - Cosmic Polymath

Picture - Cosmic Polymath

Picture - Cosmic Polymath

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DESIGN IN NATURE<br />

INORGANIC AND ORGANIC MATTER DISTRIBUTED ACCORDING TO THE SAME<br />

GENERAL LAWS: GLOBULAR, CONCENTRIC, CURVED, SPIRAL, RADIATING,<br />

BRANCHED, AND SEGMENTED ARRANGEMENTS OF MATTER. MOVE-<br />

MENTS AND RHYTHMS IN THE INORGANIC AND ORGANIC KINGDOMS<br />

—A FIRST CAUSE NECESSARY ^<br />

§ I. Atoms and Molecules under Guidance.<br />

The distribution and movements of atoms and molecules in the universe, especially that part of it forming the<br />

organic kingdom, is of the utmost importance in biology and physiology.<br />

in giving a complete explanation of them.<br />

No one, so far as I know, has succeeded<br />

Atoms and molecules, there can be little doubt, move and are moved, and arrange themselves under the<br />

operation of a First Cause, as represented by hfe and physical force— gravitation, attraction, repubion, changes<br />

of temperature, condensation, rarefaction, osmose, &c.<br />

Newton and Swedenborg held strongly to a First Cause.<br />

Newton, when speaking of the formation of the sun and fixed stars, says : " I do not think (this) expUcable<br />

by mere natural causes, but am forced to ascribe it to the counsel and contrivance of a voluntary agent."<br />

In Uke manner, Swedenborg remarks " that nothing can be truly known of the visible world without a know-<br />

ledge of the invisible, for the visible is a world only of effects, while the invisible, or spiritual, is a world of causes."<br />

Haeckel and Tyndall reject a First Cause. They attribute everything to a power inhering in matter as<br />

matter, in virtue of which it assumes shape and movement, as apart from a Creator and as apart from hfe.<br />

Kant, Herschel, Laplace and others endeavoured to explain the existence and movements of the heavenly<br />

bodies by what is known as the nebular hypothesis. Laplace was of opinion that the matter of the solar system<br />

" existed originally in the form of a vast, diffused, revolving nebula, which, gradually coohng and contracting, threw<br />

off, in obedience to mechanical and physical laws, successive rings of matter, from which subsequently, by the same<br />

laws, were produced the several planets, satellites, and other bodies of the system." ^<br />

Descartes attempted to account for the formation of the universe, and the movements of the bodies com-<br />

posing it, by a theory of vortices.<br />

It will be observed that all the philosophers referred to assume the existence of matter. It is the distribution<br />

and movements of matter, not only in the physical universe, but also in the vegetable and animal kingdoms, which<br />

is still sub judice.<br />

' What is written undei- tliis heading first appeared in an article, entitled " On the Formation of Crystals, Dendrites, Spiral, and other<br />

Structures, in Relation to Growth and Movement, esjiecially Rhythmic Movement," by the author, in the Edinhitrgh Medical Journal under dates<br />

March and April 1901. The article is now reproduced with its original illustrations, which were too numerous and costly for any journal to<br />

undertake. It has been re-cast, and short connecting pas-sages added to introduce the illustrations, but with these exceptions it is as when first<br />

the form but not the substance has been slightly altered.<br />

published :<br />

^ An alternative to Laplace's theory of the formation of planetaiy systeujs is suggested in an article by Mr. F. R. Moulton, of Chicago<br />

University, in the Astrophysieal Journal, October 10, 1905. In 1900 this writer and Prof. T. 0. Chamberlin examined the older hypothesis<br />

from the dynamical standpoint, and discovered, as they believed, cci'tain contradictions which induced them to frame a new theory.<br />

The theory now suggested supposes that the planets and their satellites have been formed around primitive nuclei of considerable dimensions<br />

existing in a spiral nebula probably similar to<br />

types.<br />

those which Prof. Kceler showed to be many times more numerous than all the nebulre of other<br />

The gi-owth of each nucleus, according to them, is caused by the gradual accretion of smaller masses, and the method of this growtii, it<br />

is suggested, accounts for all the different types of bodies now found in the solar system, and for their present motions and velocities, on dynamical<br />

principles.<br />

The original spiral nebula is supposed to have been formed by the near ap])roach of another star to the body which is now our sun. This<br />

exterior attraction, it is assumed, set up tides in the solar matter, and, lieing continued, caused immense masses to be ejected and drawn out into<br />

the spiral form. On this assumption the spiral would emerge from the central nucleus in two directions on opposite sides, and this is the form<br />

generally shown in photographs of such nebulfs, (Short notice in Kiiture of November 23, 190,5, headed "The Evolution of the Solar<br />

System.")<br />

VOL. I,<br />

I A

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!